Preview

Forensic Fiber Evidence Essay

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
492 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Forensic Fiber Evidence Essay
In my opinion, the expert testimony in the case was extremely vital to the prosecution of this particular case. This is considering the fiber evidence was the most factual information that the prosecution had linking Wayne Williams to the bodies of the murder victims. By using the forensic experts in educating the jury on how distinctive fibers types can be, by using photos and charts ("Wayne Williams Trial: 1981 - Prosecutors Use Microscopic Analysis, Williams Takes The Stand, Suggestions For Further Reading"). They also brought the experts in the textile industry, and used them to back up the forensic experts on the types of fibers and the uniqueness of each company. The prosecutors used all this to make a strong case, and they did this by using the experts to break down the evidence into simple terms. In addition, having the photographs and charts to help the jury not only visualize, but being broke down to not so technical terms, just plain layman terms ("NCJRS Abstract - National Criminal Justice Reference Service").

As the prosecutor in this case, I would have started by determining exactly how much
…show more content…
I would instruct the forensic experts and the textile experts to explain their answer in a way that someone that has never study science or worked in are around carpet, would understand what they were talking about. This would be the only way that we would be able to convince the jury of the importance of the fibers to the murders and how it ties Wayne Williams to the crime.

References:

"Wayne Williams Trial: 1981 - Prosecutors Use Microscopic Analysis, Williams Takes The Stand, Suggestions For Further Reading". Law.jrank.org. N.p., 2017. Web. 4 June 2017.

"NCJRS Abstract - National Criminal Justice Reference Service". Ncjrs.gov. N.p., 2017. Web. 4 June

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    The court case was about The Ransom Of Red Chief. The teams defended the witnesses such as Red Chief, Sam, Bill. The prosecuting team believed that Bill didn’t get kidnapped by those two kidnappers. The defense team believed that Bill was mentally challenged and Red Chief did harm his kids and abuse the cat. The prosecuting team said that Red Chief was hounded down by those two kidnappers and lured in by some candy that they had hidden. They conjointly believed that they put her in a bag and yielded her into a little shed. The prosecuting team won the case by way of evidence. I believe that the defense team should have won by way of evidence from the trial.…

    • 121 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Lab Question Answers 02

    • 415 Words
    • 1 Page

    4. Why was forensic science important in Crippen's trial? How was it used in the trial?…

    • 415 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Crippen Case

    • 377 Words
    • 2 Pages

    4. Why was forensic science important in Crippen's trial? How was it used in the remains?…

    • 377 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Cupp Versus Murphy Brief

    • 1189 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Merits: The respondent, Daniel Murphy, was convicted by a jury in an Oregon court of the second-degree murder of his wife. The victim died by strangulation in her home in the city of Portland, and abrasions and lacerations were found on her throat. There was no sign of a break-in or robbery. Word of the murder was sent to the estranged husband, Daniel Murphy. Upon receiving the message, Murphy promptly telephoned the Portland police and voluntarily came into Portland for questioning. Shortly after the respondent’s arrival at the station house, where he was met by retained counsel, the police noticed a dark spot on the respondent’s finger. Suspecting that the spot might be dried blood and knowing that evidence of strangulation is often found under the assailant’s fingernails, the police asked Murphy if they could take a sample of scrapings from his fingernails. He refused. Under protest and without a warrant, the police proceeded to take the samples. After this evidence was collected, Murphy was released and was not formally “arrested” until approximately one month later. The samples turned out to contain traces of skin and blood cells, and fabric from the victim’s nightgown. This incriminating evidence was admitted at the trial over defense objections.…

    • 1189 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    01

    • 285 Words
    • 1 Page

    4. Why is evidence important in forensic science? What evidence was important in the episodes? Why?…

    • 285 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    9.06 Questions

    • 485 Words
    • 2 Pages

    2. If you were a forensic scientist and you were called to a crime scene to see if drugs were present, what would you do to determine this?…

    • 485 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Forensic Science Unit 4

    • 391 Words
    • 2 Pages

    What are the three types of fingerprints found in the human population? How often does each occur?…

    • 391 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    forensics

    • 449 Words
    • 2 Pages

    What physical evidence did you find at the victim’s home? A box of matches, a space heater, beer bottles, Natalie’s wallet, a V-shaped burn pattern, burned outlet, a protected surface on the ground, crazed glass, and a puddle-shaped burn pattern.…

    • 449 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It was stated that the prosecution was not able to present neither a murder weapon nor an eye witness at the trial. They also brought up that the DNA evidence could have been contaminated while in the lab. The way in which the victims were killed was consisted with those related to drug crimes, since they allegedly befriended a person that owed money to Columbian drug traffickers. Most importantly, OJ Simpson was physically unable to commit a crime of that sort because Ronald was a young man that would put up a fight, while OJ was a middle-aged man that suffered from chronic arthritis. Lastly, the single dark glove found t the crime scene was unable to fit OJ’s…

    • 502 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The collection and analysis of the evidence was straightforward and reliable. Although there was a difference in opinion of the bloodstain patterns and the seriousness of MacDonald’s injuries, they did not determine the case. Rather, it was the deficiencies in the investigation and the defense that lost Jeffrey MacDonald his freedom. A visual documentation of MacDonald’s wounds would have reinforced the extent of his injuries and could have convinced the jury of a different opinion. Additionally, if admissible, the suppressed hair and fiber evidence would have been damning to the prosecution’s case. And if the convincing testimonies of Heather Stoeckley and her friend were allowed and investigated, the jury may have viewed the entire case thru a different lens. Ultimately, America is still divided on this case. There are still those that believe justice was served, while others assert that the plethora of evidence was not given the proper light of day and that reasonable doubt should be a serious…

    • 1340 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Foresic Science

    • 1473 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Does it clearly present how this case changed forensic science or how the perpetrator evaded detection?…

    • 1473 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    .Oftentimes, paint and fiber evidence is overshadowed by the more glamorous DNA evidence in cases today. Paint and fiber evidence is sometimes discounted as being mediocre evidence, at best, by jurors. With your newfound knowledge of how important this type of evidence can be in criminal cases, take a moment to reflect on how your opinion of this evidence might have changed.…

    • 906 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Forensic Science

    • 567 Words
    • 3 Pages

    the soil is left on the shoe and the entire shoe is taken to the crime lab. The…

    • 567 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Scott Peterson Case

    • 1776 Words
    • 8 Pages

    There was a good amount of evidence used in the Scott Peterson trial by the prosecution but all of it was circumstantial with not one piece of hard evidence. Five key items of evidence that the prosecution used to sway the jury in convicting Scott Peterson were the defenses major blunder from Dr. Charles March, the missing cement, the affair with Amber Frey, the two tarps used on the fishing trip, and finally the ultimate break down of Petersons fishing alibi. The first key item of evidence and the straw that broke the camels back was the complete break down of the defenses key witness Dr. Charles March. Dr. March was brought to the trail as the defenses…

    • 1776 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    The innocence project and forensic science are two forms that can help determine who the actual preparatory was and can help people who have been wrongly convicted in a crime he/she did not commit. In many cases the forensic such as DNA, blood sample, or semen and other evidence that have been lost or even wrongly tested can end up becoming a big mistake that can send someone to jail that did not commit the crime. In the article, Forensic Problems and Wrongfully Convictions (2009) states that, the most wrongful convictions involve more than one contributing cases, for example, if an eyewitness may have wrongly identified an innocent person, and in the same case a forensic analyst may have testified that hairs from the crime scene match the defendant’s hair. In the jury’s eyes, the eyewitness testimony is strengthened by the forensic evidence (Forensic Problems and Wrongfully Convictions, 2009). Not always the eye witnesses are right with what they say so having the right forensic evidence can help with determine who is actually the perpetrator. Such as this case were the eyewitness was not so good and also a lot of the evidence was miss communicated.…

    • 1479 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays