Preview

Gender Bending in Antony and Cleopatra

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1818 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Gender Bending in Antony and Cleopatra
Antony and Cleopatra is a fable about the destructive duality of Antony's character. Shakespeare uses gender bending as a device to portray Antony's transformation from Roman to Egyptian. This transformation causes constant conflict between Antony the Roman defined by empire and duty and Antony the Egyptian defined by folly and lust. This duality finally proves to be fatal. Antony and Cleopatra is one of Shakespeare’s Roman plays. It is a tragedy about Antony one of the triumvirates who rule the world who falls in love with, and has an affair with Cleopatra the seductive queen of Egypt. Throughout the whole of the play Antony is caught in a tug-of-war between Antony the lover and Antony the leader.

The two different worlds we are introduced to in this play are Rome and Egypt, each with different gender norms and values. Antony represents Rome, a place of law and order, duty and war, and he also represents Roman values such as honor, duty, valor bravery and self discipline. Antony forms part of the Triumvirate and it is expected of him to epitomize masculinity. His Roman nature requires him to disregard all that is sensual and emotional. In Rome, women are insignificant; Octavia is used as a mere business agreement to make amends between Octavius Ceaser and Antony. On the contrary Cleopatra embodies all that is Egypt, a place of decadence and abundance; she is sensual, sexual and exotic. As Rene’ Weis states in the introduction to the Penguin Antony and Cleopatra (2005: xxiv),”Egypt emasculates, and it does so quite literally in the case of Mardian the eunuch, a castrated attendant of Cleopatra;”

From the start of the play there is a direct contrast between the gendered roles of Antony and Cleopatra. Philo says to Demetrius, Antony has a “captains heart” and is a “pillar of the world” (Act 1, Scene 1, lines 6; 12) while Cleopatra is described as a “lustful gypsy” and “wrangling queen” (Act 1, Scene 1, lines 10; 48). However strong these perceptions may seem

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    It is very obvious when reading both passages that whilst Plutarch and Octavian had similar but also differing opinions about Mark Anthony and his relationship with Cleopatra, they are both guilty of putting their own negative spin on the situation. They both use different approaches to the subject but the end result is the same. Anthony is portrayed as a man who has lost his way and in doing so, has sunk to the lowest levels of society .The one thing they both agree on, is that Cleopatra had a very negative effect on Anthony and is responsible for his decline. To answer the above question we need to explore the relationship between Anthony and Cleopatra in more detail, to understand why Octavian and Plutarch had formed such negative opinions in the first place.…

    • 761 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tma01

    • 1151 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Elizabeth Taylor portrayed Cleopatra in the 1963 film, where compared to the 1917 film, she was more sexualised, yet more intellectual and political as women are seen as less dangerous when in power as women in the USA have had the ability to vote for 43 years. Whilst there is a more political Cleopatra, mimicking the currents affairs of the UN as says ‘one world… not one world, one nation.’ (Cleopatra, 1963 in ‘Cleopatra’, 2008; see transcript p.4). It still does not replicate the changes in the world in…

    • 1151 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Assessing a Queen Plutarch and Octavian both write damning accounts concerning the behavior and actions of Marc Antony and his lover Cleopatra. While Plutarch appears to take a more objective approach, Octavian sets out to condemn the former general and the Egyptian Queen. He declares that Cleopatra is everything a woman of nobility should not be and the soul reason Antony has gone so far astray. Octavian goes on to label Antony as “either irrational or insane” when referring to the mental state of the former roman general. He argues that for a roman man of such great esteem to have been lead so far astray only the worst type of woman could have infected his mind, leading to his scathing description of Cleopatra.…

    • 651 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    AA100 TMA01

    • 506 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Cleopatra is shown on film as an almost caring being and an intelligent woman. In the 1934 production, Cleopatra tells Antony as she kisses his hand “I am no longer Queen, I am a woman.” This suggests that in that particular moment, she is allowing her emotions to rule, perhaps even going as far to say that as a Queen she is quite a stony and hard character, but as an ordinary woman, she is allowing herself to love.…

    • 506 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    aa1oo

    • 1250 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Cleopatra’s “fresh delight and charm” initially seems to be a pleasant thing to say about the queen, but as the reader continues, it’s made clear that her charm was not appreciated when it disturbs “Antony’s hours of seriousness or mirth.” The Romans valued masculine…

    • 1250 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Part 1 Cleopatra

    • 505 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Both depict her as an intellectual manipulator who used the weaknesses of others to attempt to fulfil her ambitions. In the film when Cleopatra enters into Rome she displays an array of lavish performances conducted by ornately decorated subjects in a bid to win over the roman populous and senators. This is similar to Plutarch’s account of Marc Anthony and Cleopatra’s meeting at Tarsus. Plutarch vividly describes a barge decorated with gold and silver with purple sails, displaying Cleopatra as Venus (AA100 Book 1 Reputations, P. 9-10); he suggests she does this to draw the attention to her through a display of power and wealth. In the same scene a roman also says “in obtaining her objectives she employs torture, poison and even her own sexual talents” the second roman statement resembles Plutarch’s view of Cleopatra heavily. Plutarch indicates that Cleopatra is cleaver and has an aptitude for manipulation and cunning; he says “she was a master of a thousand flatteries “(AA100 Book 1 Reputations, P11) both versions of Cleopatra represent her as an intellectual and a manipulator.…

