Preview

Gay Marriage Argumentative Analysis

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
687 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Gay Marriage Argumentative Analysis
Whether an individual is against gay marriage or for it, we all have an opinion on the issue. Andrew Sullivan’s describes how marriage as a basic need for individuals no matter their sexual orientation. However, William Bennett believes that “same- sex marriage would do significant, long term social damage” (1138). Whether we like it or not gay marriage influences marriage institution, culture, and their children. Gay marriage influences marriage institution. Andrew Sullivan and William Bennett believe that they both have an impact that can change the institution as a whole whether good or bad. Sullivan suggests that gay marriage will change the marriage institution for the better. Gay marriage can help prove that they have an equal right …show more content…
Sullivan argues that gay parents are no different than heterosexual parents or single parents. The child would still have a safe and loving environment, “there is no evidence that shows any deleterious impact on a child brought up by two homosexual parents” (Sullivan 1135). Gay parents have been around and there hasn't been an issue. Sullivan believes that once gay marriage is legalized, gay parents would help “reinforce a healthy trend” (1135). While Bennett opposes the idea of gay parents raising children. He believes it disrupts the balance, “it is far better far better for a child stop be raised by a mother and a father than by, say, two homosexual males” (Bennett 1140). He wants to keep the tradition alive. Who is to say who we can and cannot marry? The main issue is that homosexuals cannot explore the chance of marrying the one the love, while heterosexuals can marry freely. This action of not being allowed to being married is an act of being inferior than others, and dehumanizing. Sullivan and Bennett aren’t the only ones with beliefs on gay marriage; there will always be an opinion of gay marriage. Now that gay marriage is a possibility across America, people have become more open minded, time is changing. Who knows maybe gay marriage will be accepted as straight

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Sullivan would view “same-sex marriage” the same as he would view “gay marriage.” The two terms are interchangeable and are descriptive by identifying the marriage as a homosexual one. Any label before the word “marriage” would be considered a euphemism by Sullivan; he would prefer marriage to be a stand-alone statement without distinction, a statement that says to society, “I am capable of love, of community, of being part of a family, and I deserve to be united with the person I love in…

    • 656 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Citing a recent court ruling that allowed a gay individual to stay in his partner’s rent controlled apartment after his partner passed away, thus qualifying the individual as a member of the deceased partner’s family, Sullivan uses many sagacious points that most readers can relate to. His choice of words and examples make it seem that he is passionate about this issue and the preservation of the family unit in general. Sullivan makes a prudent argument as to what could be gained by encouraging loving, committed relationships. Legalizing gay marriage would promote social acceptance, the same economic advantages and relationship security between two people who love one another. This would also encourage a deeper commitment that is harder to get out of. Also pointed out is that legalizing gay marriage would not jeopardize the legitimacy of traditional, straight marriage. Allowing the same rights to fellow individuals could only help to promote that which we all hold dear, family…

    • 704 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    William J. Bennett, a great spokesman for American conservatives, has powerfully argued as the title indicates in his article "Against Gay Marriage." One does not have to agree with Bennett to appreciate the strength and goodness of his mind. Still, although he raises serious objections to same-sex marriage, his argument overall reads more like an outline, lacking specifics and expert opinions, referring to only one organized, careful study, and committing a number of logical fallacies which muddy and weaken his argument.…

    • 601 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In his essay "Against Gay Marriage," William Bennett, a great spokesman for conservatives and former Secretary of education under President Reagan, maintains his conservative stance that allowing same-sex couples to marry would have a harmful and lasting effect on our society 's intrinsic values and, in his view, would stretch the "fragile" institution of marriage beyond recognition (409). Bennett, as the title indicates, presents a powerful argument "Against Gay Marriage." He argues that allowing gay marriage would change the meaning of marriage, the ideal of marriage as being an "honorable estate," and would have a large role in molding sexuality (409).…

    • 1615 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In "Why the M Word Matters to Me" (Time Magazine, 02/08/04), Andrew Sullivan describes the troubles in his life that he encountered as a gay man. At first, he grew up in a traditional and conservative home. As he grew order, he realized something different between him and his peers did for girls. But no one explained it to him. Gradually, he became isolated and he felt that he would never be a part of his family. A few years later, he realized that he was gay, and his friends had found out that. However, when people talk about gay marriage, they miss the point. Andrew thinks people have gone into the wrong direction. He appeals gay people should not need to feel isolation. On the contrary, they should entitle equal right and get marriage.…

    • 345 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    In the article “For Gay Marriage” Andrew Sullivan argues that marriage should be available to any two citizens, which includes homosexuals. He defines marriage as “an emotion, financial, and psychological bond” between two individuals. Even thou most people define marriage between man and woman, he says it’s okay if the marriage couples are both man or woman as long as they have the “emotion, financial, and psychological bond”.…

    • 1442 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The topic of same sex marriage is one that causes great debate in today’s society. There are many views on weather it should or should not be allowed and the effects it could have on the United States if it were allowed. The debate has been an ongoing one and as more states begin contemplating legalization the debates have become more heated. In an article written by Katha Pollitt, entitled What’s Wrong with Gay Marriage? , she argues for the legalization of same sex marriage making a multitude of valuable points. In an opposing article entitled Gay “Marriage”: Societal Suicide by Charles Colson her argues in opposition against same sex marriage using statistics and history to make his valid points. Both writers argue their points exceptionally but Pollitt’s essay is the better one as it is incredibly fair and reasonable and argues the opposition’s points perfectly.…

    • 563 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Still another key assumption in Sullivan 's article is that having gay marriage legalized would give homosexuals greater hope about the future. He says, "It provides role models for young gay people, who after the exhilaration of coming out can easily lapse into short-term relationships and insecurity with no tangible goal in sight" (285). Here again, it would be helpful to have references to several authoritative studies or expert opinions, but these are singularly…

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the article ”For Gay Marriage,” author Andrew Sullivan argues for homosexuals to have equal rights as heterosexuals and that turning down these rights from them is taking away from their equality. Sullivan begins explaining his point on gay marriage by arguing with the definition of marriage. He explains that marriage simply just a strong, compelling bond between two individuals. He then continues the article by providing examples of…

    • 214 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Individuals against gay marriage insist the act is indecent, and permitting same-sex marriage will raise the separation rates. In addition, those against gay marriage imply that gays and lesbians are prone to spoil the long-standing practice marriage between a man and a woman. A further contention displayed by the defenders of gay marriage originates from the conviction that the real motivation behind marriage is reproduction. Gay marriage does not reinforce this conviction and should not wed, adopt or bring up kids.…

    • 340 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the most controversial topics of today’s matter is whether gay marriage should be legalized or not. There are numerous reactions when this subject comes to discussion and can sometimes lead to a heated debate. Some individuals believe that homosexuality is unethical while people who agree with gay marriage believe to put in consideration that the sexual preference of another human being is necessary. With every conflict comes pros and cons and this topic is like pulling a tight-rope if ever brought up in a debate because you never know who will pull the rope tighter. Gay marriage has a vast influence on the society today, relevant to it becoming legalized, it is bound to impact future generations, and will affect the establishment of marriage later in life.…

    • 697 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Gay marriages have been one of the hottest and controversial topics in our society. There are still problems concerning this issue of homosexuality and gay marriages. Same sex marriages are legal in Hawaii, but in all other states couples must be of the opposite sex to form a marriage. Hawaii’s decision to legalize same sex marriages is considered a milestone victory for gays and may cause a ripple affect for similar action in other states. Those who support gay marriages justify their position by the concept of love. These supporters of gay marriages feel as though gay people are being deprived of their right to love. Many people believe that gay people deserve the right to love and to take that love and form a marriage. These people believe that gays want to feel justified, meaning that as a couple they should be able to define their own marriage for themselves and make their own set of rules. Supports of same-sex marriages feel as though homosexuals are being deprived of their God given right to get married. They believe that arguments against same sex marriages are unconstitutional, and they simply do not justify a ban on same sex marriages. It is not the idea of two people of the same sex getting married that frightens people so much, but it is the thought of change and the fact that the federal government will redefine marriage to allow same sex unions. When people picture the results of same sex marriages, they see images of unstable homes. Everyone would probably agree that homosexuality has changed our society, and legalizing same sex marriages is not likely to be an exception. It would be an injustice to discriminate against a person if he or she were…

    • 305 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although the idea of a same-sex wedding hasn’t been legal long enough for statistics to be developed on children of same-sex marriages’ developmental upbringing, or that they are harmed by their environment, many people seem to think that they will be less healthy or normal if the couple that raises them are homosexual. People believe that the children will grow up to be gay, or different from any normally raised child, if they don’t grow up in a “normal” family. The results of studies testing these ideas are quite contrary to the popular belief of heterosexual couples. In fact, the studies show that children raised by gay couples seem to be more adjusted than the “normally” raised ones. The argument that children raised in homosexual households will grow up to be gay is completely illegitimate. In a study of over 300 children of homosexual parents, there have been no indications that there are any disturbances in the development of the child’s sexual identity, or the lifestyle that the child will live later in life. In reality, most children raised by heterosexuals are not raised…

    • 849 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are both advantages and disadvantages to the health effects of gay marriage on the couple themselves and their children. In favor of gay marriage, research shows that gay marriage has a positive effect on the health of the gay population. The legalization of gay marriage in Massachusetts proved to reduce health-care risks for homosexual males. According to the American Journal of Public Health, there were “reductions in several medical and mental health diagnoses that are associated with stress — including hypertension, depression, and adjustment disorders” (Kliff par. 4) They also found a 13% decrease in health related visits to the hospital. (Kliff par. 2).…

    • 962 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gay Marriage Rebuttal

    • 603 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The article I read was an interview of a reverend by a radio talk show host regarding gay marriage rights. In this interview there was much discussed but only one argument that clearly defined the reverends position on gay marriage. In reference to the topic of gay marriage the reverend, an opponent of gay marriage was asked why he did not feel that gays should be allowed to marry. The conversation is as follows.…

    • 603 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays