Preview

Julius Caesar Conflicting Perspectives Analysis

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1383 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Julius Caesar Conflicting Perspectives Analysis
Module C - REPRESENTATION AND TEXT: Conflicting Perspectives.
You are to produce a contribution to an online HSC Tutorial. You are to record and upload an answer to the question below. It is to be no longer than seven minutes and no less than five minutes.

Conflicting perspectives exist within texts and their representation is affected by the context of the composer.
Using your prescribed text and a related text of your own choosing, assess the impact of this statement on a contemporary audience.
Hello user coolkitty96, and the rest of HSC tutorial users who will stumble across this video, you seem to be having some trouble with Julius Caesar in Module C, are you not? Well no fear of Shakespeare, as I am here! I believe what you should
…show more content…

Now, Shakespeare was a famous playwright of the time and it seemed logical for him to express his ideologies through his popular plays to comment on his society. Shakespeare was able to use scenes such as the Brutus vs. Antony orations to stress the conflicting ideals between truth and propaganda, as well as their effects on society. Shakespeare captures Brutus’s honesty when he states “I honour him; but as he was ambitious, I slew him” through his use of prose within the speech. Prose reveals to the audience of plebeians Brutus’ rational and logical thinking behind assassinating Caesar, to which he emphasised “not that I loved Caesar less, but I loved Rome more.” The way in which Brutus excuses his actions appears to be beneficiary to the population instead for his selfish purposes, as well as depicting Caesar as a negative influence to the Roman Empire. This is soon contradicted by Antony’s oration which was written in blank verse. The speech mocks as well as contrasts Brutus’ intentions implicitly though the repetition of “But Brutus is an honourable man” which follows conflicting contradictory statements. This depicts Antony’s oration skills as both more superior and authentic to Brutus’s speech as it exposes the contrast between higher and lower order rhetoric. Brutus’s and Antony’s orations, create a powerful …show more content…

Carlos Latuff began satirically cartooning this issue after his visit to the Gaza strip in the 1990’s. He is of Mexican descent; therefore his background doesn’t affect his views as much as if he was Israeli or Palestinian, though his perception of what is true and what is right drive his work. Through the picture “Israeli side vs. Palestinian Side” (2009) his focus on anti-capitalism, anti-globalisation and anti-US military intervention is highlighted. This representation is heavily critical on Israel, who is associated with all of that, as it depicts a “spot the difference” situation; by displaying two similar cartoons in essence, which then have been altered to depict Latuff’s perspective on the events. On the left side, the Israeli perspective on the war, according to the composer, is shown with a small bomb, appearing to be faulty, landing in the street, surrounded by a shocked crowd with no apparent visible damage. On the right side, labelled “Palestinian side” a distressing scene is depicted with crumbling buildings, fire, blood and death present within the visual. The way in which the cartoon is composed suggests to the audience an exaggeration of the situation, a common form within political cartoons. Having said

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The Republican period of Roman history began in 509 BCE after the last Etruscan kings was dropped. The Republic was controlled by the Senate, which was an assembly by dominated upper-class families. This dominance by the aristocracy led to tensions between the social classes, especially among the lower classes who fought for equality in both the economy and the government. Despite these inner struggles, Rome's military power strengthened throughout the 5th and 4th centuries BCE and by 270 BCE they commanded the entire peninsula. 264 BCE brought the beginning of the three Punic Wars fought against Carthage over control of the western Mediterranean. These resulted in victories for Rome which granted them access to the wealth of Greece, Egypt,…

    • 803 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Julius Caesar, a historical tragedy appeals to an audience fearing Elizabeth 1 imminent death without an heir and consequence civil war, religious conflict and external threats.  embodies his values in distinctive, engaging, contrasting characters and their relationship with each other…

    • 1311 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    As a tragic hero Brutus possesses a flaw of naivety. Brutus is too trusting in others, such as the conspirators. The conspirators believed that Caesar was too ambitious and that they should kill him for the good of Rome, themselves and for their own personal benefit. Brutus trusted that they were conspiring to kill him for the sake of Rome. (Quote). He was also naïve by letting Antony speak at Caesar’s funeral. Brutus believed that Antony would praise Caesar at his funeral and follow the rules that he was given. Brutus trusted him and by letting him speak Antony turned all the Romans against him. Antony sparked a civil war by convincing the Romans that the conspirators that they did wrong. Since Antony turned all the Romans against him, he…

    • 161 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Every text is constructed for a purpose; the composer is trying to convey and embed their agenda into the reader by persuading them to accept their perspective on key events, personalities and/or situations. Through the manipulation of various textual forms, structures and language composers persuade their audience to adopt their perspective. Composers often decide to present conflicting perspectives to truly engage their audience. By demonstrating the concept of conflicting perspectives the composer is able to glorify their perspective in contrast to another to enforce their agenda, they position the audience through language to side with them. The tight narrative “Julius Caesar” by William Shakespeare’s utilises the final days of Caesar’s…

    • 1439 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Scheming, manipulation, and backstabbing are common in almost every society in this day and age. As seen on many occasions in Julius Caesar, the conspirators spend a lot of the play plotting against Caesar,because they fear what he might do if he comes to power. Brutus is portrayed as the tragic hero, and he gives numerous speeches to convey his opinions and feelings about the subject matter. In William Shakespeare’s play, The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, the character Marcus Brutus makes many appeals to rhetoric, specifically ethos and pathos, in order to get his point across to the audience.…

    • 683 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Shakespeare's Julius Caesar, Decius Brutus and Mark Antony, both Roman Senators, eulogize Julius Caesar, each using a different technique and approach. Brutus, in a somewhat arrogant, to the point, eulogy, attempts to sway the people. He justifies conspiring against Caesar by stating that Caesar's ambition would have hurt Rome. However, in Antony's eulogy, he focuses on Caesar's positive traits, and cunningly disproves Brutus' justification for killing Caesar. The fickle Romans waver between leaders, responding emotionally, rather than intellectually, to the orators.<br><br>Brutus seeks to explain why he conspired against Caesar. He begins his speech with "Romans, countrymen ...", appealing to their consciousness as citizens of Rome, who,…

    • 844 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Julius Caesar Thesis

    • 2140 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Gaius Julius Caesar lived from 100- 44 BC and was a prominent person in the last few decades of the Roman Empire. He was skilled as a speaker and writer, an intelligent politician and fantastic general, but he was also very brutal in his chase of selfish goals. These goals were not only having complete power over the Roman republic, but also credit as being a god. Caesar was born in 102 or 100 BCE into the ancient patrician family of the Iulii who claimed ancestry from Aeneas of Troy, one of the mythical founders of Rome, and the goddess Venus, but few members of the family had distinguished themselves in the previous generations. Caesar's father arrived at the praetor-ship, but never won the election for the consulship. The years of his youth…

    • 2140 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Shakespeare’s interpretation of Julius Caesar’s assassination titled, Julius Caesar, a man named Cassius is attempting to get the help and alliance of a fellow Roman named Brutus in the conspiracy of assassinating the Roman leader. He accomplishes this in constructed and detailed monologues to persuade Brutus to join the conspiracy. In each of Cassius’ monologues, Cassius strategically uses appeals and rhetorical devices to ultimately give a successful and persuasive speech to his audience, Brutus.…

    • 895 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, the common people played a critical role. They are not very dedicated to a certain side; they tend to switch depending on popularity or role. The common people tend to focus on the stronger person in power. They were for Pompey, but as soon as Julius Caesar defeated him in battle, they immediately switched sides and joined the followers of Julius Caesar. The people of Rome were never on one side for too long. They switched sides multiple times in The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, which favored certain characters and disfavored others. The commoners play a critical part in Caesar’s reign and the conspirators’ plan to kill Caesar while being able…

    • 654 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    We all know that, in life, one tiny misconception can deliver catastrophic results. That is especially true in the works of Shakespeare (except, in Shakespeare, everyone ends up dead). Cassius’s forged letters, Decius’s conversation with Caesar, and Pindarus’s misreading of Titinius’ battle against Antony are all prime examples of the fallacies in Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar and their outcomes.…

    • 563 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Julius Caesar is one of Shakespeare's greatest works. It is about a group of conspirators in Rome who kill their king, Julius Caesar. The play follows the life of Brutus (at the time) - a conspirator yet an honourable man. His rival throughout the novel is Mark Antony- Caesar’s good friend. The pair’s likeness and unlikeness becomes clear at Caesar’s funeral where both make a speech justifying what one another is doing. Brutus appeals to the plebeian’s minds unlike Antony who speaks to their hearts and ultimately wins them over.…

    • 601 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Julius Caesar Essay

    • 883 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Why do honorable people end up with a downfall for their achievements? William Shakespeare with his knowledge of human nature shows Brutus and Cassius’s behaviors as idealistic and realistic in one of his most tragic plays Julius Caesar. The main theme Shakespeare uses in the play is idealism v realism. Julius Caesar the new king of Rome possesses too much power; therefore, Cassius with his realistic views tries to lead people of Rome to decease Caesar’s leadership. Brutus, a good friend of Caesar, wants the welfare for Rome; however, the conspirators persuade Brutus to their site against powerful Caesar. Shakespeare shows several examples of Brutus being idealistic and Cassius very realistic. The example of Brutus’s idealistic side is when he declines to swear an oath. Another one is when Cassius wants to kill Antony but Brutus refuses because in his mind it is too bloody. The third mistake Brutus has done by letting Antony to speak on Caesar’s funeral. In William Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar, Shakespeare uses Brutus to show his readers that a tragic flaw can lead to a downfall.…

    • 883 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In addition, Caesar faced conflict with other people throughout his life. For example, Caesar was threatened by the Germanic various times when he joined the army. After being threatened from the Germanic tribe various times, he decided to build a bridge and march to their tribe to tell them that that didn't fear them. They then marched back and broke the bridge to make sure they don't come near them again. Caesar had always been worried about the Germans in battle since there were a lot more and stronger army men, but Julius kept his confidence and went on for the battle. “When the Germanic tribes seemed threatening to invade, Caesar built a bridge over the Rhine River” (Mark web). This conflict affected the way Caesar chose to fight back…

    • 134 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In using Julius Caesar as a central figure, Shakespeare is less interested in portraying a figure of legendary greatness than he is in creating a character who is consistent with the other aspects of his drama. If Brutus and Cassius were eminently evil men insidiously planning the cold-blooded murder of an eminently admirable ruler, Julius Caesar would be little more than a melodrama of suspense and revenge. On the other hand, if Caesar were wholly the bloody tyrant, there would be little cause for Brutus' hesitation and no justification for Antony's thirst for revenge. In fact, Shakespeare creates in Caesar a character who is sometimes reasonable, sometimes superstitious, sometimes compassionate, and sometimes arrogantly aloof. In so doing, he has projected Caesar as a man whom…

    • 782 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Unlike Antony, Brutus tries to defend himself for the assassination of Caesar for “Rome’s sake”. Antony tries to defend Caesar and save his reputation from Brutus's statement, “ambitious”, by using logos and pathos towards the public and the people of Rome. Antony started off with Brutus’s description towards Caesar and the type of relationship he had with Caeser. He starts off using logic, “He hath brought many captives home to Rome, Whose ransoms did the general coffers fill...” (Shakespeare 82). Antony also points out how he offered the crown to Caesar three times but denied it those three times. He uses this examples to let the people of Rome see what Caesar did in his power. He also questions the public if this makes Caesar look ambitious, which questioned and changed the public’s point of view on Caesar. He also questioned and changed the public’s point of view on Caesar when he creates sarcasm by saying that Brutus is an honorable man. He later uses pathos, “When that poor have cried, Caesar hath wept” (Shakespeare 20). He shows how Caesar cared for the people of Rome and how an “ambitious” person would not do that. Antony contradicts Brutus’s statement with logos and pathos using examples Caesar did good to Rome and questions the public if an ambitious person would do…

    • 847 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays