for students to learn. Also, teaching equipment can cost a lot of money that many teachers do not have. Therefore, this funding helps teachers to engage and instruct students. However, the downside to the federal involvement is the increasing number of high-stakes testing.
The tests themselves are not cause for concern. The amount of value the federal government place on the tests is the concern. The students know how pertinent the test is for their grade and this stresses students out. Stress is not beneficial to student lifelong learning. If we teach to the test, the students will likely forget the rapid mass of information pushed into them. If we make learning meaningful and align it with the standards, then the tests would not be the horrific nightmare they are for some children. Children have breakdowns about not doing well on the high-stakes tests. Students should not feel this way in school. The classroom should be a comfortable place where learning grows, not a drill practice on facts for a federal
test. In conclusion, I believe that federal involvement is a good thing overall. I believe that setting standards on education allows structure to come into the classroom. Children need structure. I also believe they need meaningful learning experiences. Therefore, the standards allow us to make learning meaningful and teach concepts important to their individual developmental stage. The only downside is how high-stakes testing is the string that comes attached to the standards of teaching. High-stakes testing should be presented or performed in a different way so students do not feel the suffocating stress that it brings.