Objective 1: Understand the constitutional basis of civil liberties and the Supreme Court's role in defining them.…
INCLUDEPICTURE http//assets.apexlearning.com/shared/Images/logo-head.gif d 2.4.7Discuss Civil Liberties against National Security World War I Discussion INCLUDEPICTURE http//assets.apexlearning.com/shared/Images/spacer-black.gif d U.S. History Sem 2 (S2557540 eem Points possible 15 Date ____________ Before You Begin Answer the questions below to help you get ready for the discussion. 1. Why did the U.S. government pass the Sedition Act What were people worried about They passed the sedition act because to strengthen the Espionage act in 1917 which made it illegal to aid enemies of the us or to speak out against the war, country or the flag. 2. Come up with three reasons why anti-government speech was a threat.a. incite the public against the government and say peoples opinions. b. political fanatics tend to extremes when they disagree with somethingc. could harm the government officials or others such as riots. What groups were most often arrested under the Sedition Act Socialists, pacifists, and other anti-war activists Once you have completed brainstorming, enter the discussion. Imagine you have just heard about Schencks arrest. You want to write a letter to your newspaper to protest the Espionage Act. Of course, the post office may not agree to deliver your letter. And if it is printed, you risk being arrested yourself. Questions 1. What would you say in your letter I would say that it is not fair to the people that they cant say their opinions about what the government is doing. The first amendments gives us the right to speak for anything we want. If this keeps continuing, then they may as well as arrest all of us for not having a say. They had no right to arrest schenck. 2. Now imagine you are the editor of the paper that receives a letter like this. If you print it, you might be arrested, too. Your family and friends may have to answer questions by the police. What would you do I would print it anyway because I would agree with the…
The U.S Constitutional amendments place limits on what law enforcement and how a trial should be governed. These strict rights are to be followed because if an officer fails to abide by the proper procedure, the trial court may forcibly put an end to evidence obtained in violation of proper procedure or even release the arrested suspect. This is an amendment that deals with each of the following: criminal due process, arrest, interrogation, search and seizure, Miranda, punishment, the right to jury trials, and the right to counsel.…
Forty-five days after the September 11 terrorist attacks on the United States, Congress passed the US PATRIOT Act, also known as the “Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism” Act, or more simply, the Patriot Act. The Patriot Act was created with the noble intention of finding and prosecuting international terrorists operating on American soil; however, the unfortunate consequences of the Act have been drastic. Many of the Patriot Act’s provisions are in clear violation of the U.S. Constitution—a document drafted by wise men like Benjamin Franklin, James Madison, Alexander Hamilton, and George Washington in order to protect American rights and freedoms. The Patriot Act encroaches on sacred First Amendment rights, which protect free speech and expression, and Fourth Amendment rights, which protect citizens against “unwarranted search and seizure”.…
I feel that the First Amendment (freedoms of speech, press, religion, petition, and assembly) is the most important constitutional amendment in the Bill of Rights. This is because the first amendment serves as an enabler of the discussion of other ideas, including the other constitutional amendments themselves without fear of negative consequence(s) from the government; most of the amendments, at least in the Bill of Rights, have controversy surrounding them; for example, the Fifth Amendment allows the government to take property if the owner is paid “just compensation”, and it will be used for a public use, which is called eminent domain. However, in some cases, people feel that the proposed use of their property is not actually to the…
14th amendment clause that prohibits states from denying equal protection under the law, and has been used to combat discrimination…
Together these legislations formed the fundamental rights and freedom of an individual. These affect the rights of everyday life of an individual including what they can say and do, their beliefs, right not to be tortured and right to a fair trial. These rights have limits to ensure that it does not damage other people’s rights.…
The United States of America has become one of the strongest nations in the world. Through the unfortunate tragedies that have occurred over the years, we as American citizens have overcome these disastrous events together as one. Since the devastating attack on September 11, 2001 America has come to be more precautious, knowledgeable and prepared for what could come our way in the future. Having a new conspicuous perspective the patriot act was established, according to the Department of Justice's their “first priority is to prevent future terrorist attacks”. The USA Patriot Act stands for ‘Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism’. By passing this act it has allowed the government, the NSA as well as law enforcement agencies to lawfully obtain and monitor the privacy of innocent Americans throughout the nation.…
I think the most important law in Canada is The Charter of Rights and Freedoms. The Charter of Rights and Freedom is a protected law under the Constitution that outlines the rights and freedoms of Canadian citizens. I believe this law is extremely important because it is non-biased and has improved everyone's ability to participate in society as they wish. Also, The Charter brings clarity to the identity of our country such as multiculturalism; which Canada is formally recognized for, nationally. Before The Charter, there were many cases where there was an unjust situation because of bias opinions. However, after The Charter, different discussions were made on similar cases. For example, a court said that a pregnant woman who was denied unemployment…
Ratified December 15, 1791, the bill of rights was added to the U.S. Constitution as a way to ensure the protection of every individual’s rights. The bill itself is a list of rights which limits the power of the federal government and gives power back to the people in the form of rights and liberties. Some, but not all, of this rights include freedom of speech, religion and press, but perhaps the one right that still to this day…
Defending your constitutional rights, is what this country is about. Deeming an item of the United States Constitution unconstitutional may seem to many as an impossible task, however in this land of the free and home of the brave, we aim to make sure that whatever Constitutional stone the framers left unturned has been or will be adhered to and interpreted accordingly. Although a law may read the same on paper, the interpretation of that law may have different meanings (broad or narrow) depending on the particulars of the situation. Despite the misconceptions people may feel are incorporated into the U.S. Constitution or the framers’ intent, judicially the Supreme Court will always be the deciding entity; which is the dilemma in the case…
The source given discusses the prominence of the commonly debatable topic of individual rights and freedoms being neglected to fulfill the goals of the state. The source is clearly biased and against modern liberalism; in favor of a more collective society focusing more on the survival and prosperity of the state, rather than individual rights and freedoms. The source evidently identifies collectivism as well as authoritarianism as its most prominent ideological perspectives. If this source was a legitimate society in today’s world it would undoubtedly reject the natural rights of individuals as well as rule of law, egalitarianism along with the general will of the people. This can be most strongly supported by the following sentence stating, “The individual must serve the interests of a state.” The evidence taken from the source depicts a very strong presence of an authoritarian and nationalistic right-wing system of government and social organization. This type of a society most commonly resembles the life in the medieval period, where everything and anything was used to benefit the state before benefitting its people, due to the divine right of the kings, which left no room for individual worth. The source states “Individual rights and freedoms are less important that the survival and prosperity of the state”, this is an excellent example of the thinking of the early English philosopher Thomas Hobbes (1588-1679). Hobbes believed that people are motivated by selfishness and greed, to avoid disorder and turmoil; he thought people should give up their freedom to a government that will ensure order, which this government would be strong and able to suppress rebellion. The thinking of Thomas Hobbes and the source, both disagree with liberalism. Both Hobbes and the source given prefer the people of a society to peacefully hand in their rights, so that one single body of government can lead to the progressivism of the state through reform…
The Charter of Rights and Freedoms is a bill of rights granted constitutional status that was introduced in the Constitution Act of 1982 by Prime Minister Pierre Elliot Trudeau. The Constitution Act is also known as the repatriation of the Canadian Constitution. The Charter had several purposes; the first is “to outline and guarantee the political rights of Canadian citizens, as well as the civil rights of anyone who is residing on the territory of Canada” (The Canadian Charter. 1). Secondly, “It balances the rights of legislatures and courts through the ‘notwithstanding’ clause, which gives the federal and provincial parliaments limited powers to override court decisions “, while section 2 of the bill enshrines the freedom of the press, allowing the media to release controversial reports without fear of the state (Ibbitson. 2012). Thirdly, it criminalized discrimination in society, government rulings and the judicial system and provides a set of ethical principles for all Canadians to follow, while promoting equality throughout the country.…
If killing the boy is a moral outrange, the second objection is more to the point. It rejects the idea that the right thing to do is simply a matter of calculating consequences. It suggests that morality means something more- something to do with the proper way for humans to treat one another. I.E. Consequences are not all that we should care…
Fundamental liberties in Malaysia can best being referred to our own Federal Constitution (FC). It is fall into part II of the Federal Constitution. It basically refers to Malaysian liberties throughout their lives living in Malaysia. There are 9 articles regarding the fundamental in the Federal Constitution starting from articles 5 to 13. The United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights also recognised fundamental liberties as it stated that,all human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights. Everyone is endowed with reason and conscience and should act towards one another in a spirit of brotherhood.…