Preview

First Securities Company of Chicago

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
799 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
First Securities Company of Chicago
The critical issue in this case study is the responsibility of auditor. Should Ernst & Ernst be civilly liable for defrauded investors of First Securities Company of Chicago under Securities Exchange Act of 1934 under Rule 10b-5.

 According to Securities Exchange Act of 1934 under Rule 10b-5, plaintiff which was the defrauded investor Hochfelder needed to prove that Ernst & Ernst intentionally manipulate the escrows investors.
 Ernst & Ernst had audited First Securities Company of Chicago for two decades, Ernst & Ernst should have noticed Nay's "mail rule" policy could lead to potential internal control weakness and misleading financial statement.
 Defrauded investors were not properly informed or obtained information about the securities they invested in "escrow syndicate" account which Nay personally dealt with.
 Since Nay was the president of First Securities Company of Chicago and he only dealt with his closest friends whom trusted Nay fully, it was hard to detect by others that Nay made these outside deals with his friends.

Questions
1. Under present technical standards, would auditors be required to disclose a company policy similar to Nay's mail rule that they discover during an audit? Explain. Assuming such disclosure had been required at the time this case took place, would that disclosure have resulted in the mail rule being discontinued?
Under present technical standards, auditors are required to disclose company policy similar to Nay's mail rule, and it's important for auditor to be aware and further investigate unreasonable or doubtful company policy if it leads to internal control weakness or possibly fraud scheme. They are also required to report their assessment of internal controls and their opinion on management's assessment of internal control over financial reporting. If such disclosure had been required at the time this case took place, I believe the mail rule could be discontinued since it can lead to

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the case Reeves v. Ernst & Young there was an agricultural cooperative entitled Security the Farmer’s Cooperative of Arkansas and Oklahoma that numerous members (23,000). In order to raise money to support its general business operations, they sold to investors promissory notes that were payable upon demand. This note was showcased to all including members and non-members and noted that it was an “investment program” and offered higher interest rates. Co-op accumulated more than 1,600 people that purchased the notes, totaling $10 million but later Co-op filed for bankruptcy. There was a law suit filed by a class of holders stating that there was a violation of Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. When considering the…

    • 238 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Zzzbest

    • 2259 Words
    • 10 Pages

    A. As the successor auditor, what was E&W supposed to do before they accepted ZZZZ Best as an audit client in regards to Greenspan? Summarize in enough detail AU 315.03-.06. In your answer give and support your opinion as to whether or not E&W violated these paragraphs and if you can prove it as a fact.…

    • 2259 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Facts: Touche(defendant), a public accounting firm was hired by Fred Stern & Co. to audit its record and to prepare and certify a balance sheet exhibiting Fred Stern financial health. Touche was aware that this balance sheet would be shown by Fred Stern to shareholders and banks for financial dealing. Touch certified greater assets than liabilities to be in excess of $1million of which in fact the business was actually insolvent and the statement prepared by Fred Stern was false. Fred Stern said nothing to Touche about the specific institution and the type of transactions it would be used. Relying on Touches independent audit, Ultramares (plaintiff) extended several loans to Fred Stern and when Fred Stern collapsed, Ultramares was unable to…

    • 650 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Case Brief

    • 797 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Facts: The plaintiff, Stoneridge Investment Partners, LLC, presented a securities fraud class action against the defendant, Charter Communications’ vendors, Scientific-Atlanta. Charter communications is a publicly traded cable company that services millions of customers throughout America. Charter contracts with vendors for equipment that is used for their company. Charter had Scientific-Atlanta sell set-top cable boxes at a higher price than the normal selling price. Scientific-Atlanta also sold advertisement at a rate four to five times higher than normal rates. These abnormally increased rates caused inflation in Charter’s stock price. Stoneridge Investment Partners also claimed that Charter Communications wanted Scientific-Atlanta to purchase advertising on its networks just to enhance their revenue. Stoneridge Investment Partners sued both Charter and Scientific-Atlanta under section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The claims against all other defendants other than Scientific-Atlanta were resolved. The District Court had to decide whether or not Scientific-Atlanta was a primary violator of the relevant statutes.…

    • 797 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Case Study 7.8

    • 1786 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Leston Nay, the President of First Securities Company of Chicago, had deceived investors into participating into a fund called the escrow syndicate and continuously cheated them into thinking…

    • 1786 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Did Emerson violate Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and SEC Rule 10b-5? Why or why not?…

    • 576 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Until the case of Ultramares Corp. v. Touche, auditors admitted no liability whatsoever to third parties. The judgment in Ultramares reaffirmed the principle that a fraudulent accountant, not a negligent one, would be liable to third parties misled by his or her statements. This case has had an impact on the work of auditors in terms of the care they exercise in preparing the auditor's report. Coercive forces compelled auditors to adopt behaviors to do what it takes to protect them from third-party liability by producing high-quality work.…

    • 2185 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In District Court, Plaintiffs alleged securities fraud by claiming that Defendants violated Rule 10b-5 by making material misstatements about the value of the C-US profits interests and a tax “gross up” to induce Plaintiffs’ continued employment at Covis Pharmaceuticals, Am. Compl. ¶ 23. By the failure to pursue it in their opening brief, the plaintiffs abandoned the theory of securities fraud. Regardless, under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act…

    • 650 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Acc/325 Phase 2

    • 983 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Without the security of confidence, auditors would become the enemy. It is highly ethical that auditors never share information or records to anyone that does not have the legal right of disclosure. Private information should never be used for the personal advantage of the…

    • 983 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In section 11 of the securities act of 1933 the auditors have the burden of proof and in the securities exchange act of 1934 section 18 the plaintiffs have the burden of proof and auditors cannot be held liable for ordinary negligence. They must prove they suffered an economic loss, the financial statements contained a material misstatement, the loss was caused by reliance on the materially misstated statements, and auditors were aware that the financial statements contained a material misstatement. This difference exist because people would buy shares after they know that a company is going bankrupt and in making the burden of proof on the plaintiff it would take that away. In the SEC act of 1933 the plaintiffs only have to prove that they suffered an economic loss and the statements there were material misstatement. By having to show reliance on the statements it takes away a defense that the auditors had which is the causation defense. The defense for auditors in security exchange act of 1933 is due diligence or causation defense. In SEC act of 1934 it is good faith which is no knowledge of the material misstatement. Under common law auditors are liable to reasonably foreseeable third parties.…

    • 663 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ernst & Ernst argued that the mail rule was not relevant to its audits of First Securities since that rule only involved personal transactions of Nay and the escrow investors. Do you agree? Why or why not?…

    • 314 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Bernard Madoff

    • 1489 Words
    • 6 Pages

    References: A (Very Brief) Encyclopedia of Securities Fraud. (n.d.). Retrieved April 20, 2009, from http://www.abanet.org/buslaw/blt/2007-03-04/donley.shtml…

    • 1489 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    A. As the successor auditor, what was E&W suppose to do before they accepted ZZZZ Best as an audit client in regards to Greenspan? Summarize in enough detail Au 315.03-.06. In your answer give and support your opinion as to whether or not E&W violated these paragraphs and if you can prove it as a fact.…

    • 815 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    To Catch A Trader

    • 783 Words
    • 4 Pages

    ‘To Catch a Trader’ DR The documentary, To Catch a Trader, revolves around firms, stocks, and a concept known as insider trading. Insider trading is the illegal practice of trading stocks while having confidential non-public information. Material nonpublic information is any information that could reasonably be expected to affect the price of security and that information is not generally known or available to the public. The film starts off by explaining the concept of nonpublic information and this leads to a highly successful hedge funds firm named S.A.C. Capital Advisors. Hedge funds are a limited partnership of investors that uses high risk methods, such as investing with borrowed money, in hopes of realizing large capital gains.…

    • 783 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Under present technical standards, auditors are required to disclose company policy similar to Nay’s mail rule, and its import for auditor to be aware and further investigate unreasonable for doubtful company policy if it leads to internal control weakness or possibly fraud scheme. They are also required to report their assessment of internal controls and their opinion on management’s assessment of internal control over financial reporting. If such disclosure had been required at the time this case took place, I believe the mail rule could be…

    • 723 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays