other rights within the society. To disenfranchise an entire group of citizens in a democratic
society is to violate the very principles of democracy. Because the right to vote is so essential to
the preservation of a democratic society, felons ought to retain the right to vote.
Felons are denied their right to just representation when they are disenfranchised. The
right to vote is a natural right for all naturalized citizens in a democratic society. Felons are no
exception. Although felons have broken the rule with society, they are given their due by the
removal of their rights while in prison. The completion of a felon serving out their sentence in
prison is a just punishment, however taking away their right to vote is an act that strips felons
their right to be represented in government. When a democratic society does not allow a certain
group of people to participate in government, they are essentially ignoring that population
and denying them representation. When looking at felons, disfranchisement especially skews
representation because it puts minorities and the underprivileged at an extreme disadvantage.
Also, just representation is paramount for the preservation of a democratic society. Since
its birth in ancient Europe, many derivatives of a democratic society have been formed. From
a direct democracy to a constitutional democracy to a republic, the most key component to a
democratic society is the right for all citizens to have a say in political, economic, and social
decisions made by the government. Just representation is not the only aspect of a government
that makes it democratic but it is the most necessary to the preservation of a democratic society
because it is the basis for the founding of the very system. The votes of all people ought to be
weighed equally in order to prevent democracy from becoming a tyranny of a certain group.
Without just representation for minorities, such as felons, a democratic society becomes
democratic only in name.
In order to preserve a democratic society, felons must be given just representation. Democracy
was founded on the premise that all citizens ought to have their voices heard. The haves, the
have-nots, and everyone in between deserve a say in how they are governed and how social,
economic, and political choices are made in the society because every person feels in impact
of these decisions. For these reasons felons ought to be given the right to vote. If they, too, are
citizens of a democratic society then they are entitled to just representation. The wrongs that they
have committed against society are taken into account when they serve their sentence so there
is no reason to deny them participation in government. One of the most important democratic
ideals is the idea that citizens of a society should not be silenced because of the decisions they
make or the beliefs that they hold, instead they are entitled to a voice in government simply
because they are the governed. Not only must felons be given the right to vote to promote
democracy by also to better society. In order to preserve the very ideals of a democratic society,
felons must be given just representation in politics through the right to vote.
However, even non-felons are capable of bad judgment. If we are disenfranchising felons
because of a bad decision and/or bad decision-making, there are plenty of other people who
shouldn't be allowed to vote. The society cannot set that standard of good decision versus bad
decision in any absolute form regarding elections.
Overall, Felon should have right to vote felons should have minimal rights and law
protections for themselves, and voting is a fundamental for democratic country. Also, since we
can’t discriminate people with decision making, felons should have right to vote.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
Revoking convicted felon’s rights to vote has been an issue at hand in politics since the beginning of our nation. Edward Fesser published an article in the magazine titled City Journal called “Should Felons Vote?” In the article he is arguing against the views of Democrats and their motives for restoring convicted felons voting rights. He says their motives are to expand their chances in winning an election. Edward Fesser’s argument is weak because he fails to provide substantial evidence supporting his arguments on the disenfranchisement of felons.…
- 783 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
According to the law, everyone is entitled to vote, to be specific, the age of 18 and above. I believe felons should be allowed to vote because people make mistakes. There are many people who want to live right, they can’t because they are being kept down, the situation they’re in leads them to be in a bad place. For example, if a person commits theft, it’s most likely they’re poor. He/she steals because they are desperate for what they don’t have; basic needs or necessities of life. I believe felons should be allowed to vote, even if they are criminals, they deserve a second chance, it is not fair to take away their right to vote. This is as if like taking away their freedom of speech. Everyone has a voice and it should stand out, even if…
- 211 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
The number of Americans who cannot vote because they have been convicted of a felon continues to rise. According to the National institute of justice about a quarter of felons are in prison, but the rest have completed their sentences and are on probation or parole. The only reason not to let them vote is to stigmatize them or to continue punishing them. Voting would help ex felons re-engage with society by showing them that they have equal importance in the society, for example ,it shows that their opinion is just as important as anyone else's. Also, this may not always be a good thing. Not all ex felons can be trusted and not all ex felons judgment and credibility can be trusted.…
- 442 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
This essay discusses my reflection on whether or not felons should have the right to vote. A felon is defined as a person who has been convicted of a felony, which is a crime punishable by death or a term in state or federal prison. A felony is a serious crime usually punishable by imprisonment or death. Convicted felons should not be allowed to vote. Many Americans were not allowed to vote these past elections. It wasn’t because they didn’t pay taxes or were mentally incompetent or underage. The reason why they can’t vote is because they are convicted felons. Once someone has committed a serious crime or felony, they have shown that they are not trustworthy enough to vote. Because they disobeyed the law, they should not have the obligation to vote. If one is sent to prison, they have agreed that most of their rights have been taken. Prison is meant to be a punishment and one of their punishments is their loss of freedom and democratic rights for their time of their sentence. Convicted felons have also demonstrated poor judgment and should not be trusted with a vote. The main point of a prison sentence to show the offender and society that criminal behavior results in loss of freedom and most of the rights that freedom has to offer. Therefore felons should not be allowed to vote. Although some people believe that felons should be allowed to vote at any circumstance but I believe that if they are felons they have already lost that opportunity because they have decided to make the choice to participate in criminal activities. If the felon is not willing to follow the law himself, then they should not demand the right to vote. In California, felons serving time in prison or county jail are denied their right to vote. According to The Sentencing Project, 5.3 million Americans were unable to vote in 2008 due to a felony conviction. Unfortunately, statistics show that this number is expected to rise to 6 million.…
- 574 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Direct democracy: A form of government in which all laws are created by a general vote of society.…
- 3244 Words
- 11 Pages
Good Essays -
People who run the United States including President Donald J. Trump do not believe that ex-felons should have the right to vote. In President Trump’s own words, “They’re giving 200,000 people that have been convicted of heinous crimes, horrible crimes, the worst crimes, the right to vote.…
- 1520 Words
- 7 Pages
Good Essays -
the main governing body, in the UK’s case its Westminster. The UK is also democratic…
- 759 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
According to the Constitutional Law, at the age of eighteen you are legally given a right to voice your opinion in voting. What happens when the law is broken for something you have done illegally, should your rights be taken away? How can a crime be so bad to where rights are taken? I believe all rights should be restored once the person whom committed the crime have paid their debt to society by doing the time because No Crime should take away their right to voice opinions, they have paid their debt by doing the consequence of the crime, and all should be given a second chance.…
- 680 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Imagine you were planning for a trip to Southeast Asian countries. You wanted a white…
- 1702 Words
- 7 Pages
Good Essays -
Democracy means “rule by the people” and originated in Athens, Greece. In this political system, citizens directly influence the government's decisions or elect leaders through free and fair elections. Regardless, laws are created to protect natural rights that are applicable to all people, who in turn are expected to actively participate in civic life. The will of the majority holds sway in a democracy, but the rights of the minority are not…
- 908 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Franklin Roosevelt once said, “Nobody will ever deprive the American people of the right to vote except the American people themselves and the only way they could do this is by not voting.” Voting is particularly important to the American citizen, it’s a chance to have your voice heard. According to the why on average do only sixty percent of eligible voters turnout to elections? As the lower class grows voting turnouts decrease because the more money you have the more likely you are to vote and vise versa.…
- 709 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Scott, T. C., 2011. Should prisoners have the right to vote? Available at: <http://www.in-debate.com/2011/10/prisoners-vote/> [Accessed on 01 February 2014].…
- 1580 Words
- 5 Pages
Better Essays -
When someone commits a crime, this person is put behind bars. The reason for that is because this person did something illegal, meaning breaking the law and is now considered a threat to society. So being taken to jail is their punishment for the crime committed. And the thing is that lots of things get taken away from them including their basic choices of what to wear or eat, their rights to see their relatives and friends whenever they please and most importantly their liberty. Although there is a debate going on, on whether prisoners should be treated in that way, then why shouldn’t they at least be given the right to vote?…
- 113 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
In today’s society, we need to voice our opinions. There are many ways to get our opinions out. We could write letters visit our fellow politicians, and call their offices. But the most effective way to get your opinions out there is to vote. Voting is what our country builds off of. We as American citizens had the constitutional right to vote for the President of the United States, Governor, Mayor, etc. But for some reason, some individuals feel that they don’t need to vote. They could not be any more wrong. Voting is important because it shows that we pay attention to politics, the issues of the day, and to get your voice heard.…
- 613 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
But that doesn’t mean the convicted prisoner loses all his rights as soon as he becomes a detainee upon conviction. The court also held that section 3 of the representation of the people act, 1983 stripped the right to vote for a significant number of people and therefore irrespective of how long their imprisonment time is or how serious the crime, it applies to all convicted prisoners. This, according to any reasonable person cannot be said as acceptable or reasonable.…
- 1622 Words
- 7 Pages
Good Essays