Analysis Of The Novel 'Nature Vs. Nurture In Frankenstein'

Nature vs. nurture develops a strong debate in psychology. It is made up of two independent dynamics with different approaches in behavioural changes. The two dynamics is made up of nature and nurture. There are no contentions that McLeod's tries to unravel technical differences between the two dynamics. In the novel frankenstein Nature expresses the external characteristics of human beings that are projected by genetic inheritance. It is difficult to alter changes in some external, internal characteristics that are developed by inheritance of particular genes. Nurture refers to external expressions developed by interaction of different environments and people. It is evident that nurture characteristic can be altered by the people. This is
because nurture characteristics are modifications that have no cognitive attachment to internal parts of the body. It is worth to argue according to McLeod psychology that nature plays a vital role that nurture. A person born with a certain characteristic is capable of developing nurture characteristics. However, it is difficult for a person with certain nurture characteristics to obtain nature characteristics. The logic behind the operation is found that nature traits are projected by certain traits incorporated in the genes. It was valid to argue that fusions of different chromosomes result in new traits in a person that is irreversible. In other words, genetic makeup is permanent in a person. Any attempt to alter the originality of the process may lead to a serious health effect. Unless it is alteration is made by responsible surgeons, no physicians are allowed to tamper with the original makeup of the body. Nature has therefore exhibited its supremacy