Preview

Enobarbus2

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1235 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Enobarbus2
‘Enobarbus, the voice of common sense’ By considering Shakespeare’s dramatic presentation of Enobarbus evaluate this view
Despite being a character, who, in terms of plot development, is less significant than the protagonists from the ruling classes, Domitius Enobarbus is nevertheless a crucial character in understanding William Shakespeare’s, ‘Antony and Cleopatra’. Whilst the majority of Shakespeare’s characters within this play are based heavily on their descriptions as they appear in Plutarch’s, ‘Lives’ Enobarbus is contrastingly a character who is almost entirely formed from Shakespeare’s own imagination, this being testimony to Enobarbus’ dramatic necessity. He is valued not only as a subordinate officer to Mark Antony but equally as a close friend giving him a unique social as well as locational mobility, since being a soldier he is not bound to a particular place by responsibility in the same way as Antony, Cleopatra or Caesar. As a result Enobarbus is close to omnipresent during the play and Shakespeare uses this by making Enobarbus the play’s rather comical commentator. Perhaps one of the most neutral characters in the play (favouring neither Rome nor Egypt) Enobarbus voices: the truth and cynical perspectives when they don’t want to be heard; his own prophecies; and an equal critique of both Roman and Egyptian values leading him to be seen, as G. Wilson Knight describes it as, ‘the spokesman of enlightened common sense’. Although his suicidal fate may appear to counter this description, is it really a sufficient reason for us to doubt Enobarbus’ wisdom.
Enobarbus often takes it upon himself to vehicle of truth offering reasonable prophecies concerning the character’s fates. For example, when the triumvirate have entered into negotiations on Antony’s return to Rome Enobarbus is quick to remark, ‘if you borrow one another’s love for the instant, you may, when you hear no more words of Pompey, return it again’. Here, he exposes the superficiality of the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In many ways the character of Enobarbus is the most accurate and reliable source for the audience to reveal the most about Antony’s tragic decline, and so therefore he is the most credible. This is perhaps most prominent when Enobarbus is talking with Agrippa and Maecenas in Act 2 Scene 3 and when Maecenas’ character tells him that “Now Antony must leave [Octavia] utterly”, the reply is “Never! He will not.” This shows the audience that Enobarbus’ character knows the most about Antony, as he is the only character who knows that Antony will never leave Cleopatra, and so he is the only character that is able to show the audience the scale of the tragic decline that Antony will experience. The fact that the phrase has masculine stresses on the “Never!” and “not” would have shown a Jacobean audience how assertive Enobarbus’ character was on this point and how sure he is that Antony will leave Octavia for Cleopatra, which fore-shadows Antony’s tragic decline as a Jacobean audience would have known the story of Antony and Cleopatra, and so hearing his character say this would have made him a very credible source that reveals the most about Antony’s tragic decline. Also, as the stresses are masculine, it would have portrayed Enobarbus’ character as a very strong and assertive male figure at this point in the play, which would have meant that a Jacobean audience would have seen the information he gives to them more reliable as the men were the dominant figures who were always correct, again making him more credible to reveal the most information about Antony’s tragic decline.…

    • 872 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In William Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar and Lorraine Hansberry’s A Raisin in the Sun themes, symbols, and characters can be compared. Both A Raisin in the Sun and Julius Caesar were written for the stage; therefore their characters become more obvious and more thoroughly portrayed than in a book, for example. Even though, these works were written by far different authors and in different centuries their similarities and differences are evident. In both A Raisin in the Sun and Julius Caesar themes, symbols, and character development are consistent.…

    • 2289 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    After carefully examining your OPVL on the excerpt, “Gender, Work, and Wage in Colonial New England”, I could find no faults in how it was written. Your origin statement covers all necessary bases (author, primary v. secondary, date of creation) and even ventures further by including a small description of what the source covers. You then transition into extending your source description in your purpose statement. While reading, I became drawn in by what you had stated in your purpose statement, the idea that women at the time had done the opposite of what historians would have expected. Your value was extremely analytical and detailed, as you were able to point out all in which the source had to offer. Lastly, your limitation in itself would…

    • 191 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the play Ajax, one of the main themes is justice. In it two conflicting ideas of justice are stated: first, that it is self-proclaiming, and second, that it is situational and must be worked out. These opposing ideas are very clearly shown in the dialogue between Teucer and Menelaus, where they argue over whether Ajax should be given a proper funeral and the conflicting definitions are exposed. In this essay, I will analyze how this piece of dialogue demonstrates both definitions of justice, without answering which is correct.…

    • 494 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Power is a theme that has dominated mankind since history was recorded. The assassination of Julius Caesar, ruler of the greatest empire the world has ever known, was a result of such a struggle for power. The foundations of Shakespeare's 'Julius Caesar' are power relationships which dominate the liaisons between characters of opposing sex, classes, and ambitions. Even in the historical context, Rome in 44 BC, the height of the Roman Republic, predisposes the play to a complex tangle of power conflicts. As the power of prominent characters builds tension, ambitions develops, and thus manipulation arises. Struggles of authority and dominance are evident between the characters in 'Julius Caesar', through Shakespeare's…

    • 1643 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Antony uses figurative language when he says, “My heart is in the coffin there was Caesar, And I must pause till it come back to me (pg. 123).” Antony uses this metaphor to portray to the citizens of Rome, the sadness and mourning that has impacted him personally due to the murder of Caesar. And because the Romans see and feel Antony’s sadness it will rub off on them and truly make them question the actions of Brutus and the conspirators. The use of this metaphor at the end of Antony’s speech illuminates the conflict between the Romans and Brutus.…

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Without any power, a society tends to become irrational, indecisive and flavorless. This ideal is portrayed in all scenes including plebeians, whether through direct or indirect characterization. The premiering scene portrayed Marullus and Flavius along the streets, scolding commoners for being hypocrites. “You blocks, you stones, you worse than senseless things!/O you hard hearts, you cruel men of Rome,/Knew you not Pompey?” (1.1.27-29) was proclaimed by Marullus, in protest of Caesars’ celebrations. This reveals that the common people of Rome are easily swayed, as they cheered for Caesar defeating his predecessor, after recently cheering for Pompey himself. An exquisite example of the citizens’ complacency comes from the Third Plebeian. He states,“The noble Brutus is ascended: silence” (3.2.14) but yet, after a short speech from Antony regarding the conspirators, he claims, “There’s not a nobler man in Rome than Antony”( 3.2.96). Furthermore, when attending to Caesar,“We are bless’d that Rome is rid of him”(3.2.48) stated the citizens, only to later say, “They were villains, murderers” (3.2.135) merely for doing the very “ridding” they praised! Complicity and irrationality are portrayed by the violent outburst, “Revenge!—About!—Seek!—Burn!/Fire!—Kill!—Slay! Let not a traitor live” (3.2.183-184) from the citizens, once Antony’s speech is…

    • 539 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Shakespeare’s The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, Mark Antony proves himself to be the most effective manipulator. This feat was the product of many factors that Antony both took into account, and employed to a greater effect than his counterparts. Using the illustrative Rhetorical Triangle of Aristotle, Antony was able to convey the three main ingredients of good rhetoric to convince the Roman mob to turn upon the conspirators, mere moments after being told by Brutus that they had acted with “honor”. Using Logos, Antony’s logical argument that Caesar was not ambitious made the mob begin to doubt their current suppositions that Caesar deserved death for his ambition. With the emotive appeals of…

    • 1796 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As Cicero states: “men may construe things after their fashion”, in the midst of subjective conflicting perspectives upon a certain personality, what would you draw from it? William Shakespeare lends this thought to the audiences of his time as well as ours through the play, Julius Caesar. Was Julius Caesar really the noblest man that ever lived, an ambitious tyrant, or both? Enhanced by the personal values of Cassius and Brutus, we can discover that studying the conflicting perspectives of Caesar and his power can bring us closer to the truth of his character whilst cultivating a more diverse and provocative insight to Shakespeare’s context and audience.…

    • 787 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Shakespeare presents the internal conflict that occurs in Brutus when he contemplates the assassination. He tries to rationalise his decisions through the balance of the language, weighing the arguments of the situation. “Th’ abuse of greatness...disjoins remorse from…

    • 1236 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The exposition of Julius Caesar, Shakespeare immediately presents the ideals that underpin the differing views of Caesar’s rising power through his two protagonists, Brutus and Cassius. Both characters posses different interpretations on Caesar’s reign on Rome, one being loyal to Rome and a love and respect for Caesar “I love him well” but the other being a spiteful and vitriolic towards a “feeble old tyrant.” This highlights the notion of Cassius’s selfish prejudice towards his own contentment, which is only shown behind closed doors. Brutus on the other hand is victim to Cassius’ vitriol and becomes the pawn as he is manipulated “poor Brutus, with himself at war,” Brutus is troubled emotionally, torn by his patriotism and his respect for Caesar, above all he has an undying love for Rome, “Brutus had rather be a villager than to repute himself a son of Rome.” It is this love for Rome that causes such internal turmoil for Brutus, through Shakespeare’s use of juxtaposition of characters, he is able to highlight to the audience, the lengths that man will go to in order to…

    • 987 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Julius Caesar Flaws

    • 2477 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Written by Shakespeare more than one thousand five hundred years after Julius Caesar’s death, Julius Caesar, Shakespeare’s well-known tragedy, is unique in that it contains two tragic characters, the senator Brutus and emperor Caesar. A play in five acts, Julius Caesar attempts to portray the assassination of Caesar, at that time victorious over Pompey’s sons, and the civil war that follows, culminating in the establishment of the Second Triumvirate. Although Caesar meets his end comparatively early in the third act, both Brutus and Caesar are adequately portrayed as men of high repute who, through flawed actions and decisions, meet an untimely end. In short, both are tragic heroes.…

    • 2477 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    omg the foc

    • 1177 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The validity of a specific perspective ultimately relies upon the audience’s deliberation among the multitude of competing perspectives. This fact is apparent from the opening scenes of Julius Caesar where the conflict between the plebeians and the senators establish the underlying political tension. One citizen exclaims, “We make holiday to see Caesar and to rejoice in his triumph!” to which, Murellus immediately conveys his disapproval: “O you hard hearts… Knew you not Pompey?” The rhetorical question effectively communicates his sense of loyalty to the former leader and presents his perspective as possessing a greater moral weight. The reader is further convinced by the dialogue between Brutus and Cassius that Caesar is indeed a tyrant. As Cassius sways Brutus, “We both have fed as well, and we can both Endure the winter’s cold as well as he”, the divisive language between “we” and “he” strengthens his perspective of Caesar as undeserving of his glory. In such ways, rhetoric is the pivotal agent of consolidating one’s perspective.…

    • 1177 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The relationship between Hamlet and Horatio is one of academic engagement, as shown through Horatio’s continual allusions to the rendering of Caesar’s death in the Shakespearean version of the story, which was written concurrently with Hamlet, such as in his description of the ghost’s appearance “in the most high and palmy state of Rome/a little ere the mightiest Julius fell”. This dialogue with history and politics is emphasised through the vehicle of this friendship, and, in using this, Shakespeare questions the virility of the Danish political system and the role of the monarchy. This parallel between Rome after the assassination of Caesar and the rapidly-declining political system of Denmark is furthered by Horatio’s return to this metaphor in the final scene “I am more antique Roman than a Dane”. Through this juxtaposition the audience is forced to call into question Hamlet’s role in the Julius Caesar parallel, creating yet another layer of separation between Hamlet and the audience. It is in Hamlet’s conversations with Horatio that his philosophical musings are most prominent, and through this we can see Horatio as an agent both of Hamlet’s conscience, and of the play’s delay. In John Quincy Adam’s analysis of the play, he points at the friendship between Hamlet and Horatio as being crucial to the development of Hamlet’s moral code which is only the result of “a mind cultivated by the learning acquirable at a university, combining intelligence and sensibility” (Adams, 1839). By characterising Horatio as the intellectual force within the play, and subsequently the source of socio-political commentary, Shakespeare adds to the moral and cultural instability of the play in a manner which results in further delay of confrontation or…

    • 1023 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This essay will attempt to explain the "uncertain vision" present in the themes of Othello and Oedipus the King. In both plays the main characters’ vision is blurred by their inabilities to see the facts that are right under their noses.…

    • 513 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays