Preview

Mock Trial

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1085 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Mock Trial
CLU3M1-01 CULMINATING ACTIVITY: MOCK TRIAL

On Behalf of the Defence:
Anver Williams v. Donovan Tisi

By: Shaneka Lewis

Opening Statement:
Greeting courtroom members, I am Shaneka Lewis apart of the Defence Attorney and I will be representing my client Donovan Tisi pleading not guilty upon the robbery and bodily harm charges. On December 5th 2013 at 5:30 PM, Anver Williams had claimed to be walking home from his basketball practice where he perhaps had been wearing his brand new basketball sneakers. As Mr. Williams was walking home he decided to take a short-cut home from a dark alley way that leads to Eglinton Ave. As Anver Williams was walking he seemed to come across a group of older men. Anver Williams explained how the young men approached him and toke away his hat and his sneakers after while being brutally attacked. My question and argument court, is to why my client Donovan is being called upon out of all of the young men who had claimed to be there during this dispute, is there enough proof or evidence to show that Donovan Tisi had been there or even took part in this crime, that Anver Williams is not sure of who had harmed or robbed him? As we are gathered here court I would like you all to investigate or try to find real evidence to prove that it had been my client Donovan that shows his participation in this act.

Cross Examination of Crown Witness #1: (Constable Rachel Di Carlo)
1.) What happened when you arrived at Donovan’s house?
2.) Did you state why you were arresting him?
3.) Was Donovan the only one home at the time of the arrest?
4.) Did you see the shoes in his house that was allegedly robbed?
5.) What size were the shoes?
6.) Did you see the hat that was allegedly robbed?
7.) What colour was it?
8.) How was Donovan’s behaviour when you came to arrest him?
9.) Was he aggressive, in state of shock, sad?
10.) Was Donovan resisting the arrest?

Cross Examination of Crown Witness #2: (Anver Williams)
1.) Can you remember what

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    The complainant pleaded guilty to possession of a pistol during the incident. A finding that the appellant and his codefendants were the aggressors is inconsistent with the fact they called the police and remained on the scene until their arrival.…

    • 522 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Delliouse Case Summary

    • 474 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Detective Mark Whatney arrested Defendant after finding cocaine in his Asheville, North Carolina home and the dead body of Donovan Delliouse in his trailer near that home. Defendant alleges that he has not been to his Asheville home in almost year, and he had a piano delivered to start taking piano lessons there. Furthermore, he claims he does not know Delliouse, he is unaware of any illegal activity at his Asheville home, and his trailer was used for storage. These events took place after Whatney received a call from Patricia, the ex-girlfriend of Defendant, on December 15, 2015 about Defendant’s drug activity. She wanted to help so she could possibly get her arson charges reduced, and she wanted justice for the Defendant’s past wrongs to her and her family. Earlier in the year, Defendant…

    • 474 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    1. Can Mr. McPhillen be held liable for assault, battery and false imprisonment when he came to the defense of someone?…

    • 847 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    This aboriginal man claimed to have been there the night of the murder and testifies that Tshuanahusset was the one that murdered William Robinson. Yet, he did not firsthand see Tshuanahusset kill William Robinson, nor did he immediately report him for the murder either. It was fifteen months before Sue Tas went to the authorities with information on the murder, and this rose no suspicion for neither the authorities nor the judicial system. The fact that Sue Tas waited this long to inform the authorities rises suspicion that perhaps he was lying because there was belief that Sue Tas was Tshuanahusset killed. Although this suspicion was out in the open, the authorities and judicial system still solely relied on Sue Tas as the only witness and did not look further into these circumstances. This could have simply been that Sue Tas saw the opportunity to pin an open case murder on Tshuanahusset which would explain why he reported him much later from when the murder actually occurred. Also, Sue Tas was threatened by his own tribe and chief after he went to the authorities and reported Tshuanahusset. This information was set aside by all authorities because they simply did not want to complicate the investigation and close it as soon as possible. This information could have meant that Sue Tas did something that was unforgivable by his tribe and this would not be revealing information, but perhaps this could be that he lied about the information to falsely convict Tshuanahusset. Furthermore, the complication of Sue Tas as the only witness should have encouraged authorities and the judicial system to look further into the murder case of William Robinson and not solely rely on one witness, yet through they perfunctory behaviour they closed the case quickly and…

    • 1492 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Lab question 3

    • 278 Words
    • 1 Page

    6. What evidence exists to cast suspicion on John Knoll? What evidence exists to suggest that he wasn't involved?…

    • 278 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Room Bullock Injustice

    • 296 Words
    • 2 Pages

    On February 22, 2016 at approximately 0026hrs Sergeant Bullock and I responded to Kennard Hall in reference to a fight that occurred in room 214. Upon arrival Officers met with Resident Director Calvin Skinner and Resident Assistant Khalil Neil and Darian Carter in the front office. Mr. Neil briefly explain what happen. Officers went to room 207 and talked with (suspect #1) Mr. Jarrett Hoffman. Mr. Hoffman informed us that he was in room 214 where the (suspect#2) Mr. Brandon Walker resides. Mr. Hoffman is a friend of the suspect # 1 roommate Mr. Andrew Jackson. Mr. Hoffman heard someone knocking on the door and opens it. Mr. Walker got mad and shoved him and asked him to leave he refused. We then talked to Mr. Walker in 214. He advised officers…

    • 296 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    landmark case

    • 643 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the year of 1991 a murder had taken place that brought upon suspicion and several conflicts amongst officials. The murder was of a man by the name of Frank Boyle and one of the suspects for the crime was Michael Feeney, the police had been informed that he was seen near the victim’s truck earlier that day. During the investigation of the murder, the police went to Feeney’s residence and waited for him to come out. When there was no answer, the police had to barge in and they searched the premises without permission. The house was an equipment trailer and the police found Feeney in his bed, they told him to get up and they saw blood stains on Feeney’s shirt. After noticing blood on his shirt the police immediately arrested him and briefly advised him of the right to a council. The accused was asked several questions and his shirt was later seized. He had been questioned for eight hours straight and he still wasn’t able to contact his lawyer, during the questioning Feeney admitted to stealing the victim’s cigarettes, beer and also some cash.…

    • 643 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Donovan Tisi

    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages

    * Dwayne is a good friend of mine. He’s about 2 years older than me.…

    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Interrogation Room shows the unethical interrogation of witnesses in a murder case at a birthday party that led to conviction of an innocent man. The murder took place in the parking area of the club in Brampton, Ontario. While Eric Morgan was celebrating his birthday party, Mike Spence was chased and shot by men in a vehicle. Three years later, six men with a gang related backgrounds were charged of the murder. But because of rumours, the birthday celebrant became the primary suspect. Witnesses were called to testify for Morgan’s innocence. During the interview, the Peel Region Police used a coercive method to the witnesses to produce a false statement against the accused. Because of the unnecessary stressful interrogation, the court has decided that their statements are inadmissible evidence for the case. Morgan remained in jail until his second trial. The primary crown witness, Morrison, started having doubts about her memory. Leaving the crown with no evidence against Morgan. The court concluded that he is not guilty. However, Eric Morgan’s life will never be the same again.…

    • 589 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Officer Smith had reasonable suspicion which is based on the totality of the circumstances as understood by those versed in the field of law enforcement; it is commonly described as something more than a hunch but less than probable cause.(quiz law) The answer is yes, Officer Smith did have reasonable suspicion to make the initial stop of the vehicle. Because the taillight appeared to be broken which is a traffic law violation. Also officer Smith remembered a vehicle that matched the general description of the car that he stopped. This car fit the description of the vehicle that was suspected in a recent roadside killing of another police officer.…

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This is a variance from the general rule that places the burden of production and persuasion on the government. For affirmative defenses, defendants bear the burden of production, that is, they must assert the defense at the time required by law. Failure to raise an affirmative defense in a timely manner acts as a waiver of the defense. States vary about the burden of persuasion placed on the defendant. Some require the defendant to prove the defense; others shift the burden to the prosecution to disprove the defense (Schmalleger, Hall, Dolatowski,…

    • 930 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Federal Rules of Evidence

    • 3961 Words
    • 16 Pages

    2. During a trial, an eyewitness was asked if they had ever been arrested. Is this a proper question? Why or why not? Cite the Federal Rule of Evidence that governs this issue.…

    • 3961 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The defendant claimed that the eye witness evidence was enough, but there is no real physical proof. No blood on the boy, no fingerprints, nothing. There is only circumstantial evidence, which even that is plausible. The boy very well could have been, and was, at the movie theater. They also claim he had a motive, but even if he did he was not the only one. The boy’s father was a rude, insensitive man. He got into bar fights often. Any number of people could have wanted to kill him. (Rose 24, 16)…

    • 693 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    * It is also possible to receive exoneration for other types of crimes, and the term may be used in other legal senses.…

    • 1020 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Imagine how hard life was for colored people back then. How one couldn’t even receive a fair trial because of someone’s color or ethnicity. How is was virtually impossible for them to receive a fair trial without people using stereotypes to structure their judgment. To Kill a Mockingbird demonstrates many conflicts, one being the beating and rape of a white woman by a black man, which back then was punishable by death. With this case, a man by the name of Atticus accepts to defend the man who is accused : Tom Robinson. Atticus has to endure what the society throws at him, along with his two children : Jem and Scout. To Kill a Mockingbird written by Harper Lee reveals, by using characters and characters’ actions and choices, it is morally correct to stand up and do the right thing. Without someone pointing out what is wrong with the society, things will never change for the better.…

    • 617 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics