Preview

Ferdinand de Saussure's Structuralism

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
899 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Ferdinand de Saussure's Structuralism
STRUCTURALISM

- A theoretical method which is analytical not evaluative. - A way of approaching texts and practices derived from Ferdinand de Saussure.

Exponents of Structuralism include:

|Name |Field |
|Claude Lévi Strauss |Anthropology |
|Roland Barthes |Literary and Cultural Studies |
|Michel Foucault |Philosophy and History |
|Jacques Lacan |Psychoanalysis |
|Louis Althusser |Marxist Theory |

Introduction: Structuralist criticism designates the practice of critics who analyse literature on the explicit model of modern linguistic theory. It includes Russian Formalists (Roman Jakobson) and Paris-based writers who apply to literature the concept of the French linguist Ferdinand de Saussure (1915). This is part of a larger movement called French Structuralism (1950s) inaugurated by Claude Lévi Strauss. Saussure was profoundly uncomfortable with traditional linguistics.

Structuralism was a departure from humanistic criticism. 1) Literary ‘work’ becomes a ‘text’ (constituted by a play of component elements according to specifically literary contents and codes) which has no truth value: a) Language does not mirror reality. b) Language is not unchanging. c) Written language is not superior to oral language. 2) The author is regarded as a construct – allowed no initiative or

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    If the reader is given full authority on the meaning of a work, then their interpretation of the work will take precedent over the facts and contexts that surround the work. In addition, when meaning is completely shifted to the reader, then the meaning of a work becomes too fluid. The meaning of the work changes from reader to reader. As a result, there is no longer an avenue for the meaning of the work to be questioned or examined. These examples show the implications of exclusively committing to either authorial intent or reader-response.…

    • 1067 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Textual form has the ability to differentiate whether or not a text accomplishes an idea the composer is attempting to create. The way in which a composer represents different perspectives throughout texts can have the power to influence and induce their audience to analyse and understand their purpose in a subjective way. Ted Hughe’s famous poems within his anthology ‘Birthday Letters’, Sylvia Plath’s moving poetry relating to Hugh’s, and the contradictory film by Stephen King, ‘The Shawshank Redemption’ are three examples of texts that have conflicting textual form.…

    • 682 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This chapter describes literature. The works of literature, and how it evolves from everything that revolves around us. Literature is very diverse because it comes from many different aspects. It can be derived from anything and therefore can have very different or very similar meanings.…

    • 423 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    the author’s use of literary devices to contribute to the richness of textual meaning; and to control the…

    • 1184 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The world of literature exists because of the literary works that have been uniquely crafted throughout time; in fact, such works of literature exist thanks to the great masterminds of literary authors—both dead and alive. When one thinks of the literary world, he or she should think about its sub work—the world of literary interpretations. Why? Think about it: The world consists of diverse readers, and for that reason, one is exposed to a wide range of literary interpretations; thus, enabling he or she to formulate his or her unique literary analysis. When it comes to interpreting a literary text, it is pivotal for one to realize that his or her job is to develop an understanding of the text’s meaning—develop his or her own philosophy of the text. In addition, at times, one will encounter individuals that make such a beautiful impact in his or her life, to a point where he or she cannot imagine what life would look like without him or her.…

    • 194 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Eng 125

    • 2812 Words
    • 12 Pages

    Many have tried to define what "literature" is or what makes something "literary;" no one has successfully defined literature in such a way that it accounts for the complexities of language and the wide variety of written texts. Some define literature as writing which is "imaginative" or fictive, as opposed to factual, true, or historical. As some argue, literature transforms…

    • 2812 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Henderson, G. and Brown, C. 1997. Glossary of Literary Theory. [online] Available at: http://www.library.utoronto.ca/utel/glossary/Old_criticism.html [Accessed: 8 Mar 2014].…

    • 2110 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Literary Perspectives

    • 1379 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Formalist critics are primarily concerned with the language, structure, and tone of a work, otherwise known, as it’s “formal elements”. Formalists gravitate towards “intrinsic” matters in a piece of literature, in simpler terms, diction, irony, paradox, metaphor, and symbol. In a similar fashion, they emphasize larger elements, for instance, plot, characterization, and narrative technique, in order to derive meaning from a literary work. The work must stand by itself, and any information that goes beyond the text, for example, biography, history, politics, and economics is considered “extrinsic” by formalists, and therefore far less important than what happens within the confines of the text itself. Poetry, in particular, as well as drama and fiction lend themselves well as genres to the “close reading” involved in the formalist technique. Formalists might approach Kate Chopin’s “ The Story of an Hour”(15) by analyzing the ironic ending of the story. Mrs. Mallard suddenly dies of a heart attack, not because her husband has died in a horrific train crash but because she has learned that he is very much alive. The disparate nature between what is expected to transpire and what actually happens creates a complex irony which formalists value immensely over simple surprise tactics.…

    • 1379 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stanley Fish Argument

    • 1783 Words
    • 8 Pages

    This means that Brooks is concerned is concerned with formalism. Critics such as Brooks are only concerned with the text itself; they take the content of the text and think of it as form. Indeed, Brooks’ aforementioned article is titled “The Formalist Critics”. In this article, he discusses the importance of removing the author from the text, so that the text can be the primary focus of the criticism. Already, Brooks is paving the way for the importance of the individual reader to be recognized.…

    • 1783 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stuff

    • 531 Words
    • 3 Pages

    This approach is most widely used in literary criticism; it focuses on the form and development of the literary work itself. Every writer chooses particular literary tools to create a representation of something that exists in his or her imagination. As illustrated in the analysis of Wordsworth’s poem above, the formalist critic identifies the literary tools and techniques that the writer chooses and shows how they are used to make the intent of the writer and the significance…

    • 531 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    His father fought with the Confederate Army, returned to England, married, and died while in his 30s.…

    • 1188 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nietzsche and Saussure show in their articles that the speaker or viewpoint is what leads to the illusions of rhetoric causing misunderstanding to persuade society. Society today lives off these illusions of rhetoric Nietzsche states that “The art of dissimulation reaches its peak in humankind, where deception, flattery, lying and cheating, speaking behind the backs of others, keeping up appearances, living in borrowed finery, wearing masks, the drapery of convention, play-acting for the benefit of others and oneself.” (Nietzsche 142) This shows that society today lives off deceit and have become accustomed to spitting out false news than telling the truth. These lies are what leads to the illusions or misunderstandings in society. The interesting…

    • 279 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Formalist Criticism: it emphasizes the text. detemines the style, structure, tone and imigary of the text, and how all these elements are working together in the story and what effect is it having on the readers. this only examines the text itself, it doesnt matter what is the settig, history or caracters.…

    • 168 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Saussure was a Swiss linguist who focused specifically on languages in history rather than general linguistics. (Chandler, 2013) His studies in semiotics began in the early 1900’s where he focused on the nature of the signs as a part of behaviour (Leeds-Hurwitz, 2012, p. 6) and believed that “language is a system of signs that expresses ideas, and is therefore comparable to a system of writing.” (Innis, 1986 p. 231) Saussure’s studies in semiotics lead him to the belief that speech is only possible because it is based on the system of language. (Barthes, 1968) From this he proposed a system of Langue (language) and Parole (speech) identifying the “relationship between “language” and “speech” is similar to that between “code” and “message.”” (Huhtamo, 2003)…

    • 1268 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    ‘From work to text’ by Rolland Barthes gives an initiative to look at a piece of writing, photograph, literature piece, painting, sculpture et cetera from a different way, in which the piece is analyzed as a work and as a text. Simply to state, something is ‘a work’ if it is concrete and occupies some space in book (in a library for an instance). It is a finished and countable object. And a text on the other hand is a “methodological field, which is only experienced only when working on it, in production.” A work is believed to contain number of meanings hidden on it, which are found on being read. So texts remain inside the works and diverse readers get to perceive it in diverse circumstances.…

    • 1600 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays