Preview

Response To Mock's Essay (OAPA)

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
3114 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Response To Mock's Essay (OAPA)
A2 LAW – ANSWER TO ASSIGNMENT 3.12

a) Aswina threw a dish at Celia breaking one of her teeth. The most likely charge here would be assault occasioning actual bodily harm (ABH), under S47 Offences Against the Person Act 1861 (OAPA).
ABH is a triable either way offence that could be tried in either the magistrates or Crown court. It carries a maximum punishment of 5 years in prison. The actus reus is either that the defendant committed the actus reus of assault or battery and that the assault or battery caused actual bodily harm.
Assault is a common law offence, the actus reus of which is causing the victim to fear unlawful force. Therefore, if Moby saw the fist coming and thought he would be hit the actus reus would be satisfied for
…show more content…

However, she may be able to raise the defence of intoxication through alcohol. The success of such a defence however depends whether the intoxication was voluntary or involuntary. In both cases the court would firstly consider whether the intoxication took away the mens rea. In Kingston (1994) the defendant was attracted to young boys but controlled it. His friends spiked his drinks and set him up with a young boy to blackmail him. Kingston indecently assaulted the boy but at his trial stated that although he intended to do it he would not have done it had he not been drunk. The House of Lords however, upheld his conviction and refused his defence as he had intent and drunken intent was still intent and therefore he had the mens rea.
In Aswina’s case she would be claiming involuntary intoxication and therefore has the evidential burden which means she must bring in some evidence of the involuntary intoxication and its effect on her mens rea. The legal burden then passes to the prosecution to disprove her claim beyond reasonable doubt.
Involuntary intoxication, if successful, is a complete defence to all crimes and can be incurred in one of three


You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    State v Stark

    • 900 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Stark appealed sentence for judicial review of his sentence as Washington Statute proscribes under RCW 9A.36.021 Assault in the second degree is punishable with 3 12 months if that person has no prior history in which defendant can face fine of up to $20,000. Sentence under Washington Statute that exceeds 3 12 months then exceeds potential sentence.…

    • 900 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bsbwor501 Final Exam

    • 1268 Words
    • 6 Pages

    citizens are not violated. One of these aspects is known as voluntary intoxication. According to Lisa Storm in the book “Constitutional Law” intoxication is known as a mental or physical disturbance caused by alcohol or legal/illegal drugs and the Model Penal Code recognizes intoxication as a disturbance of mental or physical capabilities resulting from the introduction of substances into the body (Storm, 2014, p. 159). Additionally, there are two different elements to intoxication when it comes to defense and that lies with voluntarily and involuntary. The difference between voluntary and involuntary rests primarily on whether or not the defendant was aware they were ingesting the alcohol or drugs. Although it may seem impractical to use voluntary intoxication as a defense, it is an actual defensive strategy in the United States court system. The basis behind this defense is to show that the defendant had an inability to demonstrate criminal intent based off of their mental or physical disturbance due to their level of intoxication. Lisa Storm tells us that voluntary intoxication is frowned upon by most states as a defense but it is allowed as an element to a defensive strategy to reduce the severity of a crime as a means of demonstrating the defendants’ reduced criminal intent (Storm,…

    • 1268 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    For Lydia to be culpable for constructive manslaughter it must be proven that she “intentionally did an act” that was “criminally unlawful”, “dangerous” and the act “caused the victim’s death”. These requirements are confirmed by the HL in DPP v Newbury13. This case involved two boys who pushed a paving stone off a railway bridge as a train was approaching. The stone came through the cab and killed a guard. The HL upheld the Defendants’ convictions of manslaughter as they had the mens rea for the act which was also unlawful and dangerous. Lord Salmon stated that for a conviction of constructive manslaughter proof of mens rea was required but the Defendant only had to have the intention to “do the acts which constitute the crime”. This means the Defendant must only have the mens rea for the unlawful act to be culpable for constructive manslaughter. Lydia satisfies this requirement as she had a clear intention to throw the law reports off the balcony and unlike the use of self-defence in Scarlett14 Lydia’s actions are clearly “criminally unlawful”. Also, Lydia’s actions satisfy the test set out in Church15 which deems an act “dangerous” if all “sober and reasonable” people recognise that the act would cause the other person to be subjected to the “risk of some harm”. The decision in R v JM and SM16…

    • 1906 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Sharon should not be charged with aggravated assault and battery, but only simple assault and battery, since no deadly weapon was used.…

    • 426 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Regina Knight Case

    • 1974 Words
    • 8 Pages

    In order for a trial to be brought, the police and prosecutors might be able to prove that the elements of the particular offence are present. In this criminal case both Actus reus, Mens rea as well causation was clearly shown through the behavior of Katherine Knight.…

    • 1974 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    NFO Criticisms

    • 1342 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The majority of non-fatal offences are included in the Offences Against the Person Act 1861 (OAPA) which was described by Professor JC Smith as ‘a rag bag of offences brought together from a variety of sources’. This view is widely shared throughout the legal system, although some argue that the law works in practise and so no reform is needed. However the law does not include the common offences of Assault and Battery, providing another call for reform. The first Bill to reform this act was put forward in the 1980s, along with more drafts in 1990s, which shows the Law Commission’s dedication to modernising the Act. Despite these obvious intentions no government has passed it as of yet.…

    • 1342 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Battery- intentional physical contact harmful or offensive to another person: the completion of an assault…

    • 1189 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Hcr Week 8 Legal Terms

    • 327 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Assault: an attempt or threat to do bodily harm to someone that is against the law like not giving a person their required medication or placing a patient in restraints without legal right to…

    • 327 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    2. The McNaughten rule cannot be used to defend the actions of a person who drinks alcohol and then…

    • 525 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    a. Jessop v Johnstone (1991) Scholboy hit teacher with jotter. Teacher reacted by hitting him. However, he then hit him again. Court recosnised it was possible to instinctively react to violence and come into contact wioth another. Here. The 2nd blow was not reflexive.…

    • 991 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Section 2.03(c) does not preclude Ms. Fleshman’s claim for negligent undertaking because section 2.03(3) applies only to those responsible for providing alcohol to others. First, the Radcliffes were not providing alcohol to the party, in fact they made no affirmative action to make alcohol available, and so do not fall under the purview of the statute. Second,…

    • 1557 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Simple Assault & Battery - In Florida, an assault is intentional threats, words, or actions that cause a person to fear impending violence.…

    • 982 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Refers to hitting, slapping, scratching, pushing or rough handling of another person. It can also involve assault and battery either with the hand or another object. Restraining persons without out justifiable reason and misuse of medication are also forms of physical abuse. Inappropriate sanctions including deprivation of food, clothing, warmth and health care needs…

    • 4095 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Impaired Driving

    • 469 Words
    • 2 Pages

    If you are under the influence of drugs you can also be convicted for impaired driving. Any drug that changes…

    • 469 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    for you to give a breath sample if asked. If, for example you are convicted of…

    • 1262 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays

Related Topics