Preview

Future of Nuclear Energy- Thorium

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1038 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Future of Nuclear Energy- Thorium
Future of Nuclear Energy- Thorium According to the United Nations, we are expecting the world population to reach approximately nine billion in 2050. Because of this rapid increase in world population, humans have been looking for cheap, safe, and environmentally friendly energy sources to satisfy the population’s necessities. For the past few decades, the human population has been using coal, oil, and gas as our energy source, but we quickly found out that was not enough. One of the other popular energy sources is nuclear energy, as it is a non-carbon emitting and very efficient source of energy. However, catastrophic events such as the Chernobyl disaster in Ukraine, Three Mile Island Accident in Pennsylvania, and Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster in Japan, forced global leaders to re-evaluate the safety and future of uranium based nuclear energy. Is there an alternative nuclear reactor that is not only cheap but non-carbon emitting, and, most importantly, safe? Although many would argue there is no such thing, I believe nuclear reactors based on the radioactive element thorium promise the world a superior nuclear energy source, and a safe future for humanity.
One of the biggest advantages of thorium is that it cannot be used to produce nuclear weapons. While uranium could also be used to produce electricity, it is also used to produce nuclear weapons. While uranium is easily expandable, thorium, on the other hand, is extremely proliferation resistant. This huge feature will not only decrease poverty but also war. It will give global leaders the motivation to invest more wealth in their country, and seek resolutions with other countries through peace, not war. Having nuclear weapons may give a country more power, but in the long run, it will only create more hatred and potentially, more wars. Preventing wars will save countries from huge economic, social, and population losses in the future. If these countries invested more money into building thorium



Cited: Cooper, Nicolas, Daisuke Minakata, Miroslav Begovic, and John Crittenden. "Should We Consider Using Liquid Fluoride Thorium Reactors for Power Generation?" Environmental Science & Technology 45.15 (2011): 6237-238. Web. "Thorium." Thorium. World Nuclear Association, Sept. 2014. Web. 11 Oct. 2014. <http://www.world-nuclear.org/info/Current-and-Future-Generation/Thorium/>.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    between 1130 and 1170, The Song of Roland relates the latter part of Charlemagne 's conquest of Spain from a Christianized point of view reminicent of the Crusades. The author 's (or copyist 's, as some argue) name is given at the end of the epic as Turoldus, most likely a monk or member of the clergy, though no one knows for sure (Roland, pg 14).…

    • 2304 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of Collins’ main goals when teaching Romeo and Juliet, which he expresses early in the article, is for his students to gain confidence in their ability to read and interpret plays. He quickly realized that many of his college students shared the misconception that Shakespeare intended to idealize the lovers’ decision to take their lives for each other. To draw his students away from this idea, Collins tries to get them to consider Romeo’s extreme readiness for death. Juliet, like most people, views death as the only option remaining, whereas Romeo, throughout the play, continually proclaims that he will die for her. This shockingly different view of the play sparked interest among his students. He then asks his students to consider if the…

    • 380 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    labouring the Walmart way

    • 394 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Today nuclear power as an efficient and low consumption energy has been used widely, however, nuclear energy has potential and serious problems which people can not control.…

    • 394 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Recently the spotlight has been set on renewable energies to assist with weaning off of greenhouse gas emissions, solving issues with energy independence, and to exploit their inherent renewability. Unfortunately our technology is not quite up to speed economically with our wish to rely completely on renewable energy, thus many non-renewable energies are recognized as viable options to power our economy (Fraser, 2011). The United States’ current position on diversifying with non-renewables consists of oil, natural gas, coal, and the less spoken of, nuclear power. Nuclear power is the process by which a reactor contains a slow explosion called fission, which gives off a positive net amount of energy that can be harvested. Of course the social stigma around nuclear is so strong that even if there were an undiscovered completely safe type of nuclear power plant, justifying the complex science would be challenging. After events such as Fukushima, Chernobyl, and Three Mile Island, the vast majority of society believes nuclear energy is nothing more than a death wish. Contrary to popular belief, a safer alternative in nuclear energy has been discovered and has been gaining popularity over the past few years despite the recent tragedy in Japan (Sorensen, 2011). Though newly rekindled, the non-mainstream nuclear power known as Molten Salt Reactor (MSR) was discovered in the 1960’s and had been proved to be a very attractive option to the more popular Light Water Reactor (LWR). It all began with nuclear physicist Alvin Weinberg, who would graduate from the University of Chicago soon become research director at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL). Weinberg was given the freedom to experiment with designing multiple types of nuclear reactors including the prominent LWR’s that are in commercial use today. Subsequently Weinberg had noted the potential danger of a LWR and moved on to designing a safer…

    • 1325 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Humans have always tried to find innovative, powerful and valid energy sources in order to be able to supply the several needs of modern societies. In this sense, nuclear power is considered one of the most controversial technologies related to the new millennium.…

    • 310 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Sovacool, Benjamin K. “Nuclear Energy and Renewable Power: Which is the Best Climate Change Mitigation Option?” Proceedings of World Academy of Science: Engineering & Technology 39: 758-762. Academic Search Complete. Web. 2 Dec. 2009. <http://search.ebscohost.com/‌login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=40086266&site=ehost-live>.…

    • 2071 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Hansen, James, Ph.D. "4th Generation Nuclear Power." Ossfoundation.us. OSS Foundation, 18 Jan. 2009. Web. 02 Sept. 2013.…

    • 1380 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Thorium vs Oil

    • 374 Words
    • 1 Page

    Using oil to fuel the world has started to become a huge issue to us and the environment. Some people believe that switching the resource that we depend on could cause mass disruption and many lost jobs. This may or not be true, but not changing from oil could cause even more devastation on our planet. The Liquid-Fluoride Thorium Reactor (LFTR) could be a great replacement because it doesn’t produce greenhouse gas, its less dangerous than oil, and very little of it is wasted.…

    • 374 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Scientists have discovered countless energy sources, from fossil fuel combustion to nuclear fission and fusion, each of which have seemed to pose a different problem. Whether the problematic effect seems to be cost or carbon dioxide emission, renewable and nonrenewable resources have both seemed to come with a fair set of cons with their pros. Extensive research on the topic has shown that there seems to be no flawless source of energy extraction, however there certainly are sources that are relatively worse than others. This being said, nuclear energy, from the fusion and fission of radioactive elements, is one of the worst sources of energy because of its immense waste, danger to the general public, and large expenses.…

    • 738 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    With all these pros, there are still cons about nuclear energy. Nuclear power plants generate large amounts of highly radioactive material. This is from the leftovers, after splitting the uranium atom. You can argue that nuclear waste is a bad thing, but if it is taken care of properly it is not so bad. The highly radioactive rods are kept in cooling pools of water, which not only cools the rods down, but…

    • 688 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Roland Schenkel. “Nuclear Energy Acceptance and Potential Role to Meet Future Energy Demand. Which Technical/Scientific Achievements Are Needed?”. European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Institute for Transuranium Elements. (2012): 356-364.…

    • 3083 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    During the last century, nuclear power has been established as a reliable source of energy in the major industrialized countries. Nuclear power plants provide about 17 percent of the world's electricity. In the United States, nuclear power supplies about 15 percent of the electricity overall. Although no new plants are scheduled to be built in the United States, nuclear power is growing to be a popular producer of power. It has recently enjoyed a revival in attention and research due to the environmental concerns surrounding current conventional energy sources. Issues of regulation and safety are at the forefront of all discussions involving nuclear power. (Lillington) One of the major concerns is the radioactive waste that is produced during the fission of uranium.…

    • 2468 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout the world, countries are leaning towards nuclear energy due to the amount of energy it can produce with very little resources. This topic is worth investigating since energy is basically a must, now in the 21st century. It is now considered an essential to have energy in our lives to maintain our standards of living. We have gone to many different sources of energy other than nuclear energy such as coal, solar, wind, oil and more, but many of those energy source have flaws too. Some sources of energy will reach the peak of their production due to resources and will eventually fall, others pollute the environment just like nuclear energy and some just don’t produce enough energy for us to fully rely on them. Many countries needed a new source of energy since…

    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nuclear Power In Australia

    • 1421 Words
    • 6 Pages

    This report will therefore create an argument for or against the uses of nuclear energy.…

    • 1421 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Men and women brains think differently. Same is the case in shopping. Men and women have different shopping behaviors and patterns. If we see around we will realize that women are more eager to do shopping in contrast to men. You will find very few men who will say that they love shopping, but on the other hand, it’s hard to find out women who hate shopping. Hopefully men have some similarities with women shoppers but unfortunately they have and differences.…

    • 360 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays