Preview

Gaius

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1128 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Gaius
Analyse/evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of the reign of Gaius
After the death of Tiberius in AD 37, the Praetorian Prefect Macro commended the 25 year old Gaius to the Senate as the new Princeps. He was welcomed by the Senate as they saw in him a welcome relief from the elderly and pessimistic Tiberius. As the son of Germanicus, Gaius was enthusiastically welcomed by the soldiers and civilians as they took oaths of allegiance to him, giving him much prestige. Suetonius states that to the people ‘Gaius’ accession seemed like a dream come true’.
Gaius did not administer the empire in the same way, of which his great uncle’s Tiberius and Augustus did. Instead Gaius’ lack of experience led to his excessive use of power which eventually led to his rule becoming tyrannical. Although Gaius had his unique way of leading the empire he followed some of the actions of Augustus and Tiberius, this is shown through the way of which he eliminated those he saw as potential rivals or threats.
During the first six months of his reign Gaius was able to uphold a successful relationship with the Senate, promising to work in partnership with it. He became particularly popular with the senate when he abolished the law of maiestas, and recalled many of the senators who were exiled during Tiberius’ reign. Unfortunately six months into his reign, Gaius became ill and although he recovered his personality had faced a complete change. This impacted Gaius’ relationship with the Senate as Suetonius states that Gaius made some of the highest officials run for miles beside his chariot, dressed in their gowns. Gaius also began to isolate the senate and according to Alston he eventually completely abandoned Augustus’ concept of the Princeps and the Senate being a partnership, by considering the abolishment of the senate. Gaius removed many roles and privileges from the senate; this was shown in the way of which he returned to the Assemblies the right to conduct elections. Gaius’

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Roman government before Caesar was considered well established. Citizens voted for two consuls who oversaw Rome for a limited reign, the consuls where advised by the senate which was made up of retired magistrates. Caesar changed this all when he was named dictator for life giving him absolute power over all of Rome. Caesar had held office before his rise to head of Rome; he won several political offices, but Governor of Farther Spain won him his future. This position allowed his to ally himself with Crassus who was the richest man in Rome and who had gained fame by putting down a major slave revolt. The other man he allied himself with was Pompey. Pompey was a successful military leader and the three men used their armies and wealth to…

    • 189 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Augustus’ stepson Tiberius was well into middle age when he was confirmed as Rome’s princeps. He followed Augustus’ lead and repeatedly declined the recognition as head of state so he would not look too anxious for power. He finally accepted when he saw the Senate’s exasperation and he was confirmed as the head of state. Tiberius chose his nephew Germanicus as his heir instead of his son Drusus, but the death of Germanicus left him no choice but to make Drusus as the new heir. When Drusus died, Tiberius became despondent and left Rome for the island of Capri where he indulged in vice with other people.…

    • 246 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Tiberius Army Influence

    • 1116 Words
    • 5 Pages

    This is conveyed when Tiberius reduced his role when he retired to Capri – therefore determining that the princeps did not have to be based in Rome to rule-, assigning much of his power over to the Praetorian Guard Prefect Sejanus, who, Tacitus records Tiberius could speak “freely and unguardedly” with Sejanus regarding him as “the partner in my labours.” Ibid justifies what Tacitus is saying by “Tiberius believed him disinterested and listened trustingly to his advice, however disastrous”. Tiberius’ role is severely reduced during his time in Capri, as Sejanus was responsible for all communication between the Senate and the Princeps, much of which he intercepted as a means of corrupting the emperor so he could become Princeps, this is identified by Tacitus who suggests that “the ambitious Sejanus had his eyes on the Principate.” However Sejanus’ plans were discovered, the Praetorian Guard had grown more powerful in the absence of Tiberius from Rome, comprehends how influentially powerful the army has become in such a short amount of…

    • 1116 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Beware the Ides of March

    • 684 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Roman government was in ruin when Julius Caesar came to power in 49 BC. Rome was too large to control itself, and the only seat with effective power was the dictator. Caesar was the first emperor of Rome, and the Senate hated that he called himself king. The members of senate deemed him a tyrant, as seen in Plutarch: “Therefore the plots which had previously been formed separately, often by groups of two or three, were united in a general conspiracy, since even the populace no longer were pleased with present conditions, but both secretly and openly rebelled at his tyranny and cried out for defenders of their liberty.” (Plutarch LXXX) The Senate also wanted Caesar out of power because each of them wanted to become the dictator themselves, which would have resulted in further conflict and a bloodier war than the final Roman war.…

    • 684 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The emperor Gaius is a very misunderstood man, who is often brandished with the label of being ‘Mad’ both by ancient and modern scholars. However, it is my belief, it was the absolute power given to him, at such a young age, which caused him to have a mental breakdown. As emperor, he had no one but himself to stop him doing whatever his heart desires, which explains his increasingly cruel and erratic behaviour between AD 37 when Caligula fell ill and AD 41 when the Praetorian Guard took matters into their own hands and assassinated the 29-year-old emperor. The immense power that Gaius was given is bet described by Ferrill, “The powers it had taken Augustus a lifetime to accumulate, Caligula received in a single moment” .…

    • 2510 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Tiberius Gracchus had several motivations to reform. The first one was that the Tiberius’s energy and ambition on political because Tiberius wanted to recover public land for poor people, this assumption was based on some writing was posted on house-walls, porticoes, and monuments. The second motivation could be coming from Tiberius wanted to avenge his humiliation, since Tiberius rejected the 137 surrender terms, this behavior assumed that Tiberius wanted to against the senate on purpose in public; however, at the same time Tiberius was supported by the prominent senior senators as well, they provided huge power on Tiberius's reform. The third motivation could be that Tiberius wanted to safeguard the interests of the military. Since most Rome's…

    • 396 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Gaius was a Roman general. He is known for annihilating manipular military formations and restructuring the structure of the legions into separate cohorts. Marius saw the need to increase troops and the requirements for recruiting policies to be relaxed. He helped defeat the Germanic tribes, which gave him the title of “the third founder of Rome”. He was a significant part in Rome’s switch from a Republic to an Empire. He even helped legions become more loyal to their generals than to the state itself. Marius was elected seven times to the position of consul. However, on his seventh election he decided to invade Rome, but died seventeen days into his seventh consulship.…

    • 564 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Among these reforms, we have one where he restored the time limits for holding office positions like the consulship. He restored it to be like it was originally where a person could be consul for one year after being praetor. In addition, you could be consul more than once but at least 10 years had to pass from one consulship to the next. He set a new age requirement for being praetors and impose strictly the corsus honorum. I think his intentions with these changes were not only to restore the office positions as they were before but also to prevent any of these people from gaining as much power as he did and that could either overthrown him or equalize him. Furthermore, he enlarged the Senate with people that supported him with the end goal of keeping control over Rome and in some way over the Senate as…

    • 924 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As the new princeps, Caligula showed real signs of promise when he treated the senate with deference. What Grant calls a ‘cooperative and courteous’ approach, was an essential change that removed the senate from the state of servility that characterised their relationship with Tiberius. Supposedly at the advice of his grandmother Antonia, Gaius attempted to conciliate with the senatorial nobility, through the abolition of the delatores (informers) and maiestas trials that tainted the memory of Tiberius’ reign, as well as recalling senators whom had been exiled. Caligula also became increasingly popular with the Roman populace during the first months of his reign, holding games in honour of family members and to celebrate his accession. He held gladiatorial fights, boxing, plays, chariot races, and beast baiting, even adding an extra day to the Saturnalia (Festival of Saturn), ‘Juvenalis’. Caligula also paid a donativum of 500 Denarii to the Praetorian Guard who were fundamental to his accession, as well as giving generous bonus’ to many other groups and officials around Rome. Cassius Dio comments on Caligula’s…

    • 1392 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Appian once claimed “Tiberius lost his life because he followed up an excellent plan in too lawless a way”. Tiberius Gracchus proposed a plan which would redistribute land amongst Roman citizens. Though controversial, Tiberius’s plan was brilliant and well thought. However, the actions Tiberius took to have his plan made into a law were dishonorable and unruly.…

    • 923 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This loss of power brought about a series of civil wars fought among generals with the backing of their distinct armies. Julius Caesar eventually prevailed when in 49 BCE he rode into Italy with his army against the orders of the Senate. In 44 BCE he declared himself dictator for life, but was murdered by a crew of strict republicans on the Ides of March 44 BCE. This once again plunged Rome into civil war and while Caesar's heir, his grand-nephew Octavian, and Marc Antony initially joined sides to avenge his death, they soon turned against each other and Octavian eventually triumphed over Antony and his ally, Cleopatra. Octavian was given the honorific title 'Augustus' in 27 BCE and ruled Rome for the next 40 years. While he claimed to have restored the Republic, Augustus held many important administrative and religious positions simultaneously and so, in fact, became the first emperor. He attempted to maintain control over the Empire by improving road systems and augmenting town growth. He also united the Empire through his use of the arts as a form of self-promotion and to promote the themes of his administration, such as peace, allegiance to Rome, and respect for tradition. He visually improved the city by constructing new buildings that were worthy of the powerful Empire. He made art into the materialization of Roman government which was an idea continued by his descendants and was declared a god-- as had been his father, Julius Caesar-- at his death in 14…

    • 803 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This is because the actions of Tiberius Gracchus did seem revolutionary to many. For example when he disregarded the authority of the Senate by bringing his land-bill that states that no one is allowed to hold 500 iugera of land and that the children could occupy half the amount straight to the Popular Assembly without going through the Senate (Appian R. Hist. Ex. 9). His actions were based on his knowledge that there will be no fair hearing as most of the senators owned large properties and will be the ones with the biggest loss if the land bill was passed (Scullard 1982 : 26). Other than that, when Tiberius Gracchus passed the law on redistribution of land, the wealthy who are blinded by greed strongly opposed the law and accused Tiberius Gracchus of attempting revolution (Plutarch Gracc. Ex. 9). The event where Tiberius Gracchus decided to run as tribune for the second year without election made it further seem that he was suggesting dictatorship (Appian R. Hist. Ex. 15). Evidence of his political motives can also be seen after the death of King Attalus III of Pergamum. On the will of King Attalus III, it is stated that the Roman people were to inherit the throne of the King. Once again, without regard of the senate’s authority over financial and foreign affairs, Tiberius Gracchus immediately suggested a bill that this inheritance should be used to…

    • 1626 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Roman Government

    • 2157 Words
    • 9 Pages

    What Influence did Gaius Julius Caesar and Augustus have on the reforms of the government from a Republic to an Empire?…

    • 2157 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Here, Gaius references a study he conducted with his own patients titled “My Experience.” It describes the tests he took in his practice and refers the reader to his article in the San Francisco Chronicle summarizing his findings. Since Bolger identified statements about education, experience, and qualifications of persons providing services as product references, it could be argued that, like Nike, Gaius provided representations of fact regarding his own studies, therefore, he was in a position to verify his “factual” research. However, the test requires that the speaker act with the purpose of maintaining or promoting sales. Nike, 27 Cal. at 961. Unlike Nike, who acted for the purpose of maintaining its sales, Gaius primarily endorsed Prop…

    • 183 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    What were the goals of Radical Reconstruction and how did it lead to changes in ideas of American citizenship?…

    • 1242 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays

Related Topics