This essay will approach the three different models based on functionalism, Marxism and feminism theories. The information will show sociological understandings of how and why particular assumptions about the social world are connected. Functionalism or the building or structural framework theory sees that society is a complex system with parts working together to promote stability and solidarity. Karl Marx is the father of the social conflict theory, he talked about Capitalists. They are people who own and operate factories and other businesses in pursuit of profits, where the struggle between segments of society overvalued resources turning a small population into capitalists in the 19th century. Feminism analysis the status and differences of men and women in society, the theory is mainly about giving women a voice. Also highlighting there contribution towards society.
Functionalism; is the theory that all aspects of a society are related, and that function is to serve a purpose within social institutions. The function has interrelated parts- so every element must be operational and they are necessary for the survival of the social system. Each part contributes to a direct role, it has to adapt and stay in harmony and equilibrium in order for that society to function as a whole; Ground report.com (2009). Functionalism is traced back to Comte. A (1798-1857). BlogSpot (2011).Who is the founder to the approach to positivism; Comte a philosopher, argued that the physical world operates according to gravity and other laws of morality, and so does society. Sociologists argue these personal beliefs are bound to influence, and how the study of that data was interpreted. Mill`s. C (1959). Leading functionalists were; Durkheim E (1858-1917) and Parsons. T (1902-1979). These functionalists are associated with the development of the macro theory, which is an approach and analysis of disciplines to the rules and procedures of large scale society systems. A conflict perspective is the view that society proposes conflict to be a normal feature of social life by influencing the structure of leadership and the direction of social change. Page 1
The Functionalists see the family role as supposed to be contributing to the wellbeing of society. The social structures of the different relations in the families are. The nuclear family; It is a small family unit that consists of the husband, wife and their dependent children. The extended larger family; contains other members related by birth, marriage or adoption. Murdoch. P (1897-1985) in (1949) defined family as a social group with common residence, economic co-operation and reproduction, which includes two adults of different sexes who maintain a socially approved sexual relationship. He also derived that the nuclear family is `universal`, either by itself or as a base unit within the extended family. Although he argues that the family performs four basic functions, these are sexual, economic, reproductive and education. Murdoch believes, `no society has succeeded in finding an adequate substitute for the nuclear family`. His definition does not include single parents or other social places, like communes. And there is no consideration for domestic abuse or violence. However, Parsons argues that the family retains two `basic and irreducible` functions. They are the primary socialisation of children, so they learn the values and attitudes of society from an early age. Secondly, the stabilisation of adult personalities; the unstable personalities can threaten the balance and smooth running of society. Strengths and weaknesses; according to Parsons (1964) `The social order should result from general consensus`, meaning agreement in how people should behave. This value consensus is about right and wrong, and that it helps society integrate and run smoothly. Although the structural theory does not handle issues of diversity or oppression in any conventional way, the individuals will be ranked in accordance with these values and judged by them. It appears that functionalists have a strong belief in society, and they assume that society on balance is fair and ordered. Also happy families that perform essential functions both for their members and society are pictured as living in harmony; this does not cover the dysfunctional side as part of a whole. It does observe society as a complex system and is organized in terms of rules, and the stability of relationships is structured bought about by value consensus. It assumes the basic needs are met in order for a society to survive, although functionalists cannot explain social change very well. Page2. Martin
It appears they believe that society exists to fulfill requirements, when these are met there is no need for change. The radical and class conflict theory, comes from Marx. K (1818-1883) it differs from the functionalist based consensus theory. Marx sees society being based on power inequalities because of the existence of class order, and he points out that history progresses through changes and the relations of production. In an explanation of how society works, he argued that the development of capitalism would lead to poverty and crises. In the book: Kirby. M. ET AL (1997) .Marx had a writing companion called Engels F. (1820-1895). Engels a Marxist was also a political theorist and philosopher; he was one of the contributors to modern communism, which was based of the principal of communal ownership of the resources needed to produce goods and services. Together they predicted that capitalism would end with a revolution, between the proletariat rising up against the bourgeoisie and resulting in communism. Marx believed that society was segregated in terms of class.The key to understanding a society at any point in history was to focus on the modes of production these were primitive, slave, feudal and capitalist, where in the capitalist society. The capitalists are defined as exploitative by those who did not own and control the productive. Productive meaning everything needed in society to make the end product and produce the goods for society. There are two main groups which have conflicting issues with each other, the working and the ruling class. Therefore either you own the means of production and have the power, or you do not and have to work for those who do. Marx idea, describes this as economic determinism: Societies class system operated by those who hold power or means of production. Class can also control and shape everything else in their interests. The View on the family comes mostly from Engels (1972).He pointed out that the family is shaped by the economic structure in which it exists. By purchasing large amounts of consumer goods, the family supports and sustains the capitalist (and therefore inequality). He also suggests that the family as we know it was `invented` at the same time in history as private property and the state. Monogamy was created and seen to control women, and to establish legal lines of inheritance to private property.
Page 3 Martin
The idea of this being that fathers could establish who their children were, and to make sure the property or capitalist values were was passed down correctly. This social organization suggested that men could control women in the family and in society through conditioning. Zaretsky. E (1976), points out that the family serves an unequal society namely through the unpaid work of women. The family unit stay dependent on the male wage. It is not always possible for the family to sustain the pressure and shocks of frustration from work place. Althusser. L (1971), defined repression and ideology, one controls people through physically or with the threat of force. Ideology has a material existence and affects how people think in society. These exploited people who are powerless, are given to false consciousness. They are made to think society is better than it really is, but is really a subject of state control. Donzelot .J (1985).The author; policing of families argues that the family is not as `private` as it seems, and tries to enforce social control by informal or formal means; the regulation and monitoring by the state, doctors, teachers, the police and social workers. Durkheim refers to this form of control as regulation. The weaknesses are in the inequalities, and the tendency to be negative about the family in general. Marxists view their society based on economic infrastructure, with a superstructure on top. They see society as divided into social class, and the conflict between it. Marxist sociology is entirely focused on the benefits to the economy, and ignores benefits to individuals and society.
Marxist feminism sees the exploitation of women as essential to the success of capitalism. Feminists view their society as being designed in the order to meet the wishes and needs of men (patriarchy), and that family is seen as the vehicle for control of women. These societies are manufactured through institutions such as family and gender inequalities in the education system. Women`s position as wives and mothers to young, internalize the attitudes of male dominance. They want to empower people and campaign against patriarchy. Spark Summit (2012) There are many different types of feminism, radical feminism is seen as a patriarchal system of power that organizes society into the complex relationships ,based on the assertion of male dominance
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
Assess the contribution of Functionalist and New Right theories and research to our understanding of society today (33)…
- 1195 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Marxists and Feminists have criticised Murdock’s theory. They say that Functionalism ignores negative aspects of nuclear family, such as domestic violence, cheating, etc. Feminists see the family as being patriarchal and only benefits men and Marxists see the family as meeting the needs of capitalism and not the needs of the family members.…
- 605 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Marxist and Feminist sociologists have criticised Murdoch’s theory. They say that Functionalism ignores conflict and exploitation within society. Feminists see the family as being patriarchal and serving the needs of men and Marxists see the family as meeting the needs of capitalism and not the needs of the family members.…
- 676 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Functionalism- The functionalist perspective describes society like the human body, in the sense that society as a whole has social institutions to help it run smoothly these are education, family and the law. When one of the parts fails or shuts down the rest suffer and society is not running…
- 659 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
The Functionalist Perspective is a sociological perspective that emphasizes each part of society contributing to the survival of that society. In Sociology in Modules, they define the functionalists perspective as, “A sociological approach that emphasizes the way in which the parts of a society are structured to maintain its stability (Schaefer 15).” The functionalist perspective can be compared to the human body model. Each part of the body performs specific tasks. For example, our legs allow us to walk or run and our lungs allow us to breathe. Without each and every body part, one simply cannot perform to the maximum potential. Now when a functionalist is looking at a society, they may see different social groups that contribute to a larger population.…
- 1844 Words
- 8 Pages
Better Essays -
Functionalist views are based on that society is a system of interdependent parts held together by a shared culture or consensus. They believe that every part of society performs functions that help keep society running effectively. They use the example of a body to explain the way society runs as each part of our body has to work together in order for us to stay alive this is the same as society according to a functionalist.…
- 667 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Outline and evaluate Functionalist views of the role of the family in society. [33 marks]…
- 1558 Words
- 7 Pages
Good Essays -
Outline and evaluate Functionalist views of the role of the family in society. (33 marks)…
- 1022 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Outline and evaluate functionalist views of the role of the family in society. (33 Marks)…
- 690 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
In this essay I am going to be looking at two of the main sociological theories; Marxism and Functionalism. In the main body of the essay I will be looking into the history of these theories, when did they become popular and why were they so? I will then make a comparison of the two to see if they contrast, if they do, how so. I will begin by looking at Marxism and secondly Functionalism. I will then be comparing and contrasting the two.…
- 1470 Words
- 6 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Functionalism is seen as a macro-scale approach to society; it sees society as a whole rather than looking at parts of it. Due to this, functionalism sees society as a body (organic analogy), all the institutions work together to make society. This is particularly useful when observing society in order to understand the way in which it functions and the way in which all the institutions (organic analogy: organs within the body) work together to sustain society as a whole. Functionalism being a macro-scale approach is therefore seen as a strength as it allows functionalist sociologists to observe society, and its institutions, as a whole. Functionalism is also seen as a consensus theory, it sees society as fair and just, and it acknowledges that many societies, including the majority of western ones, have democracy and all individuals within a particular society share the same or similar norms and values. This could therefore be seen as a strength as it acknowledges that democracy does exist in many societies.…
- 1163 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
Functionalism: According to the functionalist perspective of sociology, each aspect of society is interdependent and contributes to society's stability and functioning as a whole. For example, the government provides education for the children of the family, which in turn pays taxes on which the state depends to keep itself running. The family is dependent upon the school to help children grow up to have good jobs so that they can raise and support their own families.…
- 3346 Words
- 9 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Functionalism (or structuralism) versus intentionalism is a historiographical debate about the origins of the Holocaust as well as most aspects of the Third Reich, such as foreign policy. The debate on the origins of the Holocaust centers on essentially two questions:…
- 1029 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Functionalism as a theorist perspective in which us as a human race introduced by the famous Talott Parsons, are obligated to fit into a society in which we all contribute positively to achieve certain goals, we must also want to follow the structure of society which will enrich us with rewards such as an income of wage, a higher status in society better accommodation and better quality food. With Functionalism in place we as humans are to perfume our role in society which will enable the structure to run smoothly and continue to work, to maintain this structure we must also want to fit into what they consider to be the normal role, Being healthy by looking after ourselves in all aspects of life like maintaining a healthy balanced diet, this enables us to function properly so we can work and continue to function within the community.…
- 1777 Words
- 8 Pages
Better Essays -
Functionalism is a theory about the nature of mental states. According to functionalism, mental states are identified by what they do rather than by what they are made of. This can be understood by thinking about artifacts like mousetraps and keys. In particular, the original motivation for functionalism comes from the helpful comparison of minds with computers. But that is only an analogy. The main arguments for functionalism depend on showing that it is superior to its primary competitors: identity theory and behaviorism. Contrasted with behaviorism, functionalism retains the traditional idea that mental states are internal states of thinking creatures. Contrasted with identity theory, functionalism introduces the idea that mental states…
- 185 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays