Preview

Fiedler Contigency Theory

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1663 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Fiedler Contigency Theory
Fiedler 's Contingency Theory of Leadership by Patrich Antoine
Managerial leadership has influenced organizational activities in many ways. These influences include motivating subordinates, budgeting scarce resources, and serving as a source of communication. Over the years researchers have emphasized the influences of leadership on the activities of subordinates. These emphasis by researchers led to theories about leadership. "The first and perhaps most popular, situational theory to be advanced was the ‘Contingency Theory of Leadership Effectiveness ' developed by Fred E. Fiedler" (Bedeian, Glueck 504). This theory explains that group performance is a result of interaction of two factors. These factors are known as leadership style and situational favorableness. These two factors will be discussed along with other aspects of Fiedler 's theory. "In Fiedler 's model, leadership effectiveness is the result of interaction between the style of the leader and the characteristics of the environment in which the leader works" (Gray, Starke 264).
The first major factor in Fiedler 's theory is known as the leadership style. This is the consistent system of interaction that takes place between a leader and work group. "According to Fiedler, an individual 's leadership style depends upon his or her personality and is, thus, fixed" (Bedeian, Gleuck 504). In order to classify leadership styles, Fiedlers has developed an index called the least-preferred coworker (LPC) scale.
The LPC scale asks a leader to think of all the persons with whom he or she has ever worked, and then to describe the one person with whom he or she worked the least well with. This person can be someone form the past or someone he or she is currently working with. From a scale of 1 through 8, leader are asked to describe this person on a series of bipolar scales such as those shown below:
Unfriendly 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Friendly
Uncooperative 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Cooperative
Hostile 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8



Bibliography: Bedeian, Arthur G., and William F. Gleuck. Management: Third Edition. Chicago: Dreyden Press, 1983. Dunham, Randall B. Organizational Behavior. Homewood, Illinois: Richard D. Irwin, 1984. Gannon, Martin J. Management: An Integrated Framework. Boston: Little, Brown, 1982. Gray, Jerry L., and Frederick A. Starke. Organizational Behavior: Concepts and Applications. Columbus, Ohio: Merril, 1988. By Patrick Antoine

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Schermerhorn, J. R., Hunt, J. G., & Osborn, R. N. (2005). Organizational Behavior. 9th edition,…

    • 1552 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Case Study: Two Coaches

    • 932 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Fiedler’s contingency model is designed to help the leader be interactive with their subordinates. The contingency model suggest that it can be determined if they will be effective in a specific setting. The two coaches that are in the case studies are effective in their approach to leadership when it comes to producing winning teams. After carefully reviewing both coaches situation it was obvious that Coach Knight would score low in the LPCs, this low score would mean that he was task driven. Then there is Coach Krzyzewski, he fits the situation where he would score a high LPC because he is motivated through relationships. Both coaches are matched well with their situation. For an example, Coach Knight¸ the highly successful basketball coach confirms Fiedler’s contingency because he is consistent in his leadership approach. Coach Knight’s intense and task-oriented technique seems unvarying. He intensely argues with referees during games and gets very upset to the point where he acts out during games. Coach Knight’s primary goal was to accomplish the task at hand and his minor needs were to build relationships while getting along with others. On the other hand, there is Coach Krzyzewski who spent time getting into his players head in order to understand their…

    • 932 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    6. A theory that emphasizes leader traits and skills as determinants of leadership behavior is best categorized at what level?…

    • 705 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Apollo 13 Video Clip

    • 405 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Cited: Organizational Behavior: 13th Ed., Dan Hellriegel, and John W. Slocum, Jr., South-Western College Publishing, Cinncinnati, OH…

    • 405 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Fiedler put forward his situational theory in 1958. He proposed that leadership was dependent upon the situation and assumed that all leaders are affected by an inherent set of leadership behaviours, which he believed was difficult to change. He identified two basic leadership styles which were task or relationship orientated. According to Tulsian and Pandey (2008) leaders who are task orientated will perform at the best level when they are in favourable or highly unfavourable situations, whereas leaders who are relationship orientated will perform best when they are in situations of medium…

    • 818 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Nelson, D.L., Quick, J.C. (2006). Organizational behavior. Foundations, Realities, & Challenges (5th ed.) p. 318…

    • 1115 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    However, this method shows only the individual's emotional reactions to the people they cannot work with and It doesn't allow for leadership flexibility,…

    • 498 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Teacher

    • 773 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In reviewing Transformational and Transactional Leadership characteristics, the score 24 and 26, respectively, describes a leader/manager…

    • 773 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Best Essays

    Leadership Style

    • 1574 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The situational variables include leader-member relations, task structure and positional power (Northouse, 2007). Leader-member relations are characterized as good or poor depending on feelings found in the group atmosphere, relationships and trust. Although there is no scale for the task structure, the situational variable in the model, there is a clear definition of the term. The variable is operationalized by high structure and low structure. Position power is characterized by the authority a leader has to deliver the proverbial carrot or the stick, i.e. rewards and punishments (Northouse, 2007).…

    • 1574 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Schermerhorn, J. R., Hunt, J. G., & Osborn, R. N. (2005). Organizational Behavior (9th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley &…

    • 1288 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    A leader’s orientation can be described by measuring the “esteem of the least preferred co-worker” scale (Chemers & Skrzypek, 1972, p. 172). This scale, developed by Feidler, “asks the individual to think of all of the individuals with whom he has ever worked and to rate the one person with whom he could work least well” (Chemers & Skrzypek, 1972, p. 172). Based on how the “least preferred…

    • 1222 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Leadership

    • 5470 Words
    • 15 Pages

    Fiedler (1967) explored the idea that there was not just one ultimate style of leadership for a given circumstance, but leaders would be more effective by varying their leadership style depending on the situations that faced them. So It is evident from the theories that every leader exhibits numerous leadership styles and traits at different point in time.…

    • 5470 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Fiedler's Contingency Theory

    • 2954 Words
    • 12 Pages

    The basis of Fiedler's contingency model involved assessing a potential leader with a scale of work style ranging from…

    • 2954 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Nelson, D. L., & Quick, J. C. (2011). Organizational Behavior (7th ed.). Mason, OH: South-…

    • 1706 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Richard Branson - Paper

    • 1358 Words
    • 4 Pages

    By using Fiedler’s Contingency Theory, we can analyze the relationship between Branson’s leadership orientation and group performance. This is accomplished by determining Branson’s leadership orientation, specific situational elements, and the leader orientation that was found to be most effective as the control level changes.…

    • 1358 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays