Hendricks/Johannes
H History/English 9- Period 5
30 October 2012
Gay Marriage Gay marriage has been legalized in six US states and the District of Columbia, as of May 10, 2012. Thirty-one states have constitutional amendments banning same-sex marriage (“Gay”). The gay rights movement is traced backed to the Stonewall Riots where gays and lesbians fought back against the police that invaded their gay bars (“Gay”). This controversy is whether or not gay marriage should be legal throughout the US. Eric Zorn’s newspaper article, “Change of Subject: The Top Six Arguments against Gay Marriage”, tells about six popular arguments against gay marriage, and explains how he believes each is not valid. Zorn wrote this article to persuade opponents of same sex marriage to agree that it should be legalized, and he informs about changes in our society and why he believes gay marriage should be one of these changes. Zorn is trying to tell how over time we have created and destroyed traditions and that gay marriage should be legal because it is harmless to society contrary to popular beliefs that it could lead to legalizing polygamy or that homosexuals have immoral behavior. The author’s bias is shown in this article to be pro same sex marriage because he believes it is not morally wrong because it does not harm anyone. Zorn also states in the introduction, “I 've been informally debating opponents of legalizing same-sex marriage for nearly 20 years…” (Zorn). The newspaper article “One Man Guides the Fight Against Gay Marriage”, written by Erik Eckholm, explains how Frank Schubert is working against the idea of legalizing gay marriage. This source is made to inform about what Frank Schubert thinks about gay marriage and how he and other organizations are trying to prevent it from becoming legal. Eckholm is trying to convey that this battle between gay rights leaders and Schubert, along with other same-sex marriage opponents, will carry on into the election on November 6, 2012 (Eckholm). The bias of this source is not clearly stated in the text, because it is an informative piece. Although, the bias of the main topic of the article is against gay marriage because Schubert states, “It is possible to respect the rights of gays and lesbians without redefining marriage” (Eckholm), which shows that he does not want to change the current marriage laws; however he still respects same-sex partnerships. Diane Stewart wrote this article for sharing her beliefs on same-sex marriage because she is running for US senator. The reason Stewart wrote this article is because she wanted to tell the public that she is pro-gay marriage and explain why she believe it is okay. Stewart says that, “I also think that our society should focus more on fostering healthy relationships and promoting commitment between two individuals”(Stewart), so she believes a healthy relationship is positive no matter heterosexual or homosexual. In this source, it tells the bias that Stewart is pro-gay marriage because she believes in change. Diane Stewart states that, “I am pro-same sex marriage…Religious organizations will not lose anything if same sexes are allowed to marry. And heterosexual couples will not lose anything if same sexes are allowed to marry.”(Stewart) This tells that gay marriage is not going to detriment society in any way and that Stewart wants it to be legalized. The controversy of same-sex marriage being legalized has many arguments for either side. Overall, two out of these three sources were biased for gay marriage and one was unbiased. So, these articles are biased more towards legalizing homosexual marriage. The articles say that love is love no matter what gender, and it does not harm anyone, which is why they are biased for gay marriage.
Works Cited
Eckholm, Erik. "One Man Guides the Fight Against Gay Marriage." Editorial. New York Times 9 Oct. 2012: n. pag. The New York Times. The New York Times, 10 Oct. 2012. Web. 29 Oct. 2012. <http://www.nytimes.com/2012/10/10/us/politics/frank-schubert-mastermind-in-the-fight-against-gay-marriage.html?pagewanted=all>.
"Gay Marriage ProCon.org." Gay Marriage ProCon.org. ProCon, 11 Oct. 2012. Web. 22 Oct. 2012. <http://gaymarriage.procon.org/>.
Stewart, Diane. "Pro-Same Sex Marriage." Campaignsitebuilder.com. N.p., n.d. Web. 29 Oct. 2012. <http://www.campaignsitebuilder.com/templates/displayfiles/tmpl210.asp?SiteID=3 508>.
Zorn, Eric. "Change of Subject: The Top Six Arguments against Gay Marriage (and Why They All Fail)." Editorial. Chicago Tribune n.d.: n. pag. Change of Subject: The Top Six Arguments against Gay Marriage (and Why They All Fail). 19 May 2012. Web. 22 Oct. 2012. <http://blogs.chicagotribune.com/news_columnists_ezorn/2012/05/the-top-six-arguments-against-gay-marriage-and-why-they-all-fail.html>
Cited: Eckholm, Erik. "One Man Guides the Fight Against Gay Marriage." Editorial. New York Times 9 Oct. 2012: n. pag. The New York Times. The New York Times, 10 Oct. 2012. Web. 29 Oct. 2012. <http://www.nytimes.com/2012/10/10/us/politics/frank-schubert-mastermind-in-the-fight-against-gay-marriage.html?pagewanted=all>. "Gay Marriage ProCon.org." Gay Marriage ProCon.org. ProCon, 11 Oct. 2012. Web. 22 Oct. 2012. <http://gaymarriage.procon.org/>. Stewart, Diane. "Pro-Same Sex Marriage." Campaignsitebuilder.com. N.p., n.d. Web. 29 Oct. 2012. <http://www.campaignsitebuilder.com/templates/displayfiles/tmpl210.asp?SiteID=3 508>. Zorn, Eric. "Change of Subject: The Top Six Arguments against Gay Marriage (and Why They All Fail)." Editorial. Chicago Tribune n.d.: n. pag. Change of Subject: The Top Six Arguments against Gay Marriage (and Why They All Fail). 19 May 2012. Web. 22 Oct. 2012. <http://blogs.chicagotribune.com/news_columnists_ezorn/2012/05/the-top-six-arguments-against-gay-marriage-and-why-they-all-fail.html>
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
In his essay "Against Gay Marriage," William Bennett, a great spokesman for conservatives and former Secretary of education under President Reagan, maintains his conservative stance that allowing same-sex couples to marry would have a harmful and lasting effect on our society 's intrinsic values and, in his view, would stretch the "fragile" institution of marriage beyond recognition (409). Bennett, as the title indicates, presents a powerful argument "Against Gay Marriage." He argues that allowing gay marriage would change the meaning of marriage, the ideal of marriage as being an "honorable estate," and would have a large role in molding sexuality (409).…
- 1615 Words
- 7 Pages
Better Essays -
Gay Marriages: Make Them Legal is an article written by Thomas B. Stoddard, an executive director of a gay rights organization called the Lambda Legal Defense and Education Fund. In the aforementioned article, he painfully illustrates the injustices and imbalance of the typical “traditional marriage” and its impact on average, devoted homosexual couples. More than just state his opinion on marriage between homosexuals, he emphasizes the injustice by accentuating real world situations. Not only does Stoddard denote the negative effects on loving gay couples, he illuminates the idea of gay marriage as something beneficial not only to gay partners, but society as a whole (722).…
- 396 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
The topic of same sex marriage is one that causes great debate in today’s society. There are many views on weather it should or should not be allowed and the effects it could have on the United States if it were allowed. The debate has been an ongoing one and as more states begin contemplating legalization the debates have become more heated. In an article written by Katha Pollitt, entitled What’s Wrong with Gay Marriage? , she argues for the legalization of same sex marriage making a multitude of valuable points. In an opposing article entitled Gay “Marriage”: Societal Suicide by Charles Colson her argues in opposition against same sex marriage using statistics and history to make his valid points. Both writers argue their points exceptionally but Pollitt’s essay is the better one as it is incredibly fair and reasonable and argues the opposition’s points perfectly.…
- 563 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Although the world has developed-and is still developing- controversial topics like gay marriage are still prominent is today’s society. William J. Bennett, an influential figure in America, strongly voiced out his standpoint on the topic of same-sex marriage through his article “Against Gay Marriage.” His concerns persistently argue that the rights for gay marriages are “pointless and even oxymoronic” (Bennett, 2011, p.409). One does not need to fully agree with his assertions to acknowledge the intensity and goodness of his mind. Although Bennett’s stance constructs serious opposition and serves as a valuable argument, committing numerous logical fallacies in his text weaken his argument and made his overall reasoning less credible.…
- 732 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
The marriage-rights movement headed by gay rights activists has been a relevant issue on the American socio-political docket since 1970 following the Stonewall riots in New York City, New York in June of 1969. The riots sparked an initiative for gay people to join the movement of other marginalized groups in a quest to counteract widespread alienation to obtain the equal treatment and recognition they deserved. Today those activists joined by a whole new generation of proud homosexuals are still fighting for the right to be able to walk down an isle and commit their minds, bodies, and souls to the one they love in front of the people they love and have it be more than an impotent symbol of affection; they want their union to be recognized both socially and legally as a different but equal lifestyle choice. They want to partake in marriage, not "marriage". The most familiar argument that we hear today in the war fought by traditionalists and activists is the argument for the purpose of marriage. Traditionalists like Rick Santorum would argue along the lines that the purpose for marriage is children. Most gay activist would argue that the purpose for marriage is finding love in a lifelong companion. In Gay Marriage: Why It Is Good For Gays, Good For Straights And Good For America, Jonathan Rauch, an openly gay male, explains how gay marriage would be a universal good. Marriage has evolved over the years “nearly beyond recognition”[1] from wealthy aristocratic polygamy used to impose socially structured dominance over women, to a business merger whose main goal was financial security for women and a pool of family ties, to an institution bent on maintaining social norms and gender specialization, to our present marriage where love, an unstable chemical reaction, is on the forefront of the reasons to marry.[2] He argues that the marriage portrait is not as distinctively black and white as some would…
- 2792 Words
- 12 Pages
Powerful Essays -
In the United States marriage laws are not supposed to discriminate, yet many people believe that marriages are clear religious and official vows, between a man and woman, which include the ultimate expression of love. The traditional belief does not claim a specific sexual orientation for homosexuals in this country who are Americans, and have the right to marry. This essay identifies specifically to the question; “Should homosexuals be able to marry.” Some people say “yes” and some say “no. Therefore, an evaluation of the marriage laws for the United State that allows homosexuals marriages, and the fact that the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and Constitution claim that homosexuals are equal, and have the same rights and limits as heterosexuals.…
- 2064 Words
- 9 Pages
Powerful Essays -
The excerpt written by Andrew Koppelman, “The Decline and Fall of the Case Against Same-Sex Marriage,” is a strong stand against those opposed to gay-marriage. Koppelman shows the powerful legal and moral case for gay equality, but argues that courts cannot and should not impose it. Koppelman argues that gay-marriage should be a right to all and believes that those that don’t believe gays have rights are “tongue tied.” Others argue that gay-marriage is wrong because it demeans the sanctity of the word marriage and makes a mockery of God’s creation of man and woman to procreate. Koppelman refutes this idea and many more in favor of the ban against gay-marriage by showing how others sexual preference should influence another’s household.…
- 481 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
One of the most controversial topics of today’s matter is whether gay marriage should be legalized or not. There are numerous reactions when this subject comes to discussion and can sometimes lead to a heated debate. Some individuals believe that homosexuality is unethical while people who agree with gay marriage believe to put in consideration that the sexual preference of another human being is necessary. With every conflict comes pros and cons and this topic is like pulling a tight-rope if ever brought up in a debate because you never know who will pull the rope tighter. Gay marriage has a vast influence on the society today, relevant to it becoming legalized, it is bound to impact future generations, and will affect the establishment of marriage later in life.…
- 697 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Both authors have some similar perspectives on the same sex marriage topic; one of them being sociological views and the matter of same-sex couples. In addition, both Evan and Andrew believe that family and friends who support and understand gay couples have a major positive on same sex marriage. Both authors discussed that many gay or lesbian children are being raised in a non-gay environment and that has a negative impact on the lives of children. The differences between Wolfson and Sullivan’s viewpoints are that Sullivan emphasizes the individual citizen, and Wolfson emphasize the importance of same-sex marriage. Some people are still ignoring the fact that our society is changing and evolving rapidly. Same-sex couples have been suppressing their voices throughout many decades, and now they are ready to fight for their freedom and the right to be married.…
- 1257 Words
- 6 Pages
Better Essays -
There are many controversies surrounding today's world, such as abortion, animal testing, and social reform issues. It seems that no one can come to a common agreement on the legitimacy of these topics. Personal characteristics, such as upbringing, culture, religion and ethnicity, all play a role in determining one's feelings on a given controversial issue. However, one of the most protested and discussed issues in current political debate is same-sex marriage. There is no right or wrong answer to this question, only hard pressed arguments expressing speculation regarding supposed outcomes, benefits and possible tribulations that would come along with the endorsement of gay marriage. Such ideas are shown in pieces of writing by Manuel A. Lopez, in "The Case Against Gay Marriage" and by Scott Bidstrup in " Gay Marriage: The Arguments and Motives." These issues both discuss and contend common controversy surrounding the gay marriage debate. After reading and analyzing each essay, it is observed that Manuel A. Lopez' style of writing and literary tone give him the upper hand in establishing a more effective piece.…
- 1492 Words
- 6 Pages
Better Essays -
Whether an individual is against gay marriage or for it, we all have an opinion on the issue. Andrew Sullivan’s describes how marriage as a basic need for individuals no matter their sexual orientation. However, William Bennett believes that “same- sex marriage would do significant, long term social damage” (1138). Whether we like it or not gay marriage influences marriage institution, culture, and their children.…
- 687 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Gay marriages have been one of the hottest and controversial topics in our society. There are still problems concerning this issue of homosexuality and gay marriages. Same sex marriages are legal in Hawaii, but in all other states couples must be of the opposite sex to form a marriage. Hawaii’s decision to legalize same sex marriages is considered a milestone victory for gays and may cause a ripple affect for similar action in other states. Those who support gay marriages justify their position by the concept of love. These supporters of gay marriages feel as though gay people are being deprived of their right to love. Many people believe that gay people deserve the right to love and to take that love and form a marriage. These people believe that gays want to feel justified, meaning that as a couple they should be able to define their own marriage for themselves and make their own set of rules. Supports of same-sex marriages feel as though homosexuals are being deprived of their God given right to get married. They believe that arguments against same sex marriages are unconstitutional, and they simply do not justify a ban on same sex marriages. It is not the idea of two people of the same sex getting married that frightens people so much, but it is the thought of change and the fact that the federal government will redefine marriage to allow same sex unions. When people picture the results of same sex marriages, they see images of unstable homes. Everyone would probably agree that homosexuality has changed our society, and legalizing same sex marriages is not likely to be an exception. It would be an injustice to discriminate against a person if he or she were…
- 305 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
The debate of gay marriage is very complex, due to the many different feelings people express on the topic. One opinion is that gay marriage should be legalized nationally. Others feel that gay marriage should not be legalized but civil unions should be granted to homosexuals so they have an alternative that allows gays and lesbians to receive something that compares to the same rights as marriage. On the other hand there is a large group that believes neither gay marriage nor civil unions should be offered to gay and lesbian couples and that any legal union should be available to heterosexual couples only. The different opinions that are expressed by society’s attitudes towards gay marriage continue to cause great controversy throughout the country, and should come to a halt by allowing homosexuals to wed.…
- 1165 Words
- 5 Pages
Better Essays -
In recent years gay marriage has become among the most debated topics. Many books, blog posts, editorials, and articles have been written by advocates of both sides of the argument. Andrew Sullivan, in his article “For Gay Marriage,” supports the idea of marriage for homosexuals. He believes that the idea of marriage is constantly evolving and will eventually grow to accommodate homosexuals. The counterpart of the article, “Against Gay Marriage” written by William J. Bennett, argues that gay marriage will be too drastic of a change for the fundamentals of marriage. The article continues to state that changes that have already occurred need to be undone because the basic ideas of marriage are being destroyed. Sullivan and Bennett both share the definition of marriage in their articles, but each illustrates his own interpretation of the definition.…
- 1590 Words
- 7 Pages
Better Essays -
Gay marriage has been the cause of intense debate in the United States for years. Sexual activity within the same gender was something that was considered normal in Greek and Roman times but in today’s society, there is a great amount of controversy concerning sexual activity between homosexuals and same-sex marriage. A couple of reasons why gay marriage has become so controversial is because of religion, the issue of procreation, and the concern for children who are raised in same sex house-holds. Although there are a great deal of people who find gay marriage to be considered a negative idea, there is also a significant amount of people who are for gay marriage and would like gay marriage to be legal in the United States. According to The Associated Press 3/27/13, a “Pew Research Center poll” that took place in March shows that the number of people in America who approve gay marriage are up to forty-nine percent and there is forty-four percent of people who do not approve (par.6). These percentages show that both sides of opinion come close in number and when there is a great amount of differences in opinion on one given subject, conflict will certainly arise.…
- 1599 Words
- 7 Pages
Good Essays