A critique of the book is included. The critique includes questions that the author should have addressed/considered. It should be about 1 page.…
Even though this story was captivating, there were a few troubling issues. The part that bugged me the most was in the middle of the book when the plot dragged a little. I just…
Although at times it was hard to follow what was exactly happening in the book. I felt like the book jumped around a lot because each chapter was a different event that happened throughout the year. I didn’t know when the events occurred so at times it was confusing. In addition, the book was older so it was hard to make connections with the book and my everyday life.…
It has very tough issues and a lot of language. This would be a book for upper middle school to high school. This is a book you would have to be very careful with, you would need a lot of parent permission and a class/student that you could have great discussion with. However, that is not to say that it is not worth reading. I think that a lot of students today have a hard time backing down from an issue, even if it is meaningless, so this could really be relatable. Some strategies that could be used with this book include predicting, inferring, and making connections. I think that inferring could be a great strategy for this book because you can use the pictures and the text to find out what the author is really…
I think that so far, the book is pretty good. It makes you want to keep reading, because it is about interesting things, but I find it very easy to read. This book…
Parts of the book I enjoyed and parts of the book I didn’t enjoyed. What I enjoyed about the book was the learning the history of humans and different societies. I enjoyed hearing about all these groups from the Polynesians to the Europeans. I was great reading how their geographical locations had such great impact on their diversity and advancement in history. Also I enjoyed hearing some of the real life experiences such as the authors trip to Australia because I could relate to the hot heat of it. With every book there are a few things I did not enjoy about it. First it was hard for me to follow it. Certain topics I did not understand and it seemed too lengthy to me. I know the author was supporting his thesis but I thought some parts weren’t as important as others. Which leads to that some parts of the book was very dull for me. This made me lose track of where I was, and what was going on. Overall I had mixed feelings on the book, both positive and…
I enjoyed going through the process of coming up with a hypothetical person and how to go through the steps on helping them, and staying organized with everything while helping them. I learned a lot from reading outside articles instead of just the book. This articles showed in depth how to help a client. Doing this process has shown me that it is a lot of work to stay on track with a client but that hard work will pay off because you will be organized which will make helping them even more…
After the first half, I jotted down some of the reasons why. Here is a list of problems I have with the book, most of which are either logical fallacies or just rhetorical stunts that annoy me.…
To add some positively to The Longman Reader I can say some important facts that they gave in the chapter are easy steps, but some people might not have known those. Other than that it shows us how we can look at books multiple ways. Not just one way. I like how this book has labeled sections in each of the chapters,…
Another problem is that this book had poor character development. Mary is referred as a criminal and leaving her town after killing her husband .Crabbe’s mom is clueless on what is going on with his son’s life, his dad is rude and ungrateful. His family does not show much support to his son. He’s addicted to alcohol and telling young grade 9’s to drink and always constantly drinking and in need of it 24/7 is horrible. Crabbe has also left home and running away is showing bad decisions to the youth. It’s giving those ideas on what to do if they hate there family or get depressed. This book is just setting bad examples towards the youth.…
As I first opened up the book I was less than pleased with what I was reading until I…
I felt that the textbooks readings weren’t necessary for the class. You could not read the assigned chapters because you would go over in class what exactly we needed to know for the exams. I didn’t read the chapters because you would do this, and I would do well on all the homework assignments without having read the chapters. The exams were pretty easy, especially since you gave us a review for each exam. I didn’t think they were too difficult, the short answer questions were the only ones that I ever had trouble on.…
I really liked the book. The book leaves a little more importance towards the horrible meatpacking industry than towards poverty suffered by the workers. I would recommend this book to everyone because of how interesting the details were and how eye opening it could be to many. I learned a lot from this book especially: being poor can ruin a family, immigrating to a new place to accomplish the American Dream can be a long rocky road, greed ruined thousands of lives and families, meatpacking industry killed and infected a lot of people, not giving up fully can lead to something good coming out of your life even when you’re left with nothing. The book relates to American History by being the cause of the FDA and hope to socialism. The outcome of the story was that nobody cared about the socialism expression, instead they focused on the atrocities of the meat factory and the exploitation of the workers. The book brought much needed attention to the atrocities. So much that Theodore Roosevelt read the novel. He was astounded at the conditions and made a quick move to fight them: Roosevelt established the Food and Drug Administration. The FDA regulated and inspected food products and helped bring an end to the exploitation of workers and unsanitary…
The authors of Freakonomics discusses in chapter one about how incentives can do the opposite of what the incentives are created for. Incentives are the basis of all human action and interaction [i.e. - people do not act randomly, they are always following some set of self-imposed rules and/or are trying to gain something for themselves]. As an example, the authors speak about a study of daycare centers in Haifa, Israel, in which parents who pick their children up late from the centers are fined with 3$ fine. After the fine is introduced, the number of late pick-ups immediately goes up. The researchers find that the $3 fine turns out to be a poor incentive for parents to pick their children up on time because the fine is too low. Furthermore, the fine takes away the parents moral liability and they do not feel guilty for late pick-up as they will pay for it. Further authors compare teachers and sumo wrestlers to explain what they mean and why. Teachers in USA, especially public school teachers, are being tempted to cheat to receive bonuses for their children to do better on standartized testing. If their students do not do well, they do not get the extra money plus they can even lose their job. This is where the incentive that was created is doing what is not intended to do and that was for teachers to cheat for their students. Also, The authors do not suggest a way that it truly can be prevented besides having a state representative to administer the test, but schools can help curb the thought of cheating by not allowing the teacher to administer the test to their own students. Now Sumo wrestlers are doing the same thing but instead of cheating on tests they are rigging matches. Instead of just getting in there and playing the sport they are helping the wrestlers that are in their group. Like teaching, the better you do in Sumo wrestling the better pay you get. And when one player in the same,…
In the first few pages I found myself so caught up with the character development that I quickly lost sight of the big picture. I mean how could I be expected to believe that any one person could accurately describe an entire management team with such accuracy. Richard Thompkins’ descriptions and predictions were almost humorous. His intuition into his co-workers was uncanny. From their personal relationships to the weaknesses in one fail swoop. I wanted to meet Richard myself. As the story developed I later appreciated the lack of filler material as the characters were introduced and it also made for a quick refresher when I was trying to predict who was going to be effected next by Brent’s plans.…