Preview

Galella v Onassis

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
823 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Galella v Onassis
Galella v. Onassis Case Brief

Summary of Galella v. Onassis
Citation: 487 F.2d 986 (2nd Cir. 1973)
Relevant Facts: Ronald Galella was a freelance photographer specializing in getting pictures of celebrities and other public figures. Jacqueline Kennedy Onassis, widow of former President John F. Kennedy, was one of Galella’s most frequent subjects for photographing. In the course of seeking opportunities to photograph Onassis and her two children, Mr. Galella had behaved on several occasions in a way that Mrs. Onassis objected to, including an instance where he jumped in front of her son’s moving bicycle, one in which he came perilously close to her in a boat while she was swimming, and several times appearing at her childrens’ school. As a result of the incident where Galella jumped in front of her son’s bicycle, Secret Service agents assigned to protect the Kennedy children had chased, subdued, and arrested Galella. Mr. Galella brought suit claiming he was wrongfully arrested and prosecuted, in addition to alleging that Mrs. Onassis and the Secret Service had interfered with his pursuit of trade. Mrs. Onassis counterclaiming for invasion of privacy, assault and battery, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and harassment. Mr. Galella was acquitted of the charges for which he was arrested, but his civil suit against the arresting agents and Mrs. Onassis was dismissed as the agents were acting within the scope of their official duties and thus entitled to immunity. Galella, already subject to a restraining order for his conduct, was further restricted when the Court issued an order enjoining him coming with close proximity to Onassis or her children and limiting his future attempts to photograph the family. Galella appealed.
Issues: Was the dismissal of Galella’s claims proper? Does the injunction violate Galella’s First Amendment rights as a newsman?
Holding: Yes, dismissal of the plaintiff’s claims below was proper and he failed to raise a claim of

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Holding: Speelman should have been granted a preliminary injunction, and her substansive and procedural due process was indeed…

    • 505 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Class Make up Case Brie1

    • 818 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Issues: Did Ms. Akre’s claims meet the whistle-blower statue? Was the “news distortion policy” adopted as rule by the FCC? Should a plaintiff be awarded attorney’s fees from the defendant in an appeals case?…

    • 818 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The plaintiff sued the defendants, claiming that she was sexually assaulted and beaten by hospital employees while she was hospitalized. The defendants were granted a dismissal of the case for non pros. The defendants claimed that the plaintiff failed to meet her requirement to file a certificate of merit within 60 days. As a result, the Court of Common Pleas,…

    • 688 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    John Cain met employee Oliver Dean Emigh (“Emigh”) and owner John Roberts at the Bargain Barn in March of 1998. John Cain (“Cain”) was a self-employed computer consultant. John Roberts (“Roberts”) explained to Cain that he needed documents typed for Republic of Texas (“ROT”) legal matters due to being a member of the ROT. Cain met with Johnie Wise and Roberts the next day at the Bargain Barn to discuss computer related topics. Cain became worried about Roberts, ROT affiliation when he went to work for Roberts on a daily basis. Cain told the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) about Roberts’ request for secretarial assistance on ROT matters on March 10, 1998. The FBI confirmed Cain’s story by the information that they received through their investigation. Cain said he would contact FBI Agent David Church (“Agent Church”) with any additional information that he gathered. Cain informed Agent Church that Robert’s was asking him to run checks for outstanding warrants against ROT members at which time he advised him that running warrant checks was illegal. Agent Church told Cain that he should inform Roberts that it was illegal. Cain attended a ROT meeting after Agent Church told him to attend the meeting if he wanted. Jack Abbott Grebe Jr. (“Grebe”) visited Cain on a regular basis to make photocopies. Wise started coming with Grebe on these visits to Cain’s residence. Cain contacted Agent Church on March 24, 1998 to discuss talks of obtaining information on explosives from the internet. Cain mentioned that he felt that Roberts was trying to recruit him as a ROT member during the meeting. Cain informed Agent Church on April 29, 1998 that Wise and Grebe asked him to find e-mail addresses of the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Drug Task Force (DEA), Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), FBI, White House, United States Attorney General, Texas Attorney General, and Texas…

    • 1325 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    OUTCOME: The court affirmed the judgment of the trial court, finding no abuse of discretion in the reduction of the duration of a covenant not to compete against appellee, former employee, where hardship to appellee by reinstatement of the expired injunction was a more onerous burden than was required to protect the business of appellant.…

    • 322 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Kevin Gardner was making a routine stop for cash along his route when he noticed a woman being harassed at gunpoint by another man. The company’s policy is to never leave your vehicle unattended at anytime. Mr. Gardner went to the aid of the woman, left his vehicle unattended to assist the woman, and was fired by Loomis Armored Inc for that reason. Mr. Gardner filed suit for wrongful termination in violation of public policy.…

    • 299 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The claim made by Plaintiff Sandra Primrose demanded procedural examination of her injury case against Wal-Mart stores and consequent compensation in regard to a concussion and the injuries she sustained upon consideration of her case by the court. However, Wal-Mart responded by claiming lack of material fact on the side of the plaintiff and requested the court to favor the procedure to their advantage by rendering summary judgment in accordance with Ricks v. City of Monroe, 44,811 (La.App. 2 Cir. 12/0/09), 26 So.3d 858, writ denied, 2010–0391 (La.5/28/10), 36 So.3d 247 and in their favor according to Ricks, supra; Freeman v. Teague, 37, 932 (La.App. 2 Cir. 12/10/03), 862 So.2d 371.…

    • 410 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The case was dismissed due to the state of New York not having a common-law claim for invasion of privacy. Also, the plaintiff’s claim for violation of civil rights law 50 and 51 was dismissed because the plaintiff’s name and likeness was not up for trade or being advertised. The claim for defamation was dismissed because the statement “flagrant opportunist” was the opinion of the defendant.…

    • 440 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Sheppard Case

    • 1274 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Justice Black’s opinion stands on the principle that justice cannot survive behind walls of silence. He states American distrust secret trails as held in a prior ruling of Oliver, 333 U.S. 257. Justice Black stand behind the role of the press and that its functionality is apart of the judicial process. The role of the press not is simply to publish information but to also guard against the miscarriage of justice by the officers of the courts.…

    • 1274 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kelo

    • 23643 Words
    • 95 Pages

    545 U.S. 469; 125 S. Ct. 2655; 162 L. Ed. 2d 439; 2005 U.S. LEXIS 5011; 60 ERC (BNA) 1769; 10 A.L.R. Fed. 2d 733; 35 ELR 20134; 18 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 437…

    • 23643 Words
    • 95 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Courtroom Oberservation

    • 612 Words
    • 3 Pages

    This court case took place in United States District Court in the Northern District of Indiana. This is court case number 82A04-8876-CB285, White vs. Patrick Gibbs and O’Malley’s Tavern. The lawyers in this case are Benjamin Walton, xxxxx Van Meter who represent the defendants Patrick Gibbs and O’Malley’s Tavern and Jackson Welch, Amanda Babot who represent the plaintiff Debbie White. The defendants Patrick Gibbs and O’Malley’s Tavern are seeking a summary judgment which is a procedural device used during civil litigation to promptly and expeditiously resolve a case without a trail. A judge grants summary judgment only if there are no disputes as to the material facts of the case and the party is entitle to judgment as a matter of law. (1) The defendants Patrick Gibbs and O’Malley’s Tavern claim there is no evidence to support that the bartender John Daniels saw any visual signs of intoxication from Edward Hart. This means the defendant isn’t subject to any legal wrong doing. The plaintiff Debbie White is requesting the court to deny the defendants request for summary judgment. The plaintiff claims there is evidence to show the bartender John Daniels saw visual signs that Edward Hart was intoxicated. The plaintiff claims that with the amount of alcohol Edward Hart had consumed in the time he was in the Tavern there would be noticeable visual signs that he was impaired. The plaintiff’s attorney claims there are four (4) factors of actual knowledge of intoxication which would point to visual signs of intoxication. Upon leaving O’Malley’s Tavern Edward Hart crashed his vehicle into the Plaintiffs vehicle causing harm to the Plaintiff and the death of her husband.…

    • 612 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Der Werf, M. V. (2006). Colleges should perform background checks on all new hires, conference…

    • 6674 Words
    • 27 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    May 29, 1981, The Court of Appeal of California, Fourth Appellate District, Division Two, affirmed a trial court judgment that the jury’s punitive damages award was reasonable.…

    • 1441 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Held (Court of Exchequer): The trial court found that the defendant was ignorant of the abandoned mine shaft and free of negligence and decided the case in favor of the defendant.…

    • 292 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mendoza vs CA Digest

    • 670 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Cecilio filed a motion to dismiss on the grounds of lack of jurisdiction and improper venue. This was denied.…

    • 670 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays