Preview

marx and carnegie

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1118 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
marx and carnegie
My Ma
English 1A
Prof. James Click
2-19-2014

The Problem of Rich and Poor
For centuries, many philosophers have discussed the issue of class struggle. Karl Marx and Andrew Carnegie both developed theories of the unequal distribution of wealth a long time ago; however the only Carnegie’s ideology could apply to American society today. In “The Communist Manifesto”, Marx first introduces the two main social classes: bourgeois (the upper class) and proletarians (the lower class or working class). He points out the revolution of industrialism has made changes of Capitalism to Communism. He suggests that the rich should redistribute property evenly because the proletarians have put a lot effort contributing in the revolution. In contrast, Carnegie analyzes in “The Gospel of Wealth”, the unequal distribution of wealth is a natural consequence of civilization. Both Marx and Carnegie present the problem within society because they want to contribute their own experiences from various views to resolve the tension between the rich and poor efficiently.
By eliminating the gap between rich and poor, Marx believes Communism should replace the economic system of Capitalism. In his perspective, he claims, “They have nothing to lose but their chains. They have a world to win. Working men of all countries, unite” (Marx 476). Because he sees the Capitalist system exploits workers who are unfairly treated, he asserts that the proletarians should become the ruling class. The principle of Communism is the ideology of collectivism. Marx states, “Communism deprives no man of the power to appropriate the products of society: all that it does is to deprive him of the power to subjugate the labor of others by means of such appropriation” (470). This means that no private property should be allowed, and no one has even a less or more power in a Communist society. Because Marx illustrates the property ownership would enhance greed, and ambition to win in the



Cited: Carnegie, Andrew. “The Gospel of Wealth.” A World of Ideas: Essential Reading for College Writers. Ninth Ed. Eds. Lee A. Jacobus. Boston: Bedford/ St. Martins, 2013. 485-495. Print. Marx, Karl. “The Communist Manifesto.” A World of Ideas: Essential Reading for College Writers. Ninth Ed. Eds. Lee A. Jacobus. Boston: Bedford/ St. Martins, 2013. 456-476. Print.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Cited: Halsall, P. (1997, August). Modern history sourcebook: Andrew Carnegie: The gospel of wealth, 1889. Retrieved June 9, 2008, from The Internet Modern History Sourcebook: http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/mod/1889carnegie.html…

    • 731 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Gospel of Wealth: Carnegie’s philosophy that the millionaire had a duty to distribute wealth while still alive.…

    • 347 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marx’s plan for reforming society may be more tangible than Kuyper’s, but his plan uses rather cruel and destructive tactics. For instance, Marx believes that the family has become an instrument of oppression and should be eliminated. Marx’s plan for consolidating the family directly contradicts biblical principles and is no less than an attempt to undermine God’s authority. Marx believes the family is merely a product of the class system and not a God ordained institution. Besides Marx’s cruel elimination of the family, his plan further feeds man’s greed and selfishness. Communism’s prohibition of private property claims to produce economic equality. However, this notion seems only to further feed man unhealthy relationship with the material world and denies God his rightful place of power. Without God’s moral authority, man is left to reshape society as he sees fit but at the cost of losing all that is good. After examining Marx argument, the idea of communism does not seem to present an effective solution for resolving poverty in either Marx’s day or in the twenty-first…

    • 897 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Andrew Carnegie has a very unique perspective pertaining to the wealth in America and its distribution. Not only is he concerned about how much money is put to good use, but when; such as if the person donating the money is in life or after death. The “Gospel of Wealth” brings perspective of the nation’s money recirculation and the worth of a man by his generosity while living.…

    • 636 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Andrew Carnegie, born in Scotland, came to the United States in 1848. Here he started with nothing and turned himself into a self-made man. He was in fact, one of the richest men if this era. In 1889 he wrote “The Gospel of Wealth”. In this essay he discusses philanthropy and explains that with money also comes responsibility. He stated that obedience [to the Gospel of Wealth] will one day solve the problem of the rich and poor, and will bring “Peace on earth, among men good will.” I agree with this statement because the “Gospel of Wealth” claims that everyone is free to make as much money as they can, however, they should not leave it to their heirs and should use it to help mankind.…

    • 412 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Frued vs Marx

    • 2180 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Marx believes that man is naturally good, but the ownership of property has brought about aggression and selfishness. In other words, over time private property and money have corrupted man. Marx points out that throughout history, classes have existed, but were based on "feudal, patriarchal, and idyllic relations." Tradition and family relations determine a person's class. In the capitalistic society, however, only the ownership of property, the "naked self-interest… cash payment," determines one's class. Marx describes the continuous conflict as an ongoing trend of class struggles. When many take a look at society they notice that with in classes there's always the oppressors and oppressed in continuous hostility towards each other. However, when this phenomenon ends it is normally a rebellious way.…

    • 2180 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    As one of the major systems of stratification, class is based on ownership of resources and on the type of work that people do. Marx and Webber acknowledged social class as a determinant of social inequality and social change. For Marx, people’s wealth determines their class position. The stratification of society into different social groups results in disparity in income and wealth and uneven access to available goods and services. People with high income or wealth have more opportunity to control their own lives. People with less income have fewer life chances and must spend their restricted resources to obtain basic living requirements.…

    • 1699 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The history of mankind has been history of oppressor-oppressed and the class struggle between two major classes during Marx’s time, which were bourgeois and proletariat. Bourgeois, a class that monopolized a large mass of production, oppressed the working class, proletariat. According to The Communist Manifesto, private bourgeois property contributes greatly to inequality among different social classes. Marx supported communism, which he believed in the abolition of private bourgeois property and it was the only solution to end class struggle. With this solution, everyone eventually because proletariat. Freedom of individuals to acquire personal property is important to civil society. It builds competition among people and is one of the reasons why people work hard to be prosperous. This would also contribute to the economic growth. Without the right of personal property, everyone would depend on others and lack of motivation to improve themselves and the society as a whole. The one who works hard should deserve…

    • 405 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Marx class theory derived from his belief that class divisions are not found in all forms of society; classes are a creation of history. For Marx, classes are defined and structured by firstly, who owns or has property and means of production and who does the work in the production process, secondly the social relationships included in work and labour, and thirdly who produces and who rules the surplus human social labour can produce. All of these aspects of Marx class theory will be further explored in this essay.…

    • 1546 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    This explains Marx and Engels' view that Communism is not about abolishing all private property, but is meant to change private property into common property, thereby changing the dynamic of capitalistic labor to communistic labor, for the good and advancement of all.…

    • 770 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    [1] Marvin Perry et al Sources of the Western Tradition Vol. II (NY: Houghton Mifflin Company Co, 2006), 184.…

    • 1106 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Karl Marx is known for his theories of class. Most people associate him with the issue of class conflict. His concept about the social opposing factions, in which their distinction is fundamental in the way things usually happen, represents one of the aspects of Marxism. Unlike the sociologists’ description of social class with reference to lower, middle, and upper classes, Marx presented a different understanding of social class. He defined social class as an economic class wherein a person’s membership is determined by his or her relationship to the means of production. A person’s status in the social structure is established based on the capitalist system. His viewpoint is reasonable because at that time, the social class structure transformed…

    • 563 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marx’s theories of society developed around what he considered an unfair and unjust society in which two classes existed, determined by the coincidence of birth, which Marx coined the bourgeois, the owners of the means of production, and the proletariat, the wage earning laborers who become alienated from their work due to social constraints. Marx believed in historical materialism and class struggle, demonstrating that the private ownership of the means of production enabled the bourgeois to maintain power over the larger, powerless proletariats who provided the labor for the means of production. As a repercussion of this disparity of power Marx concluded social and moral problems were inherent to a capitalist system, which forced competition and created unnecessary antagonisms, essentially isolating the proletariat in their social position for generations.…

    • 6939 Words
    • 28 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marx Theory of Alienation

    • 393 Words
    • 2 Pages

    ive, rich people use the poor as commodities. He also explained that the profit that owners earn is not justly distributed to the nation as a whole. Marx’s Estranged Labor and Private Property and Communism explain the alienation of the laborer caused by private property and how it will bring the downfall of capitalism. Marx believed in communism which is a perfect life for all the individuals. In ancient times, people would live in caves and depended on nature to survive and fulfill their everyday needs. However, with time world modernized, people moved on and money became the main aspect of everyone’s life. In order to stay in power, money is very important. People give more value to money than themselves because money is what makes a person’s value. Money can buy happiness even though people spend most of their lives working for others.…

    • 393 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Theories of Karl Marx

    • 1417 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Karl Marx, also a philosopher was popularly known for his theories that best explained society, its social structure, as well as the social relationships. Karl Marx placed so much emphasis on the economic structure and how it influenced the rest of the social structure from a materialistic point of view. Human societies progress through a dialectic of class struggle, this means that the three aspects that make up the dialectic come into play, which are the thesis, antithesis and the synthesis (Avineri, 1980: 66-69). As a result of these, Marx suggests that in order for change to come about, a class struggle has to first take place. That is, the struggle between the proletariat and the capitalist class, the class that controls the means of production. Karl Marx also believed that this king of class stratification would be replaced by a more equal society known as communism. Therefore this theory rests on the premise that says, “the history of all hitherto existing society is the history of class struggles.”…

    • 1417 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays