Food Stamp Synthesis Essay

After going through all the sources and reviewing a lot of information on the food stamp system the main stasis that keeps coming up while reading through these articles is the stasis of evaluation. This stasis is one of the most predominate stases that come through from these sources. Most of the sources keep coming back to the stasis of evaluation because when you take a look at the food stamp system it ends up being evaluated over and over again. Seeing whether the whole food stamps system is an effective program for people who are on food stamps and trying to pull themselves out of poverty.
There is a huge range of stakeholders within the food stamp system. Some of the stakeholders within the food stamp system are the taxpayers, families,
Yet, I will make sure that when I am looking at all my sources and take in all the information that I have been given. I will do my best in trying not to base my opinion off of whether I align with one side or not. Take away all the bias in the sources and just look at the pure facts that are being presented.
Some of the sources that I have fit almost perfectly with the stasis of evaluation because they are taking a look at how effective the system can be. In the Carroll article, it takes an evaluative look at the food stamp system. Looking at how certain things can be applied to the program and cause the people on food stamps to change their habits. Carroll mentions a study that regulated what people on food stamps can and cannot buy. It is showing how effective the system can be if you add some sort of regulation to it.
Another article that fits this stasis is the CBPP article. It just takes a look at how effective the whole system is in general. It talks about how they changed the title to SNAP, Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, and this newer version of the food stamp program is much better than the last one. Both kind of agreeing in the fact that there needs to be some sort of reform to the system, whether new or just cleaning it