    • 505 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Shakespeare’s tragedy Julius Caesar clearly presents conflicting perspectives of the assassination of Caesar, a powerful and respected leader, viewed by the conspirators as overly ambitious, but by Marc Antony as a loyal servant of Rome. Brutus and the conspirators believe that Caesar’s death is necessary in retaining democracy, whereas Antony regards the act as brutal murder.…

    • 1236 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Julius Caesar Flaws

    • 2477 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Written by Shakespeare more than one thousand five hundred years after Julius Caesar’s death, Julius Caesar, Shakespeare’s well-known tragedy, is unique in that it contains two tragic characters, the senator Brutus and emperor Caesar. A play in five acts, Julius Caesar attempts to portray the assassination of Caesar, at that time victorious over Pompey’s sons, and the civil war that follows, culminating in the establishment of the Second Triumvirate. Although Caesar meets his end comparatively early in the third act, both Brutus and Caesar are adequately portrayed as men of high repute who, through flawed actions and decisions, meet an untimely end. In short, both are tragic heroes.…

    • 2477 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Images and interpretations of a person can change over time. Such movement is paralleled with changes in opinion and morals throughout generations. Cleopatra the seventh is subject to this fluctuation. Ancient images and interpretations differ greatly to the impression left today merely by her name. Chris Dumasis, a modern day historian amplifies this theory in ‘Interpretations of Cleopatra’. She argues, “women have been demeaned of their true substance since the early time of patriarchal society.” Taken into account, this argument entails that when studying ancient sources it must be understood that at times, only a very narrow view of the events are presented in history. Cleopatra is a victim of this view. Roman and Latin interpretations are extremely one sided and are the few ancient sources of her that remain today. But they do not count for the entire story, as they were only two of the few literate societies at the time. As a result, the true image of Cleopatra may have been suffocated for centuries, only capably of being fully appreciated by modern day images and interpretations of her.…

    • 1325 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Julius Caesar

    • 506 Words
    • 3 Pages

    •Antony is looked upon as an irresponsible kid who likes to attend plays and go out at night. He was Caesar's loyal assistant. That Antony loved Caesar there is no doubt. There is, however, ample evidence that Antony was the "sleek-headed man" of whom Caesar warns in Act I. His oration at Caesar's funeral was more than an attempt to avenge Caesar's death. It was a power grab. Antony speaks of Caesar's will. During the civil war that follows, he changes the will. Antony ruthlessly orders the murder of hundreds of citizens.…

    • 506 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the play Julius Caesar, two women are portrayed as wives to Brutus and Caesar. They are helpful in some ways, destructive and even to blame in other ways. During this play they react differently than most women would. Although most people say that women are strong willed, independent, and relentless at times the women in the play Julius Caesar by Shakespeare, Calpurnia and Portia, are weak and rely on others for their own needs.…

    • 233 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Using in his plays a wide variety of what one might call today gender- based stereotypes, Shakespeare gives us a good insight into what the male-female interactions looked like at the time. The question that arises is the following : to what extent did Shakespeare want to convey his own ideas on gender through his plays ? By exploring a few Shakespeare 's plays, we are first of all going to focus on the difference of treatment between men and women in tragedies and in comedies, which will bring us to deal with the cross-gender costumes. Eventually, we will see…

    • 1826 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Women play a minor role in the overall plot of The Tragedy of Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare but without them, two of the main characters: Brutus and Caesar would be incomplete and certain language could not be used. Shakespeare uses the two women: Portia and Calphurnia to show the audience the other side(s) of Brutus and Caesars characters and as R. Moore says in his article Women in Julius Caesar "They also provide elements of love and loyalty in a play that is largely concerned with death and intrigue."(1)…

    • 945 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the play Julius Caesar, gender roles play a predominant part in the lives of all characters. The women and men in the play are treated differently in various ways. Calpurnia and Portia are two women who share many of similarities in their marriages, but also possess differences in how each one of their husbands treats the relationship. Throughout the play, the women are overpowered by their husbands, while the wives have no “voice” and significance in their respective relationship.…

    • 631 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Enobarbus2

    • 1235 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Despite being a character, who, in terms of plot development, is less significant than the protagonists from the ruling classes, Domitius Enobarbus is nevertheless a crucial character in understanding William Shakespeare’s, ‘Antony and Cleopatra’. Whilst the majority of Shakespeare’s characters within this play are based heavily on their descriptions as they appear in Plutarch’s, ‘Lives’ Enobarbus is contrastingly a character who is almost entirely formed from Shakespeare’s own imagination, this being testimony to Enobarbus’ dramatic necessity. He is valued not only as a subordinate officer to Mark Antony but equally as a close friend giving him a unique social as well as locational mobility, since being a soldier he is not bound to a particular place by responsibility in the same way as Antony, Cleopatra or Caesar. As a result Enobarbus is close to omnipresent during the play and Shakespeare uses this by making Enobarbus the play’s rather comical commentator. Perhaps one of the most neutral characters in the play (favouring neither Rome nor Egypt) Enobarbus voices: the truth and cynical perspectives when they don’t want to be heard; his own prophecies; and an equal critique of both Roman and Egyptian values leading him to be seen, as G. Wilson Knight describes it as, ‘the spokesman of enlightened common sense’. Although his suicidal fate may appear to counter this description, is it really a sufficient reason for us to doubt Enobarbus’ wisdom.…

    • 1235 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays