Preview

Unit 3: Mcphillen V. Intoxicated Man

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
847 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Unit 3: Mcphillen V. Intoxicated Man
Unit 3: McPhillen v. Intoxicated Man
Kaplan University
PA165: Introduction to Torts
Prof: Laurence Mraz
June 26, 2012

McPhillen v. Intoxicated Man

Facts:
On the night Leroy McPhillen was a patron of The Bottom’s Up Pub, an intoxicated man began shouting obscenities at a woman seated at a table near Mr. McPhillen. As the woman ignored the man’s ranting, the man then approached the woman in a threatening manner. Before the man reached the woman, Mr. McPhillen invited the man to join him at his table. The man refused and grabbed the woman’s wrist. Mr. McPhillen then carefully twisted the man’s arm behind his back and restrained him with a neck hold. Mr. McPhillen refused the man’s request to release him, and firmly seated the man and threatened to punch him if he moved. The woman then informed Mr. McPhillen that the man was her husband.

Issues: 1. Can Mr. McPhillen be held liable for assault, battery and false imprisonment when he came to the defense of someone? 2. Can the intoxicated man be held liable for assault, battery?

Rule:
§ 1.02 Battery [7-10]
Battery occurs when the defendant’s acts intentionally cause harmful or offensive contact with the victim’s person. [See Restatement §§ 13, 16, 18.] Accidental contact, by contrast, must be analyzed under negligence or strict liability.
§ 1.03 Assault [10-15]
Assault occurs when the defendant 's acts intentionally cause the victim 's reasonable apprehension of immediate harmful or offensive contact. The Restatement, unlike many courts, deletes the requirement that apprehension be “reasonable”. [See Restatement §§ 21, 27. See also, e.g., Castro v. Loral 1199, National Health & Human Service Employees Union, 964 F. Supp. 719 (1997).]
§ 1.04 False Imprisonment [15-20]
In false imprisonment, the defendant unlawfully acts to intentionally cause confinement or restraint of the victim within a bounded area. Accidental confinement is not included and must be addressed under



References: LexisNexis, (2012). Part a. intentional torts and privileges chapter 1 intentional interferences with persons or property. Retrieved from website: http://www.lexisnexis.com/lawschool/study/outlines/html/torts/index.asp

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Mr. Craggs likewise presents that what Ms. Thompson advised police was not to redirect doubt far from herself but rather from others and that doing as such isn't an offense under segment 140. Ms. Thompson told police on January fifth there had been a little New Year's Eve party at the home she imparted to Jason MacKenzie on 3 Springhill Road in Dartmouth. Mr. MacKenzie had conveyed more than three companions to welcome in the New Year – Tyler Berry and his sweetheart, Keisha Slawter-Vassell, and Matthew Penney. Ms. Thompson told the examiners Mr. Penney left after 12 pm and she didn't know where he was going. Police agents directed a broad scan for confirmation of Mr. Penney's developments in the early morning hours of January first.…

    • 644 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The jury determined that the above facts were sufficient to find defendant guilty of the torts of false imprisonment, assault and battery. The jury grants Summary judgments for defendants Anthony Smyk and Ardmore Acres Hospital.…

    • 1197 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Substantive Facts: Respondent was arrested on the night of January 12, 1975 for the robbery of Providence cab driver John Mulvaney, which lead to his murder. Mulvaney was shot in the head with a sawed-off shotgun, however no weapon was found present on the respondent at the time of his arrest. Upon the respondents’ arrest, respondent was informed of his Miranda rights by three police officers, to which he explained he understood those rights and wanted to speak with a lawyer. Officers then placed the respondent in the rear of a squad car containing the three aforementioned officers, one of which was seated in the rear with the defendant. Once en route to the police station, the officers began…

    • 832 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Now look at Question 2 (p. 71) and pick either b, c, or d to answer. Explain your answer using legal terms and concepts from this week's readings.…

    • 954 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Assault is an intentional tort in which there is offensive physical contact or an act that…

    • 1386 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Assault is a common law offence, the actus reus of which is causing the victim to fear unlawful force. Therefore, if Moby saw the fist coming and thought he would be hit the actus reus would be satisfied for…

    • 3114 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Battery- intentional physical contact harmful or offensive to another person: the completion of an assault…

    • 1189 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Hcr Week 8 Legal Terms

    • 327 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Assault: an attempt or threat to do bodily harm to someone that is against the law like not giving a person their required medication or placing a patient in restraints without legal right to…

    • 327 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The touching element is satisfied even when there is no bodily contact between the defendant and the plaintiff. Fisher. It is enough to effectively touch by touching something that is in contact with the plaintiff. Fisher. In Fisher v. Carrousel Motor Hotel, Inc., the plaintiff’s plate was taken forcibly from his hands and the defendant yelled a racial epithet at him. The court held that this action was considered touching because the effect of touching in battery is to harm another’s personal dignity while violating the person of another. Snatching something that a person is holding and yelling offensive remarks at them violates their person and causes them personal indignity.…

    • 486 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    George Davis Case

    • 643 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Although Davis argues generally that the circuit court erroneously denied his motion to correct an illegal sentence, we discern from his brief two specific arguments as to why the circuit court should have granted his motion to correct an illegal sentence. First, Davis asserts that “Count 1-Robbery with a Dangerous and Deadly weapon, Count two First Degree Assault, [and] Count 8 Use of a Handgun in the Commission of violence” should merge. Secondly, Davis contends that he was deprived of procedural due process when his motion to correct an illegal sentence was denied without a hearing, without having given Davis the opportunity to respond to the States opposition to Davis’s motion, and without the trial judge having sufficiently articulate…

    • 643 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Unit 3 Fourth Amendment

    • 413 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution requires that no law enforcement official has the right to carry out search or seizure unless a warrant has been first issued by a judge. The exceptions are: searches with consent, frisks, plain feel/plain view, incident to arrest, automobile exceptions, exigent circumstances and open fields, abandoned property and public place exceptions (Harr, Hess, 2006, p. 219). "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized." Is what the Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution grants to every single US citizen.…

    • 413 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tort Outline

    • 9959 Words
    • 40 Pages

    1) Introduction a) Definition – A tort is a civil wrong, other than breach of contract, for which the law provides a remedy. A person who breaches a tort duty (i.e., a duty to act in a manner that will not injure another person) has committed a tort and may be liable in a lawsuit brought by a person injured because of that tort. Torts is a fault-based system. b) Purposes of tort law: (1) to provide a peaceful means for adjusting the rights of parties who might otherwise “take the law into their own hands”; (2) to deter wrongful action; (3) to encourage socially responsible behavior; and, (4) to restore injured parties to their original condition, insofar as the law can do this, by compensating them for their injury. 2) Intentional Torts a) Assault, battery, false imprisonment, trespass to chattels, and trespass to land. b) Intent i) Meaning of intent: There is no general meaning of “intent” when discussing intentional torts. For each individual tort, you have to memorize a different definition of “intent.” All that the intentional torts have in common is that D must have intended to bring about some sort of physical or mental effect upon another person. (1) No intent to harm: The intentional torts are generally not defined in such a way as to require D to have intended to harm the plaintiff. (Example: D points a water gun at P, making it seem like a robbery, when in fact it is a practical joke. If D has intended to put P in fear of imminent harmful bodily contact, the intent for assault…

    • 9959 Words
    • 40 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Simple Assault & Battery - In Florida, an assault is intentional threats, words, or actions that cause a person to fear impending violence.…

    • 982 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Assault Vs Battery

    • 789 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Firstly, one similarity of assault and battery is that they both form the mens rea. For example, both intention and recklessness form mens rea. The mens rea of assault is content when the defendant intends to cause the victim to apprehend violence or does it recklessly. This can be found in the case of R v Savage (1991), a woman threw a pint of beer over the victim’s head in a pub. The glass slipped out of her hand, smashed and cut the victims wrist. The victim was the defendant’s husband’s ex-girlfriend so there was tension between them. The defendant said it was never her intention to throw glass. The prosecution only needed to prove that the defendant wanted to soak her victim with beer and not to actually harm her beyond this. Similarly,…

    • 789 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Assault need not involve the actual physical contact with the victim. The only necessary elements for an act to qualify as an assault in tort is that there must be intent to cause fear or apprehension on the part of the tortfeasor and the act must indeed create fear or apprehension in the receiving party or victim. The intent in assault is established if a…

    • 2999 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays

Related Topics