Preview

Free Speech Should Be Taught In Schools Pros And Cons

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
457 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Free Speech Should Be Taught In Schools Pros And Cons
A federal judge denied an injunction Monday aimed at blocking the implementation of Texas’ campus carry law, which permits people to carry concealed guns in public university buildings.

The effort was led by three University of Texas at Austin professors, who argued the law infringed on their right to free speech under the First Amendment, and violated both the Due Process and the Equal Protection Clauses of the 14th Amendment.

Judge Lee Yeakel rejected these arguments, saying the professors “failed to establish a substantial likelihood of ultimate success on the merits of their asserted claims.” Yeakel also added that neither the Texas Legislature nor the Board of Regents overstepped its power to determine where an individual is allowed
…show more content…
We will continue to support UT presidents as they work with faculty, staff and students to keep our campuses safe and to ensure academic freedom and free speech are protected.”

System Chancellor Bill McRaven has previously said the law could be costly and dangerous for universities.

Meanwhile, classes at UT-Austin begin today, and students will be met on campus with protesters carrying sex toys. Thousands have pledged on Facebook to be part of the all-day event called “Cocks Not Glocks,” with participants openly carrying their sex toys on campus. “The State of Texas has decided that it is not at all obnoxious to allow deadly concealed weapons in classrooms,” the protest’s website says. “However it does have strict rules about free sexual expression, to protect your innocence.” (Their emphasis, not mine)

To read more on the protest and Texas’ laws on obscenity, you can read Elizabeth Nolan Brown’s piece covering both

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    The issue with this case is that does it violate the Fourteenth Amendment. Which in short says that no other state has the…

    • 282 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    It was determined that the plaintiffs failed to show any part of the statute led to a denied admission to any non public school on racial or religious grounds. So the complaint of violating the 14th amendment was not discussed and dismissed for lack of standing.…

    • 462 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Fisher filed suit against the university and other related defendants, stating that the university of Texas’ use of race as a consideration in admission decisions was in violation of the equal protection of the fourteenth amendment.…

    • 92 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Are Texas’s interests in preventing breaches of peace and preserving the flag as a symbol of nationhood and national unity that were used to justify Johnson’s criminal conviction unrelated to the suppression of expression therefore allowing the application of O’Brien’s test? United States v. O’Brien, 391 U.S. 367…

    • 969 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bethel V Fraser

    • 663 Words
    • 3 Pages

    On April 26, 1983, Matthew Fraser gave a speech nominating another student for an elected position. The speech was given to about 600 fourteen year olds that chose to attend this assembly. The speech contained sexual innuendo. Before giving the speech Fraser received advise from several teachers that he should change the speech or not give one at all. But he refused to take their advice (2). The next day, he was called in to an administrative office and was suspended for three days and was told he would not be able to give his speech during graduation even though he was at the time the salutatorian. The family of Fraser filed a grievance with the Pierce County school board, but the officer upheld the suspension. In response, to that decision Matthew’s father filed a case against the school district. The District Court ruled that the student’s First Amendment right was infringed upon. The students was awarded a monetary judgment and allowed to give his graduation speech. Later, the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirmed the judgment of the District Court (4). Later, the US Supreme Court reversed the Court of Appeals in a 7-2 vote to reinstate the suspension, saying that the school district's policy did not violate the First Amendment (3).…

    • 663 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The reason why judges voted YES is because they say that Childrens are not necessarly guaranteed the full extent of the First Amendment. They add that the students did not shed their constitutional rights to freedom of speech or expression at the school.…

    • 499 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Assignment 201 Quiz

    • 3103 Words
    • 13 Pages

    Judges espousing a philosophy of original understanding maintain that school desegregation cases decided on the basis of the Fourteenth Amendment were wrongly decided…

    • 3103 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Case Study Assignment

    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages

    6. What effect did the United States Supreme Court’s decision have on the Texas statute?…

    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    School Board of Norfolk, 801 F.Supp. 1526 (E.D. Va. 1992). Here, a middle school student, Kimberly Broussard, wore a t-shirt that read “Drugs Suck”. Her parents sued on her behalf claiming that her shirt was a form of free speech protected by the First Amendment of the United States. Here, the courts ruled in favor of the school board, saying that although the shirt displayed an anti-drug message, the word “suck” was considered a vulgar word with a sexual connotation and therefore not allowed in school because it interfered with the classroom learning environment. Id. at…

    • 656 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Concealed carry

    • 519 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The code of conduct did not originally allow firearms onto the campus unless previously authorized.…

    • 519 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    McLeod, Ashton. "Bill to Allow Guns on Campus on Hold." Ocala Star - Banner: n/a. The Advocate (Stamford); Baltimore Sun; Greenwich Time; Hartford Courant; Morning Call; Newsday; Orlando Sentinel; ProQuest Newsstand; Sun Sentinel. Mar 06 2011. Web. 27 Apr. 2012 .…

    • 1091 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The first reason why guns should be allowed on college campuses is people have the right to self-defense. Practically all debates on gun control anywhere, have at some point come around to the Second Amendment of the U.S. Constitution which reads, “The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed (Bijlefeld 5). Experts believe that the right to arms can mean the right to self-defense and indeed, for many, the difference between life and death (Bijlefeld 74). Thirdly, concealed-carry prohibitions on university campuses only serve to exclude legal firearms carried by law-abiding adults who have no intention of committing a crime in the first place (Zalneraitis).…

    • 733 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Guns on Campus

    • 2630 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Cited: Coffman, Keith. "Colorado court says students can carry guns on campus." Reuters. Reuters News Agency, 5 Mar. 2012. Web. 5 Mar. 2012. .…

    • 2630 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Allowing concealed carry on college campuses should not only be allowed, but encouraged. Between 2001 and 2003 there were 10,472 cases of aggravated assaults on campuses across the US as presented by the U.S. Department of Education (Criminal). These large numbers could very well be prevented in the future if concealed carry is allowed on college campuses. Part of American citizens’ civil rights, as guaranteed by the US Constitution in the second amendment, is to keep and bear arms. The second amendment stating “As passed by the Congress: A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” This has been a long standing principle and all states have laws for concealed…

    • 658 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Gun Control

    • 1963 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Vertuno, J. (2011). Texas poised to pass bill allowing guns on campus. Retrieved from http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/02/20/texas-guns-campus-colleges_n_825718.html.…

    • 1963 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays