Preview

Federalist Vs D/R

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
612 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Federalist Vs D/R
Our founding fathers didn’t want political parties, and they tried to prevent them but then in 1796 the Federalist and Democratic/ Republican parties were formed.(D/R) Three issues the federalist and the D/R disagreed on were foreign policy, the powers of the National government vs the state government and tariffs. First issue the Federalist and D/R parties differed on was foreign policy. Foreign policy was interacting with other countries especially Europe. The Federalist wanted the U.S to be active and they wanted to be an ally with Britain because Britain was our biggest trading partner and they had a navy that were protecting our ships and coastline. However the D/R wanted an isolationist foreign policy because they wanted to stay away from having relations with other countries because they thought if they leaved other countries alone they would leave us alone. The D/R also didn’t want to get pulled into the upcoming war in Europe. The second issue the Federalist and the D/R disagreed on was the powers of the National government vs the state government. This was listed under article 1 in the constitution. The Federalist believed in using a loose interpretation which was the elastic clause to build a strong government but on the other hand the D/R did not …show more content…

Tariffs is a tax on imports. Federalist favored raise money for the government and make your countires products more competitive.( protect american business ) The Federalist were in favor because they wanted to help Northern business. The Feds also liked this because it was an indirect tax that raised money and people didn’t know they were paying it because it was built into the products price. However the D/R didn’t like this idea because they thought that the British would retaliate and put taxes on are goods and that would hurt consumers pay higher prices in america. and we would have to pay more and the good would go up in

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    During the presidencies of Thomas Jefferson and James Madison, the two political parties were still somewhat true to their founding ideas, but not completely. The different parties had started to let go of their strong stances and instead begin to take a more, middle of the road viewpoint. The Jeffersonians began to sway from their strict constructionism partly, as they passed things like the 1st Bank of the United States, which went against almost everything the Jeffersonians were for and allowed the government to read-into the constitution. As the Jeffersonians started letting go of their ideals, so did the Federalists.…

    • 513 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout the beginning of the country's political growth, the United States was divided into two basic political parties known as the Federalists and the Jeffersonian Republicans. While Jefferson and Madison's presidencies were opposed by the Federalists, some of their contributions supported the Federalist Party's beliefs.. While Jefferson and Madison's decisions in office were mainly based of off a strict construction of the constitution, some decisions came from a loose construction. These loose construction decisions can be seen in the Louisiana Purchase and Jefferson and Madison's support of the national bank.…

    • 439 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Starting in the years 1801-1817 there was a separation in the United States. The Federalists and Dem-Rep parties were basically opposites of each other. The Republicans were usually seen as strict constructionists, who opposed the broad constructionism of both Jefferson and Madison who were Federalists. In both, Jefferson’s and Madison’s presidencies they highlighted Federalists ideals in their decisions, including Jefferson’s purchase of the Louisiana territory.…

    • 463 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Conflict over foreign and domestic policies between Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson led to the development of two political parties. Although the Jeffersonian-Democratic were strict constructionist and the Federalists were loose constructionists, both failed to be consistent and chose whichever interpretation that better served their interests at the time.…

    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The two main political parties in early America, the Federalists and the Democratic-Republicans, fought many ideological and political battles from 1790 to 1810. Conflicts between these two parties grew out of their opposing ideologies the Democratic-Republicans supported states rights and a strict interpretation of the U.S. Constitution, whereas the Federalists favored a strong central government and a broader interpretation of the Constitution. However there are more than 3 major topics that I could talk about involving the Federalist and Democratic-Republicans between the years 1789 and 1812. Some of the topics are boring and some of the topics are pretty interesting.…

    • 383 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the early stages of the United States, two political parties emerged disagreeing with each other of who should have the power and what kind of government the nation should be composed of. The Federalist party wanted a strong national government and was thought to have a loose interpretation of the Constitution through the Elastic Clause. Onthe other hand, the Jeffersonian Republican party maintained that the states should retain the power and thought that the Elastic clause allowed the national govt too much power. They were know as the strict constructionists. Although the Republicans maintained this characterization at the beginning, the two parties exchanged their roles with each other during the presidencies of Jefferson and Madison, either because of certain political and foreign circumstances or ironically to make sure that the other party loses its power.…

    • 572 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    With many different views on how to run the government, it was hard to depict which parties’ group would be the strongest and the best fit to control the country: the Federalists’ or the Democratic-Republicans. The Federalists’ wanted a very strong government to bring together the bickering states. On the other hand, the Democratic-Republicans pictured more independent state governments to rule the people. Although they didn’t agree on many things they did have one idea in common, such as, both parties wanted to follow the Constitution, but in different ways.…

    • 499 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The debates over ratification of the Constitution represent the most important and intellectually sophisticated public debates in American history. On the one side, the supporters of the Constitution, or "Federalists," argued that the nation desperately needed a stronger national government to bring order, stability and unity to its efforts to find its way in an increasingly complicated world. Opponents of the Constitution, or "Antifederalists," countered that the the governments of the states were strong enough to realize the objectives of each state. Any government that diminished the power of the states, as the new Constitution surely promised to do, would also diminish the ability of each state to meet the needs of its citizens. More dramatically, the Antifederalists argued that the new national government, far removed from the people, would be all to quick to compromise their rights and liberties in the name of establishing order and unity.…

    • 1180 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    During the 1700’s, the first political parties formed over disagreements in the government. The two parties were the federalists and Antifederalists. Federalists made up the people who felt that the stronger government was better for the country and supported the Constitution. The federalists had felt as if different “fiscal and monetary policies” were a weakness for the national economy. Also, the federalists supported banking("Anti-Federalist vs Federalist"). Federalists wanted to fight for stronger governments, managing the country’s debt and ratification. Antifederalists were people who opposed the Constitution of 1788 and disagreed with a stronger federal government. The Antifederalists wanted to keep the power to be for states and local…

    • 183 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    apush

    • 1636 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Federalist states were the Northern states who were merchants and sailors that liked Hamilton’s ideas to gain economic and self-interest.…

    • 1636 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    dbq essay

    • 438 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Federalists and the Democratic-Republicans also had different views about how to interpret the Constitution. The Federalists had a loose interpretation of the Constitution and thought it was flexible.…

    • 438 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Hamilton and Jefferson represented different interests that would come to define the priorities of the nation's 1st political parties (Thomas 10). These two-party political systems were impacted by domestic and foreign affairs. Hamilton and Jefferson had different interests that would define the priorities of the nation's first political parties. The Federalists and Antifederalists division took place during the debates over ratification of the constitution (Sisung 2). The Federalists were more centralized, and they could keep their name as the Federalists because they were much more modest. They were known as those who only looked up to the government and followed all their rules. The Anti-Federalists were decentralized and had a variety of names, Democratic Republicans, Republican, but were mostly called Jeffersonian Republicans. They believed in freedom and opposed the Constitution and federal government which was the total opposite of what the Federalists believe in.…

    • 1242 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    What's the difference between a Federalist and an Anti-federalist? Why did they have different perspectives on the ratification of the Constitution? Republicans and Democrats are not the original political parties. As i'm getting older i will be eligible to vote at the age 18, I will know the difference between the two. The Political parties had changed over the year where now the rules are way different back then.…

    • 69 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    During the Constitutional Debate era in American history, the tension between two political parties, the Federalists, led by Secretary of Treasury Alexander Hamilton, and the Anti-Federalists, also known as Democratic-Republicans grew due to opposing opinions on central government, the U.S. economy, and the French Revolution.…

    • 175 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jefferson and Madison

    • 456 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In the Nineteenth Century, the Federalist and Democratic – Republican parties were greatly opposed to one another. Democratic Republicans were strict constructionists and Federalists were loose constructionists. Although these two parties’ policies were extremely different, both Thomas Jefferson and James Madison presidencies would be defined by Federalist policies, even though they both were Democratic – Republicans.…

    • 456 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays