Preview

Feminism During The Late 19th And Early Twentieth Century

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1177 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Feminism During The Late 19th And Early Twentieth Century
Governments should reflect the will of their people. They, the government, are accountable for their people, and vise versa. Society should be structured how the people who live in those said societies wish to live in them. For example, we can see this being true all over the world with the feminist movement. Throughout history, we can see evidence of people demanding women's rights and equality, but the major turning point of course, is when western governments acknowledged the want the people, giving women the right to vote during the late nineteenth and early twentieth century. Since then, Feminism has turned into a mass movement, through the refusal of being silent in exploring the social constructs of gender, and gender roles. This was …show more content…
In a modern liberal society we consider this a fault in present day liberalism. Collectively, we have yet to find a solution where capitalism can be encouraged, and economic equality exists between the people. In more left-wing governments, there is some interference from the government encouraging economic equality. The higher taxation of the rich is an example, as it forces wealthy people to help support their government and the rest of their country by paying for the ongoings of the government(more importantly social programs which help less fortunate people). There is things like also minimum wage and social benefits which creates a standard which people must be paid so they have. Both exist to make sure poorer people have a higher income and can stay on their feet. Socialist countries who focus more on economic equality have citizens who are generally happier. A government should focus on the happiness of their people, ultimately, that means helping and promoting some type of economic equality. As a government, it is hard to promote greater or true economic equality because generally, we like capitalism. Economic freedom and the idea of ownership is important to our society. These capitalistic ideals helps individuals understand and put physical evidence to show who they are. …show more content…
We can see examples of these in the people who run our government. They are all of different ages, genders, and ethnicities, allowing all people of Canada (minorities or marginalized groups) to be represented in government. In our Charter of Rights and Freedoms, every aspect of liberalism is protected, including every citizen the right to these freedoms. As Canadians, currently, we are one of the few countries in the world that are not shying away from globalization. As a multicultural country, we support countries all over the world, an example of this is in Trudeau's controversial decision to send three billion overseas in his first month in office, or Canada and the EU’s CEPTA trade agreement. These actions are important since they establish relationships all over the world, benefiting Canadian’s rights not only in their own country, but all over the world. For example, we have kept in good terms with Cuba since they became a Communist country. A very liberal decision, showing we understand and are not threatened by their abandonment of democracy. Moreover, this says we comprehend there are different ways societies wish to live then our own. The simple act of Canada being a democracy is itself an example of liberalism. This allows the thoughts and wants of the people to be reflected in actions in government. During the last Canadian Federal election, we could see this to be true, when

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    The 1920s was a quite controversial decade concerning women’s position. People, trying to forget about the shock of the Great War, buried themselves in an unabashed materialism and hedonism. It was a decade when all old norms were extinguished not only for women but for the whole society. It was the time of one of the greatest changes American society ever experienced.…

    • 1390 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Femenism In The 1800's

    • 461 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Prior to the 1800's the Jews were persecuted for their religious beliefs. After the 1800's they were looked upon as the killer of Jesus, and was subjected to punishment by local governments, religious leaders, and dictators.…

    • 461 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The success of the women’s rights movement in the mid-1800s was mostly from the women’s of the 1800s to get equal rights, better education, the right to vote, and so much more. Reformers such as Lucretia Mott and Elizabeth Cady Stanton became powerful speakers for women’s rights movement. They held Anti-Slavery Conventions in London and were not able to participate in the proceedings. And took act that women should get more rights. Mott and Stanton begun thinking of holding a conventions. And after long years women got better education, new careers, and the right to vote.…

    • 96 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The purpose of this research bibliography was to present the most important theories about feminism in the 18th and 19th century. One of them was Liberal Feminism which was discussed in the book Feminist thought. For all the ways liberal feminism may have gone wrong for women, it did some things very right for women along the way. Women owe to liberal feminists many of the civil, educational, occupational, and reproductive rights they currently enjoy. They also owe to them the ability to walk increasingly at ease in the public domain, claiming it as no less their territory than men’s. Perhaps enough time has passed for feminists critical of liberal feminism to reconsider their dismissal of it.…

    • 400 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Are the Rich Necessary

    • 2480 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Some people referred to as egalitarians or equalitarian wishes to get rid of the rich or at least reduce the extremes of wealth and poverty. They views rich as parasites because they reap the benefits in luxury while the poor work hard at minimum wage to earn their money. They argue that wealth causes poverty, the rational without the rich there would be no poor. When calculated, if the top one percent of rich in America gave half of their net income to the poor, poverty defined by the government would be eliminated in the US. This may be true for America but the affect on the global poor would be minimal because the needs of the poor globally are greater than American poor. The problem is not that the rich does not adequately share with the poor, instead they grind people to the ground, exploit them, steal from them, and deny them with decent living standards or health care.…

    • 2480 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The American movement for women’s liberation and rights was undoubtedly the most progressive in the decades that followed the Second World War. The second wave of feminism that ensued in the 1960s and 70s redirected the goals and ambitions in the fight for gender equality in many aspects. This new wave of liberal reform allowed women to break free from the domestic sphere from the conservative restraints of the 1950s, which have traditionally limited a women’s access to the same political, economic, and educational rights as men. While the fight for women’s equality started to make real headway post World War II, the fight for women’s rights has existed long before then. This can be seen in the Antebellum reforms or the first wave of feminism from the early 19th century to the early 20th century.…

    • 839 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Socialism -vs- Capitalism

    • 366 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Socialism vs. Capitalism Samantha Conti University of Phoenix Comm. /105 –January 12, 2008 The disadvantages of Communism are that people have to be willing to work for the greater good of society, not just themselves. They will not receive all the fruits of their labor, no matter hoe much you work you will always get the same salary. Why would you want to work so hard if you were going to make the same amount of money? Human rights abuses, lack of incentives for progress for individuals which results in a slow progressing society as a whole. Under Socialist theory the individual’s needs are determined and satisfied collectively. Dissent and venturing out on one’s own are not option. Everyone is an employee and tenant of the state. In Communism people have little rights, everything is run by the government resulting in enormous economic failures, including famine, militarism and propaganda to cover-up the systematic failures of the government. Capitalism was developed in Europe in the 19th and early 20th century. Capitalism is an economic arrangement in which people have the individual liberty and the right to own property and to do what they wish with their property as long as it does not harm anyone else. These freedoms set Capitalism apart from all other kinds of economic arrangements. The Capitalist system is based in giving each individual the freedom to better (or worse him or herself). Capitalism signifies means of production. The heart of Capitalism is the producer’s right to make what he wants and the consumer’s right to choose what to buy. A free market economy and free enterprise. The major benefit of Capitalism is private property, the concept that people have the right and privilege to control their possessions as they wish. In a Capitalism economy the role of the government reflect the desire and goals of its citizens. Capitalism societies suffer from poverty too, but in a different way as there is a vastly unequal distribution of wealth (a few…

    • 366 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Feminism: a topic of discussion in many homes and classrooms, which asserts the utmost attention amongst its listeners. A crazy ideal that believes women hold fundamental rights among men, and deserve the same treatment, the same opportunities. Feminism has grown since its conception in the early 20th century, and has catapulted upward in a grand and illustrious fashion, clinging to the souls of women who will no longer be oppressed by an abusive patriarchy. However, in this decade, feminism has become the topic of crude humor, has been made the punchline of jokes directed toward women. Feminism has become merely a way to generalize women as “crazy, hormonal monsters” who should never have a say in democracy because their “time of…

    • 562 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Feminism in 1920s

    • 597 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The 1920s was a very important decade to women’s history. The 19th amendment, stating the right to vote can’t be denied on basis of sex, was passed in congress in 1920 and with female working population was only increasing yearly. Women may not be able to have equal opportunities as men in education and the labor force but society was affected with women becoming increasingly independent and initiative in the work force. Traditionally families changed and frowned upon practices become tolerated as well as specific work fields being introduced to women were what changed in society from women who became less reliant on men.…

    • 597 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Does Inequality Matter

    • 381 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Let 's look at economic policies of rich democracies that do not have such a huge economic gap. One can usually find centralized wage bargaining. This always compresses each end of the earning spectrum. The U.S. has no such policy. It is easier in other nation 's to develop unions as compared to the United States. The United States does little to limit wage inequality. The minimum wage in the U.S. is low, unionization is difficult, and the U.S. doesn 't transfer as much money to those who are not working than most other rich democracies (Jencks, 2002). It seems ironic that a country where so much emphasis is placed on social equality places so little effort to reduce economic inequality.…

    • 381 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    The democratic ideal that “All men are created equal" is the basis of The Declaration of Independence and is deeply rooted in American history. However, this ideal is not as realistic when looking closer into American society. For instance, the idea of equality is never actually mentioned in The Constitution. The United States is known for being built on freedom and foreigners look to it as the possibility for the American dream, but there have been many key events in history that show the fragility of civil rights and the reality of inequality in the United States. Democracy is defined as a government created by the people and for the people. Human rights are necessary for a democratic system.…

    • 2234 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    There is also a negative element in regard to Social justice and capitalism that should be discussed. Capitalism without a doubt, often encourages exploitative practices at the cost of widening the inequality between social classes. Karl Marx had written extensively regarding the inequality between the social classes. Marx witnessed the rich get richer while the working class poor labored in terrible working conditions. Unfortunately the elite rich have abused a lot of the tenants of capitalism. That being said, when we look over the history of capitalism we do see that generally speaking, people enjoy a higher standard of living, and most certainly enjoy a higher standard of personal freedom which, in my opinion favors social…

    • 1565 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The major causes of income inequality are incentives and efficiency. Income inequality largely rewards to individuals for supplying their talents and resources to the economy. Proponents of income equality falsely assume that there is some fixed amount of output produced and therefore income to be distributed. In reality, the government takes tax and transfer process of high-income individuals and rewards it to low-income individuals. In short terms, taxes are a reduction in the rewards from increased productive effort; redistribution through tax transfers is a reward for diminished effort. The basic argument for income inequality is income inequality is justified because it results from differences in the quantity and quality…

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    It is argued that inequality is a natural consequence of the free market economy in which the individual income and wealth are decided according to their marginal productivity. As people know that they can make more money than other people does if they work harder in the free market economy, the inequality encourages them to work harder to change their position in the distribution of income.…

    • 1570 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Under pure socialism, classes become indistinguishable—if not nonexistent—due to its focus on equality. Although this may be preferable to the lives of the Industrial Revolution-era lower class, it ignores the human race’s competitive nature, taking key motivations away from the people needed to spur their society’s economy. Pure capitalism, on the other hand, recognizes this need for motivation, stating that when people are given economic freedom, “the obvious and simple system of natural liberty establishes itself of its own accord” (Smith). Despite the motivation that this system provides, it only serves to worsen the class inequality still present to this day. Because capitalist societies are barely under any government economic control, the most successful people continue to be just as successful, leaving the poorest with little to no chance of class mobility. Communism, like capitalism, attempts to provide motivation for its citizens. However, since communism is based mostly upon people being “instruments of labour” working for their societies (Marx and Engels), motivation for the sake of the individual becomes almost impossible. In place of this, communism attempts to provide a more community-focused motivation, but without monetary reward, the work can begin to seem…

    • 793 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays