In this argument, many scientists propose that men and women were created to reproduce in order to continue the existence of the human race, linking gender identity to biology. Butler assumes that gender and sex are defined by language traditions and can be unraveled by her theory of performity and language disruption. Some scientists may argue that while Butler’s theory about how humans understand gender and sex is correct, it is illogical to assume that men and women were not biologically created to have sex together because of their physical designs. This reasoning might not reject Butler’s ideas about how language effects society’s view about masculinity or femininity, but it does challenge her theories, based on a possible “natural purpose” for men and women being created a certain way, thus establishing intentional sexual and gender
In this argument, many scientists propose that men and women were created to reproduce in order to continue the existence of the human race, linking gender identity to biology. Butler assumes that gender and sex are defined by language traditions and can be unraveled by her theory of performity and language disruption. Some scientists may argue that while Butler’s theory about how humans understand gender and sex is correct, it is illogical to assume that men and women were not biologically created to have sex together because of their physical designs. This reasoning might not reject Butler’s ideas about how language effects society’s view about masculinity or femininity, but it does challenge her theories, based on a possible “natural purpose” for men and women being created a certain way, thus establishing intentional sexual and gender