Preview

Feudal Society: The Communist Manifesto By Karl Marx

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1007 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Feudal Society: The Communist Manifesto By Karl Marx
Karl Marx wrote in 1848, "The history of all hitherto existing society is the history of class struggles"; it still holds true today. Feudal society gave way to democracy, yet the class stratification only intensified. As Marx states "Society as a whole is more and more splitting up into two great hostile camps…the Bourgeoisie and Proletariat," or in today's terminology, the have and have-nots. The growing middle and lower classes in America cannot compete with the "old wealth" of the upper class. Some entrepreneurs, who were in the right place at the right time, have managed to climb the social ladder and enter the bourgeoisie. An individual born today is more likely to move down the ladder rather than up. Marx addressed that possibility by stating, "What the bourgeoisie therefore produces, above all, are its own grave diggers." The bourgeoisie gain strength through political advances at the expense of the proletariat.
The United States Senate, the Millionaires Club, as well as
…show more content…
Many individual groups, African-Americans for example, have managed to become a legitimate part of the proletariat but not destroy the bourgeoisie. In America the proletariat is expanding even more, but with gaining power. Marx states," The lower middle class, the small manufacturer, the shopkeeper, the artisan…all fight against the bourgeoisie, to save from extinction their existence as fractions of the middle class." Another bourgeoisie establishment, Wal-Mart, is driving the "mom and pop" shops into extinction while keeping their employees in the proletariat. Wal-Mart is the epitome of Marx's description of the bourgeoisie converting people into an exchange value. An employee is only worth what he produces. By outsourcing, Wal-Mart is proving, at least to the bourgeoisie, that this aspect of the Communist manifesto holds true still

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Feudalism Dbq Essay

    • 605 Words
    • 3 Pages

    At the fall of Roman Empire, was the beginning of the Middle Ages in which the fuedal system was used. Feudalism was a political system in which nobles are granted the use of land that legally belongs to their kings in exchange for their loyalty, military services and protection of the people who were on the land. After the fall of rome there was a great decline in trade through out europe. The christian church ruled the major part of life in government and religion along with the weak central government of the king and nobles. The fuedal social pyramid consisted of different levels of people.…

    • 605 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The bourgeoisie, as Marx has described them are not revolutionary simply because it is in their best interest for things to remain as they are. For the workers, both socially and geographically divided; a gap that is constantly fluctuating in modern times, to compete for smaller and smaller wages that are losing their…

    • 1065 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    During the Industrial Revolution, factory workers received little pay, worked long hours, and never saw improvement in their living and working conditions. In the mean time, the middle class was emerging. They were rich because of the enormous amounts of money created in the country because of the Industrial Revolution. Marx thought that the capitalist system would eventually fail. He described communism as “a form of complete socialism in which the means of production--all land, mines, factories, railroads, and businesses—would be owned by the people” (649). He also thought all goods and services should be shared equally.…

    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Marx and Engels wrote, "The history of all hitherto existing society is the history of class struggles," meaning that during and throughout history there is always a constant oppression between the oppressor and oppressed. Each time the fight ends in either a revolutionary reconstruction of society, including a destruction of a particular class.…

    • 528 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    United State Labor History

    • 1563 Words
    • 7 Pages

    When one considers the effect that the Industrial Revolutions of the 19th and early 20th century, the workers whose backs bore it are seldom reflected upon. It becomes ponderous whether the revolution was a boon or a malediction upon the working class and if they were truly aided by the great rise in standard of living that hallmarked this time. Those who would defend the period would cite pre-Industrialization scenarios, toiling under feudal lords with no future beyond death and an unmarked grave. An opponent of this idea, such as the renowned Karl Marx, would state, 'The modern bourgeois society that has sprouted from the ruins of feudal society has not done away with class antagonisms. It has but established new classes, new conditions of oppression, and new forms of struggle in place of the old ones.…

    • 1563 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Before underlining the differences in economic growth and treatment of labour between capitalism and the earlier feudal system, it is necessary to understand the meaning of capitalism and feudalism separately.…

    • 1433 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The myths Mantsios describes come from false perceptions that the average citizen does not choose to challenge. These ideas are popular and hardly questioned. Social classes today are recognized as being somewhat old fashioned or a thing of the past. However, does this idea still hold true? Mantsios points out facts taken from studies that show the exact opposite. According to Mantsios, America has the largest distance in income level distribution compared to any other industrialized nation (308). He states, “Sixty percent of the American population holds less than 6 percent of the nation’s wealth” (308). He uses these two statistics, as well as many others, to make it difficult to argue that classes don’t exist.…

    • 666 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    marx and carnegie

    • 1118 Words
    • 4 Pages

    For centuries, many philosophers have discussed the issue of class struggle. Karl Marx and Andrew Carnegie both developed theories of the unequal distribution of wealth a long time ago; however the only Carnegie’s ideology could apply to American society today. In “The Communist Manifesto”, Marx first introduces the two main social classes: bourgeois (the upper class) and proletarians (the lower class or working class). He points out the revolution of industrialism has made changes of Capitalism to Communism. He suggests that the rich should redistribute property evenly because the proletarians have put a lot effort contributing in the revolution. In contrast, Carnegie analyzes in “The Gospel of Wealth”, the unequal distribution of wealth is a natural consequence of civilization. Both Marx and Carnegie present the problem within society because they want to contribute their own experiences from various views to resolve the tension between the rich and poor efficiently.…

    • 1118 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jessica Freeland HIS 102 Mr. Wiest March 4, 2018 Envisioning World Civilizations 23.1 Karl Marx and Friedrich Englels, "The Communist Manifesto" What was meant by "The history of all hitherto existing society is the history of class struggles. " Is that all social history shows a constant struggle between the First class and working class. The working class has always struggled to merely survive. What makes the current struggle differ from before the Bourgeoisie and Proletariat formed is that the ancient and medieval society had oppressed the slaves and the poorest plebeians and laborers.…

    • 926 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Communist Manifesto

    • 328 Words
    • 2 Pages

    If one truly studies this, they would find that there is a huge spectrum attached to the class system in the United States, classes such as working-middle to upper-middle do exist. Therefore, it wouldn’t be right to flat out categorize our society into just these two groups. Marx stated that “What the capitalist therefore produces, above all, are its own grave-diggers” (7), which I disagree with. This is because, unfortunately, even though “Proletarians” outnumber the Capitalists, I don’t believe that they would ever be able to out rule the Capitalists. The wealth that these capitalists obtain are capable of gathering enough resources that would within themselves out number us, therefore, this unequal income distribution is something that only the government should take action on. But then again, I don’t see our country getting to a point where one group needs to turn against the…

    • 328 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    As the title would suggest in this essay I intend to discuss the widening gap between the Bourgeoisie and Proletariat in today’s world. In a contemporary context I would take this to mean the widening gap between rich and poor and the economic inequality that continues to plague our world. In order to look at the situation in our present day we must first get an idea of what this divide means. In Marx’s day the term Bourgeoisie described a social class characterized by the ownership of capital, they were the rich industrialists who exploited the ‘Proletariat’ for their labour in order to amass great wealth. The Proletariat were the lower, working classes who in Marx’s view could ‘live only so long as they find work, and who find work only so long as their labour increases capital. These labourers, who must sell themselves piecemeal, are a commodity, like every other article of commerce.’ (1848) Today’s inequality follows a similar pattern, though perhaps a more complicated one.…

    • 1223 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    All throughout history, there has always been a sense of hierarchy in society such as the elites over the peasants, aristocrats over plebeians, etc. Although there was much societal change in the time of revolution, this subordination of classes did not. Sprouted from feudal society, bourgeois continues the division of societal classes: Bourgeoisie and Proletariat.…

    • 250 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Feudal System

    • 432 Words
    • 2 Pages

    There is no great character with whom Feudalism is especially identified. It was an institution of the Middle Ages, which grew out of the miseries and robberies that succeeded the fall of the Roman Empire. With the collapse of the Carolingian Kingdom/Holy Roman Empire in the 9th century, Europeans entered what many consider the core period of the Medieval age - the Central Middle Ages. This age is also described as the "feudal" period in European history. Feudalism is a term we have used before. Feudalism means a situation where there is no dominant political power or effective central leadership. In other words, there is no state or empire. Local leaders control political decisions, command the military power, have the controlling economic power and even dominate in the cultural realm. In a feudal society, power is treated as private possession; there is no effective state.…

    • 432 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to Marx and Engels the entire history of human society is the history of class stratification and oppression of those who occupy the lowest rung of the social hierarchy. The modern bourgeois society did not eliminate class conflicts; it rather strengthened it turning economic factor and ownership to the main cause of social stratification of people. As a result, class stratification, according to Marx and Engels, in the modern world is increasingly approaching its apogee - the division of society into two great opposing camps - the bourgeoisie and the proletariat.…

    • 795 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    “The history of all hitherto existing society is the history of class struggles.” (Tucker, 1978). These words began one of the most famous pieces Karl Marx ever wrote, The Communist Manifesto. In this work, he railed against what he perceived to be the evils of capitalism and called upon the workers around the world to unite to bring an end to this exploitative system once and for all. Communism was to rise and free all people from the shackles of the bourgeoisie and allow them to go on with their lives, as they pleased, in peace and happiness. As we all now know, this has yet to become a reality for most countries around the world. There have been cases where communism was implemented, some more successfully than others, but never en masse. So, how do the words of Marx relate to our society in the U.S. today?…

    • 1459 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays