Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Gay marriage in the united states

Good Essays
991 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Gay marriage in the united states
Gay Marriage in the United States
By Teresenia Soto

2/14/2014
Mr.Cosma
JE Young

Will Rogers once said, “We will never have true civilization until we have learned to recognize the rights of others”. But, many will argue that this should not apply to all liberties of the American people; in fact they will differ with anyone who threatens their idea of right and immoral. For most, this argument begins with Gay Marriage.
As of 2014 there are now 17 states in union under same-sex marriage. These states consists of California, Connecticut, Iowa, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New Mexico, Delaware, Hawaii, Illinois, Minnesota, New Hampshire, New York, Rhode Island, Vermont, Maine, Maryland, and Washington. As for the opposed, there are 33 states that banned the legal bonding of same sex couples; of these 33 states, people claim that a great percentage of their votes are influenced by Republican views. Republicanviews.org reports that the Conservatives have “always held a stance of opposing same sex marriages because it believes that the sanctity and value of traditional American morals need to be upheld and marriages can only be held between a man and a woman.” But, recent runner for U.S President and Republican, Mitt Romney, supports same sex marriage in his governing state of Massachusetts. From the looks of it not all Republicans hold the same impressions; people can choose to be accepting regardless of their political views. But if that’s the case then, why is it so difficult for a non-politically employed, average American to do the same. As for Democrats, this liberal party stands “with the LGBT community in the fight to ensure that all Americans benefit from the civil rights that each of us deserves—because the fight for equality affects us all” (according to Democrats.org). Equality does affect us all, that is true. Everyday people risk their life defending what they think is right for themselves and others; put their lives on the line for the smallest ounce of equal opportunity. It’s been this way for decades. Generation after generation there is a new dispute. It’s always been this way and I doubt it will ever end. But if humanity, and at the least America itself, can come together and agree that something as simple as the right to bond two lovers no matter what their sex, then Americans will be giving a new meaning to The United States of America--It might, just feel a little more united.
Now days, there is a new kind of segregation amongst American citizens. There are the LGBT community supporters and there are those whom remain opposed. About 52% of Americans said they’d be pro vote for an amendment that would legalize same sex marriage in all 50 states. 54% of Americans in a survey said they think homosexual marriage should be recognized by the law the way they have done for heterosexuals. There is also a significant age gap. According to Washingtontimes.com, the 39% of Americans 55 years of age and older are more likely to vote against such amendments as opposed to the 69% of people between the ages of 18 and 34 that would. It seems that there is a frequent trend here; elders, stuck to a specific way of thinking, have become less accepting to today’s sexual diversity; as where “youngsters” and people of mid ages are more susceptible to acknowledging same sex love and legal bonding. “Gay rights are just a matter of time. Look at the polls. Worrying about gay marriage--let alone gay civil unions or gay employment rights, is a middle-age issue. Young people just can't see the problem. At worst, gays are going to win this one just by waiting until the opposition dies off,” says Gail Collins. Why? Why is it that society’s younger ages have no issue with the LGBT community? The answer: they were born into a time where it isn’t about what you look like, where you’re from, or even who you love. It’s just about surviving, it’s just about living.
Same sex marriage and gay rights are something new and yes, people don’t know how to act with “new”. It’s different, it’s scary and it can change things forever. But that doesn’t mean they can change for the worst, ultimately it can develop us to be better. 150 years ago, a black man could be executed for attempting to peruse relations with a white woman. That is less than 2 lifetimes ago. But today is considered racist and immoral to be against interracial couples. There are now multicultural families and mixed races. African Americans, Caucasians, Orientals, all work together side by side in companies, schools, neighborhoods. It is now the “norm” to have a mixed racial society. So who’s to say it will be any different with homosexual couples in the next generation, or the generation after that. Same sex couples are unavoidable, and same sex marriage is inevitable. It is going to happen, maybe not today, maybe not tomorrow; but it will happen.
“We are still not being treated equal”, says Nick Porto who was jumped and beaten for holding his significant others hand in Maddison Square Garden. “For a long time I was scared to be myself and now that everything has calmed down, I still have to move to a different place just to be able to show it”, said a homosexual couple to a DNAinfo Reporter. In countless situations people have drifted through miles of oceans, dropped everything and risked their families lives to make it to the country boarder, took dangerous life threatening journeys just to get into America where they knew they could be themselves; where they knew they would be treated the way a person should be, where everyone and everything has an equal chance to live the lives they want. If we take that away we are not just taking away human rights, we are taking away the American dream.

.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Snyder, Claire R. Gay Marriage and Democracy. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers Inc., 2006. 1-116. Print.…

    • 411 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    An archetypal approach to literature assumes that there is a collection of symbols, images, characters, and motifs that evokes basically the same response in all people. According to the psychologist Carl Jung, mankind possesses a "collective unconscious" that contains these archetypes and that is common to all of humanity. When an author uses the archetypal approach, he selects a universal theme through which to tell his story. F. Scott Fitzgerald’s “This Side of Paradise” uses the dynamics of the mother-son relationship throughout the novel to develop Amory Blaine’s character with all its foibles and weaknesses. Love is underlying universal theme.…

    • 648 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although the world has developed-and is still developing- controversial topics like gay marriage are still prominent is today’s society. William J. Bennett, an influential figure in America, strongly voiced out his standpoint on the topic of same-sex marriage through his article “Against Gay Marriage.” His concerns persistently argue that the rights for gay marriages are “pointless and even oxymoronic” (Bennett, 2011, p.409). One does not need to fully agree with his assertions to acknowledge the intensity and goodness of his mind. Although Bennett’s stance constructs serious opposition and serves as a valuable argument, committing numerous logical fallacies in his text weaken his argument and made his overall reasoning less credible.…

    • 732 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    post-arrest. This research could improve all practices by prolonging the life of cardiac arrest patients. As most of these patients die from the lack of oxygen to the brain, being able to preserve the brain tissue will lead to more desired outcomes and decrease the mortality rate associated.…

    • 1149 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    WGU GLT1

    • 878 Words
    • 3 Pages

    There is growing attention to the issue of marriage equality for gay people in this country. As of the writing of this paper, 16 of the 50 states in the United States of America have legalized gay marriage, either by legislation or by popular vote (Wisniewski, 2013). The discourse regarding the issue becomes quite contentious largely because of non-secular ideology that has demonized the concept of homosexuality for many years. As a sociological issue, the conflict has become a divisive force for many, from political powers as far down to the family level. The constitution guarantees equal rights for all in this country; freedom of religion, speech, etc. yet appears to stall when equal rights for the gay community are involved. There has been significantly more popular support for the cause recently, but the stigma and prejudice continue to linger. Is this a moral debate or has an outdated ideology become so embraced by many that the battle has only just begun?…

    • 878 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A very big topic that lingers on the hearts and minds of so many Americans today, on the desks of so many politicians and in so many courtrooms around the country today is gay marriage. There are two very identifiable sides to this debate and both sides have very defendable points of view, which are constantly being publically expressed by radicals and extremist from both sides of the spectrum. My point of views differ from those who believe that gay marriage should remain illegal however, I am going to look at both sides of this huge debate and argue the point that homosexuals should be granted the right to marry whomever they please because it is not only unconstitutional, but unjust and logically improper to forfeit to this group of people the same, equal rights to marriage as heterosexuals simply because of their sexual orientation.…

    • 1566 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness”. This is probably one of the most famous quotes involved in the Declaration of Independence. But what happens when our government starts deciding who is qualified for this rights and who isn’t? We are supposed to be one of the most advanced countries in the world, we fight for the rights of people around us, and somehow we cannot seem to find tolerance among ourselves. Why is being different so bad? Nowadays, we start to become a society that experiences a hard time accepting the different thoughts and ways of living of our fellow citizens. An example of this would be the struggles for the homosexuals across America to find an approval for same sex marriages. Although the Declaration of Independence says that every American has the right for the pursuit of happiness, for some reason neither the government nor the people in the US seem to understand that happiness can and should be different for every individual. As time goes by and news show up, I am more than convinced that same-sex marriages are not harmful for the society and therefore, should be approved right away.…

    • 852 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Gay marriages have been one of the hottest and controversial topics in our society. There are still problems concerning this issue of homosexuality and gay marriages. Same sex marriages are legal in Hawaii, but in all other states couples must be of the opposite sex to form a marriage. Hawaii’s decision to legalize same sex marriages is considered a milestone victory for gays and may cause a ripple affect for similar action in other states. Those who support gay marriages justify their position by the concept of love. These supporters of gay marriages feel as though gay people are being deprived of their right to love. Many people believe that gay people deserve the right to love and to take that love and form a marriage. These people believe that gays want to feel justified, meaning that as a couple they should be able to define their own marriage for themselves and make their own set of rules. Supports of same-sex marriages feel as though homosexuals are being deprived of their God given right to get married. They believe that arguments against same sex marriages are unconstitutional, and they simply do not justify a ban on same sex marriages. It is not the idea of two people of the same sex getting married that frightens people so much, but it is the thought of change and the fact that the federal government will redefine marriage to allow same sex unions. When people picture the results of same sex marriages, they see images of unstable homes. Everyone would probably agree that homosexuality has changed our society, and legalizing same sex marriages is not likely to be an exception. It would be an injustice to discriminate against a person if he or she were…

    • 305 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Federalism is supposed to be the safe-fail for the American government so that the American people are best represented and their best interests are upheld. The Constitution grants powers to both the state governments as well as the national government as the Founders could see the benefits for trying to stabilize a nation but not put the whole nation under the scrutiny of one power. With the powers being divided yet limitedly intertwined has caused quite a few national problems as of late with the largest one being on who gets to decide whether or not gays should be allowed to marry and be treated like a married couple.…

    • 662 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A man who lives in an oppressed world, who is this man who suffers and yet doesn’t know? This mans name is Montage, He lives in a city that is oppressed by the government. The good this is that he realizes that he is in a world of oppression. A world where life is meaningless, where they make sure you have less knowledge than the government, where they try to take the knowledge you have and weigh you down with what you know. If you have ever read books in this world they would put you in jail.…

    • 578 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    If the fetus you save is gay, will you still fight for its rights? (http://smartassproducts.hubpages.com) This is an ongoing ethical dilemma in our world today. With many states starting to recognize gay unions, and those who oppose it, the issues have raised many ethical questions like my opening statement.…

    • 1171 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gay Marriage and Conflict

    • 312 Words
    • 2 Pages

    On the outside looking in, it is rather apparent that there are two objectives in regards to gay marriage; those who say “green-light” and those who say “red-light”. In essence, when you consider the marriage battle between homosexuals and heterosexuals -- it’s like fire and ice; they both have the potential to overcome each other’s privileged power. “It’s this tug of war between whose gut feeling is better or morally correct that perpetuates the cycle of bitter feelings,” suggests David Myers , a spokesperson for gay rights (Myers & Scanzoni, 2005, p. 129). When we take into consideration the lenses model, you quickly notice that you have three parties – one that is for the institution of gay marriage, one that is against it, and one that is liaison between the both (the government). Those who say “green light” for gay marriage see themselves as being “ostracized by the other parties for wanting to belong” (Myers & Scanzoni, 2005, p. 13). Rather than being avoidant, this party finds it more promising to just promote “collaboration as they find an integrative solution that will satisfy both the other parties” (Hocker & Wilmot, 2007, p. 163). Meanwhile, those who say “red light” to gay marriage either see their counterparts (the “green lighters” and the government) as unmoral tradition breaking savages (Myers & Scanzoni, 2005, p. 113). They believe in that the perfect union in marriage as that of a heterosexual bases rather than a homosexual. The government on the other hand sees itself as the crowd pleaser. They are persuaded by the vote of the masses and see their part only as one who acts accordingly to the public interest.…

    • 312 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Critical Thinking

    • 1500 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In the United States, there is social unrest regarding the government’s denial of the right to marry for homosexuals. Plenty of conservatives are completely against gay marriage; and many of liberals are fighting for equal treatment. The neo-Christian politicians are using religious arguments to establish that homosexuality is an abomination. Clearly we as a nation are undecided on this issue. 36 states have passed legislation banning gay marriages, yet the state of Vermont passed a law that allows homosexual couples the right to participate in civil unions. Some other states are also debating whether or not to allow these couples to marry. Unfortunately, the dispute has left the United States homosexual community in an awkward position. Gays who gain the same benefits from marriage would be a more productive part of society for two reasons: the benefits from marriage and the pursuit of happiness obtained from the right of gay marriage. Many gays disagree with the argument that marriage is a tradition. They believe we should not discriminate who may be married. It is clear where gays stand. They do not want to settle for less than marriage status.…

    • 1500 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    If there is anything that gets me riled up and ready to debate, it’s the controversial topic of gay rights and those who appose them. In Charles Colson and Anne Morse’s essay opposing gay marriage, “Societal Suicide,” they express that marriage should be seen as a “traditional building block of human society.” It goes on to explain their tired and bias conclusion that marriage is a bond that should only be between a man and a woman. At the same time, they question the extinction of marriage because of same-sex couple’s oppressed desire to happily marry each other. How is making it legal for supporters of marriage and gay people in love to express their bond considered the end of marriage? Allowing gays to marry would not only promote marriage, but it would support the obvious right and humane decision to care for every citizen with liberty and justice for ALL! “Societal Suicide” explains that gay marriage is not only wrong, but goes against the natural order of the family system, as well as promotes “broken families” and crime amongst young people without mothers or fathers, all the while, weakening the meaning and status of heterosexual marriage. I do not believe in any reason for keeping people from being who they are if there is no harm being done to others. Gay marriage should absolutely be legalized because we all deserve equal rights regardless of skin color, religion, ethnicity, occupation, or sexuality.…

    • 1282 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The forms of marriage vary and always have varied historically and culturally. And now we are at the moment where we see other big change coming. Same sex marriage is that change that has already started happening in our society. There are a lot of perspectives on this issue and gay marriage is among one of the most controversial topics that the United States talks about.…

    • 962 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics