Final Dissertation on Corporate Governance in Uganda
THE WILLIAM DAVIDSON INSTITUTE
AT THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN
Financial Deregulation and Economic Growth in the Czech Republic, Hungary and Poland
By: Patricia Mc Grath
William Davidson Institute Working Paper Number 804 November 2005
Financial Deregulation and Economic Growth in the Czech Republic, Hungary and Poland
Literature Review Extraction from PhD in Economics submitted to the Institute of Technology, Tralee, Co. Kerry, Ireland by Patricia Mc Grath Contact: pmcgrath_bitc@eircom.net
Abstract Advocates of financial regulation, Arestis and Demetriades, argue that financial liberalisation does not impact on financial market efficiency and the allocation of investment. Results in this study find that Czech, Hungarian and Polish firms are subject to scrutiny when applying for credit. The firm’s ability to provide collateral, the potential of the proposed investment project and individual financial backgrounds are all factors that are used before loans are offered, and it likely that allocational efficiency is strengthened in these circumstances, and not weakened. Stiglitz has the view that financial repression improves the quality of the pool of loans. Results here indicate that companies in these countries previously had very limited access to credit while government owned companies and government projects received the bulk of credit. After
deregulation it became apparent that the quality of the pool of loans was very poor. This study supports Shaw’s assertion that financial deregulation improves financial deepening.
JEL codes: Keywords:
G, G2, G21 Transition Economies, Industrial Development, Financial Deregulation,
Economic Growth, Eastern Europe
Financial Deregulation and Economic Growth in the Czech Republic, Hungary and Poland Review of the Literature
1.0
Introduction
The following is an extract from my PhD on Financial Deregulation and Economic Growth in the Czech Republic, Hungary and Poland.
The debate on
AT THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN
Financial Deregulation and Economic Growth in the Czech Republic, Hungary and Poland
By: Patricia Mc Grath
William Davidson Institute Working Paper Number 804 November 2005
Financial Deregulation and Economic Growth in the Czech Republic, Hungary and Poland
Literature Review Extraction from PhD in Economics submitted to the Institute of Technology, Tralee, Co. Kerry, Ireland by Patricia Mc Grath Contact: pmcgrath_bitc@eircom.net
Abstract Advocates of financial regulation, Arestis and Demetriades, argue that financial liberalisation does not impact on financial market efficiency and the allocation of investment. Results in this study find that Czech, Hungarian and Polish firms are subject to scrutiny when applying for credit. The firm’s ability to provide collateral, the potential of the proposed investment project and individual financial backgrounds are all factors that are used before loans are offered, and it likely that allocational efficiency is strengthened in these circumstances, and not weakened. Stiglitz has the view that financial repression improves the quality of the pool of loans. Results here indicate that companies in these countries previously had very limited access to credit while government owned companies and government projects received the bulk of credit. After
deregulation it became apparent that the quality of the pool of loans was very poor. This study supports Shaw’s assertion that financial deregulation improves financial deepening.
JEL codes: Keywords:
G, G2, G21 Transition Economies, Industrial Development, Financial Deregulation,
Economic Growth, Eastern Europe
Financial Deregulation and Economic Growth in the Czech Republic, Hungary and Poland Review of the Literature
1.0
Introduction
The following is an extract from my PhD on Financial Deregulation and Economic Growth in the Czech Republic, Hungary and Poland.
The debate on
Bibliography: Backhaus, J.G. “Mass Privatisation in Central and East European Countries”, Journal of Economic Studies, Volume 30, No 3, MCB University Press, 2003, pp196-204 Barth, J.R Becsi, Zsolt. And Wang, Ping. “Financial Development and Growth”, Federal Reserve, Bank of Atlanta, Economic Review, Fourth Quarter, 1997, pp46-59 Berkowitz, D.W “Financial Market Deregulation”, Economic Report of the President, prepared by the Council of Economic Advisers”, American Banker, Volume 149, P5(9), 1984, March 13, pp6 Fitzgerald, E.V.K Griffith-Jones, S and Drabek, Z, Financial Reform in Central and Eastern Europe, New York, St Martin’s Press, 1995, pp179-220 Guasch, J Jackson, J and Mach, B. “Job Creation, Destruction and Transition in Poland, 1988-1998: panel evidence”, William Davidson Institute, University of Michigan Business School, Working Paper, No 502, June 2002 Jurajda, S King, R.G. and Levine, R. “Finance and Growth: Schumpter Might be Right”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1993a, 108, pp717-738 Kirby, D.A Kocenda, E. and Svenjar, J. “The Impact of Czech Mass Privatisation on Corporate Governance”, MCB University Press, Journal of Economic Studies, Vol 30, No ¾, 2003, pp278293 Levine, Ross McKinnon, Ronald. Money and Capital in Economic Development, Chapter 7: Financial Repression and Inflation, Washington D.C., The Brookings Institution, 1973, pp68-69 34