Frankenstein: Nature vs Nurture

Twins are commonly used to study the effects of nature versus nurture. Ones immediate surroundings define who they become later on in life. The environment plays a huge role in the development of humanity through cultivating personality, character, beliefs, and many different aspects in a person’s life. Different environmental influences provide for a variety of people. In terms of the literary selection Frankenstein by Mary Shelley, the author’s view on Nature vs. Nurture is that the development of an individual revolves around nature.
Firstly, the creature conceals wantonly emotions due to the flagrant mistreatment of society. Frankenstein exclaims “The love of another will destroy the cause of my crimes, and I shall become a thing of whose existence everyone will be ignorant” (Shelley 106). If someone is being shown love and kindness, they will be prone to reciprocate these emotions. As Frankenstein is persuading Victor to create him a female he commiserates with humanity exclaiming, “I shall feel the affections of a sensitive being and become linked to the chain of existence and events, from which I am now excluded” (Shelley 106). Long term advantages for learning behavior and for the development of physical and mental health are obtained through stabilizing secure, receptive, and nourishing relationships. The creature learns this is early on in life which is beneficial, so he can carry out illustrious and consistent acts which is the key sustaining the foundation of a prevailing lifestyle. At first, the creature is destitute in expressing himself, however as he matures, he is able to manifest dissimilar emotions. Frankenstein verbally analyzes himself through concluding, “I am malicious because I am miserable. Am I not shunned and hated by all mankind” (Shelley 104). Learning through the acts of society and constantly being around certain attitudes attaches to the creature’s senses and he adapts. By virtue of observing and grasping certain ideals of