Preview

omg the foc

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1177 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
omg the foc
Conflicting perspectives is the inevitable outcome of every individual’s attempt to discern what is right or wrong according to their own subjectivity and intuition. That is precisely why no single perspective is ever entirely righteous or incontrovertibly true. Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar, Scott Derrickson’s Exorcism of Emily Rose and David Kelley’s Boston Legal are prime examples of how conflicting perspectives not only occur between individuals but within the psyche of the self. It is in essence a battle of rhetoric and the art of language that dictates which perspective will ultimately triumph over another. Whether it is an endeavour to arrive at the truth or an attempt to settle a dispute, one’s perspective is always the product of theatrics and persuasive delivery.

The validity of a specific perspective ultimately relies upon the audience’s deliberation among the multitude of competing perspectives. This fact is apparent from the opening scenes of Julius Caesar where the conflict between the plebeians and the senators establish the underlying political tension. One citizen exclaims, “We make holiday to see Caesar and to rejoice in his triumph!” to which, Murellus immediately conveys his disapproval: “O you hard hearts… Knew you not Pompey?” The rhetorical question effectively communicates his sense of loyalty to the former leader and presents his perspective as possessing a greater moral weight. The reader is further convinced by the dialogue between Brutus and Cassius that Caesar is indeed a tyrant. As Cassius sways Brutus, “We both have fed as well, and we can both Endure the winter’s cold as well as he”, the divisive language between “we” and “he” strengthens his perspective of Caesar as undeserving of his glory. In such ways, rhetoric is the pivotal agent of consolidating one’s perspective.
Exorcism of Emily Rose conveys the notion that a particular perspective is given absolute validity and authority when the speaker best exploits the power of

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    In response to how the same information formulates disagreeing opinions between experts in a particular discipline, I have recognized a few main ways in which differing viewpoints are produced. Firstly, pre-established beliefs and notions can affect the way in which people perceive purely factual information. Secondly, the factual information may be presented in such a way that it is emotionally charged while still maintaining a purely factual nature. These trends are particularly evident within the disciplines of judicial ethics and history.…

    • 1464 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Passionate convictions and articulating views are represented in texts, which contribute to the manipulation of our views. These elements are evident in Shakespeare’s ‘Julius Caesar,’ ABC News’ article, ‘Bill Henson’s case’ and Kev Carmondy’s song ‘This Land is Mine/This Land is Me.’ The primary stimulus, ‘Julius Caesar’ shows how an individual’s perspective can be defined as a way of seeing or interpreting a situation or set of facts based on a certain level of judgment, whilst Carmondy and ABC New’s text help supplement and reinforce the differing perspectives.…

    • 1105 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Now, Shakespeare was a famous playwright of the time and it seemed logical for him to express his ideologies through his popular plays to comment on his society. Shakespeare was able to use scenes such as the Brutus vs. Antony orations to stress the conflicting ideals between truth and propaganda, as well as their effects on society. Shakespeare captures Brutus’s honesty when he states “I honour him; but as he was ambitious, I slew him” through his use of prose within the speech. Prose reveals to the audience of plebeians Brutus’ rational and logical thinking behind assassinating Caesar, to which he emphasised “not that I loved Caesar less, but I loved Rome more.” The way in which Brutus excuses his actions appears to be beneficiary to the population instead for his selfish purposes, as well as depicting Caesar as a negative influence to the Roman Empire. This is soon contradicted by Antony’s oration which was written in blank verse. The speech mocks as well as contrasts Brutus’ intentions implicitly though the repetition of “But Brutus is an honourable man” which follows conflicting contradictory statements. This depicts Antony’s oration skills as both more superior and authentic to Brutus’s speech as it exposes the contrast between higher and lower order rhetoric. Brutus’s and Antony’s orations, create a powerful…

    • 1383 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Soon after the last breaths of one of Rome’s most popular general, Julius Caesar, Antony and Brutus were speaking in front of the people of Rome. Both cunning leaders were nimble in the art of persuasion and manipulation. The beloved leaders used the Ethos, Pathos, and Logos methods of persuasion to sway the crowd to his respective view of the actions of the night and their former general Julius Caesar.…

    • 419 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    All texts are deliberately constructed to convey an agenda and a set of values. This means that every composer has a purpose, which is based on the issues arising from their context and audience. To that end, the composer uses conflicting perspectives as a vehicle for successfully conveying their purpose to the audience. So, through the representation of events, personalities and situations (which utilises form, language and structural devices), the responder is positioned to accept the perspective that the composer has represented as valid or credible. As a consequence, the composer is able to successfully impart their values to the audience. Examples of conflicting perspectives in society and the media come in the form of William Shakespeare’s…

    • 987 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Every text is constructed for a purpose; the composer is trying to convey and embed their agenda into the reader by persuading them to accept their perspective on key events, personalities and/or situations. Through the manipulation of various textual forms, structures and language composers persuade their audience to adopt their perspective. Composers often decide to present conflicting perspectives to truly engage their audience. By demonstrating the concept of conflicting perspectives the composer is able to glorify their perspective in contrast to another to enforce their agenda, they position the audience through language to side with them. The tight narrative “Julius Caesar” by William Shakespeare’s utilises the final days of Caesar’s…

    • 1439 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Textual form has heavily shaped my own understanding of conflicting perspectives through the way people’s…

    • 266 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Without any power, a society tends to become irrational, indecisive and flavorless. This ideal is portrayed in all scenes including plebeians, whether through direct or indirect characterization. The premiering scene portrayed Marullus and Flavius along the streets, scolding commoners for being hypocrites. “You blocks, you stones, you worse than senseless things!/O you hard hearts, you cruel men of Rome,/Knew you not Pompey?” (1.1.27-29) was proclaimed by Marullus, in protest of Caesars’ celebrations. This reveals that the common people of Rome are easily swayed, as they cheered for Caesar defeating his predecessor, after recently cheering for Pompey himself. An exquisite example of the citizens’ complacency comes from the Third Plebeian. He states,“The noble Brutus is ascended: silence” (3.2.14) but yet, after a short speech from Antony regarding the conspirators, he claims, “There’s not a nobler man in Rome than Antony”( 3.2.96). Furthermore, when attending to Caesar,“We are bless’d that Rome is rid of him”(3.2.48) stated the citizens, only to later say, “They were villains, murderers” (3.2.135) merely for doing the very “ridding” they praised! Complicity and irrationality are portrayed by the violent outburst, “Revenge!—About!—Seek!—Burn!/Fire!—Kill!—Slay! Let not a traitor live” (3.2.183-184) from the citizens, once Antony’s speech is…

    • 539 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar, a play set in Ancient Rome, the characters Calphurnia and Decius are in opposition. Calphurnia hopes to prompt her husband,Caesar, to stay at home instead of going to the Senate because she fears that Caesar's life is in jeopardy. Decius, in this case Calpurnia’s adversary, wants to persuade Caesar that he should in fact go to the Senate where his doomed fate awaits him. Shakespeare uses many rhetorical devices in Calpurnia's conversation and Decius’ conversation with Caesar, each attempting to convince Caesar to take their side.…

    • 1412 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Before his speech begins, the whole crowd is going wild with overwhelming support for Brutus. Knowing this, Antony is quickly able to capture the attention of the people by saying, “For Brutus’ sake, I am beholding to you” (64). By starting off with saying that Brutus endorses whatever Antony is able to say, they are suddenly more curious to hear what he say and what exactly their beloved Brutus approves of. By saying this, Antony is able to borrow Brutus’ honest reputation and use it as his own. Towards the end of his speech, Antony borrows Caesar’s renewed ethos, once again merging voices and giving Antony even more credibility. He asks the audience, “Wherein hath Caesar thus deserved your love?” (234). Antony successfully borrows Caesar’s great reputation and increases his credibility for the people to trust him.…

    • 684 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marc Antony, Brutus, and Cassius are all critical characters in William Shakespeare’s famous play, The Tragedy of Julius Caesar. Due to their distinctive personalities and values, there is no trait that all of these characters share, although they do share some traits with one another. Firstly, Marc Antony and Cassius are manipulative in nature, while Brutus is not. Secondly, the root of Brutus and Cassius’ failure is their personality flaw, while Marc Antony proves strong in all the ways they prove weak. Lastly, Antony and Cassius, unlike Brutus, do not separate their private affairs from their public actions while acts only with honor and virtue and completely ignores his personal concerns.…

    • 642 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The exposition of Julius Caesar, Shakespeare immediately presents the ideals that underpin the differing views of Caesar’s rising power through his two protagonists, Brutus and Cassius. Both characters posses different interpretations on Caesar’s reign on Rome, one being loyal to Rome and a love and respect for Caesar “I love him well” but the other being a spiteful and vitriolic towards a “feeble old tyrant.” This highlights the notion of Cassius’s selfish prejudice towards his own contentment, which is only shown behind closed doors. Brutus on the other hand is victim to Cassius’ vitriol and becomes the pawn as he is manipulated “poor Brutus, with himself at war,” Brutus is troubled emotionally, torn by his patriotism and his respect for Caesar, above all he has an undying love for Rome, “Brutus had rather be a villager than to repute himself a son of Rome.” It is this love for Rome that causes such internal turmoil for Brutus, through Shakespeare’s use of juxtaposition of characters, he is able to highlight to the audience, the lengths that man will go to in order to…

    • 987 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Literature naturally comes to mind as a rich resource for the study of persuasion. To persuade someone completely, one must use rhetorical devices to overcome one of the three key decision making factors: Logos, Pathos, and Ethos. One major concern of Shakespeare’s play Julius Caesar is about rhetoric, the skill of persuading people with words. Appeals to logos, pathos and ethos are effectively made to reveal the characters as seen in Cassius, Brutus and Mark Antony respectively throughout the play.…

    • 368 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Justice Game

    • 941 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Representations of divergent viewpoints using different textual forms leads to a greater understanding of conflicting perspectives and the multi-layered nature of complicated issues. By comparing conflicting perspectives, we come to understand the complexity of a certain issue and also that despite the textual form, a text’s purpose is to promote the composer’s perspective. This has been achieved through my study of Geoffrey Robertson’s 1998 memoir The Justice Game, which discourages involving emotion in the justice system and suggests that the current system is effective, the conflicting 2013 7.30 Report episode “Jill Meagher’s husband calls her killer’s sentence a disgrace” which uses emotion to communicate the flaws in the justice system., and the Michael Leunig 2013 cartoon Julian Assange from The Age, which supports Robertson’s view that the courtroom must be impartial and not biased by personal emotion.…

    • 941 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    At once, the playwright reveals the consequences of uneducated masses conflicting with elitist nobility, while scathing the incentive for opportunist endeavours within a republic polity. The tragic hero’s demise shines a spotlight on the negative effects of hero-worship as an attempt to unify a national ethos, whilst the introduction and subsequent deconstruction of the body politic fable serves to enlighten the audience towards the rhetorical dangers of ideological persuasion. The setting of the Roman Republic serves to shackle the play to the planes of realism, establishing it as an insight into how the inherent sociological flaws of humankind prevent policies being guided towards the common…

    • 1631 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays