Preview

Mark Antony Speech In Julius Caesar

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
847 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Mark Antony Speech In Julius Caesar
In the play The Tragedy of Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare, the reader has the opportunity to experience the intense speeches after the death of Julius Caesar. The first speech at the funeral of Julius Caesar is given by a conspirator, Brutus, followed by the speech of Caesar’s right-hand man, Mark Antony. Mark Antony connects to the audience through emotion, while Brutus appeals to the logic of the audience. Similarly to Mark Antony and Brutus, former President Barack Obama gave a speech following the mass shooting that occurred at Sandy Hook Elementary. All of these powerful leaders attempted to reassure the audience after a tragedy by appealing to their emotion and providing logical reasoning to justify their claim. Throughout the …show more content…
Unlike Antony, Brutus tries to defend himself for the assassination of Caesar for “Rome’s sake”. Antony tries to defend Caesar and save his reputation from Brutus's statement, “ambitious”, by using logos and pathos towards the public and the people of Rome. Antony started off with Brutus’s description towards Caesar and the type of relationship he had with Caeser. He starts off using logic, “He hath brought many captives home to Rome, Whose ransoms did the general coffers fill...” (Shakespeare 82). Antony also points out how he offered the crown to Caesar three times but denied it those three times. He uses this examples to let the people of Rome see what Caesar did in his power. He also questions the public if this makes Caesar look ambitious, which questioned and changed the public’s point of view on Caesar. He also questioned and changed the public’s point of view on Caesar when he creates sarcasm by saying that Brutus is an honorable man. He later uses pathos, “When that poor have cried, Caesar hath wept” (Shakespeare 20). He shows how Caesar cared for the people of Rome and how an “ambitious” person would not do that. Antony contradicts Brutus’s statement with logos and pathos using examples Caesar did good to Rome and questions the public if an ambitious person would do

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In the eulogy at Caesar’s funeral, Marc Antony, close friend of Caesar and general, seems to claim that he believes that Marcus Brutus and the rest of the men involved with the death of Caesar are honorable men, but in actuality believes that Caesar was the only honorable man in the Senate who was always there for his country and brought prosperity to his country. He also claims to not want to get revenge on the murderers of Caesar, but in reality, the whole point of his speech was to turn the citizens of Rome against Brutus so that Caesar’s death will be avenged. He develops this claim by first creating ethos and pathos refuting Brutus’ excuse that Caesar was ambitious. Then, he emphasizes the grand betrayal of Brutus towards Caesar. Towards…

    • 251 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He asserts, "Not that I loved Caesar less, but that I loved Rome more" (III, ii, 21-22), framing the act as a sacrifice for the greater good of the Republic. This logical appeal aims to convince the audience of the righteousness of his cause. However, despite Brutus's eloquence and persuasive techniques, Antony's speech surpasses his in terms of emotional impact and strategic manipulation of the crowd's sentiments. Antony, while ostensibly paying tribute to Caesar, cleverly undermines Brutus's credibility and incites the crowd against the conspirators.…

    • 410 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mark Antony deftly speaks to his audience in a way that requires them to challenge their preconceived characterizations of Brutus and Cassius. He intentionally expresses the deliberate opposite of what he genuinely wishes and excessively compliments the people to the point that they forget their own seemingly unwavering convictions. His finesse and dexterity in bending words and minds ultimately works to his favor. Antony accomplishes his initial goal to convince the Roman people to revenge Caesar’s demise. This achievement in and of itself exhibits…

    • 613 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Et tu Brute?” words came out Caesar’s mouth like a slap to the face. Brutus knew in his heart right then and there that things were going to go down hill. As soon as Antony heard what had happened at the capital, he knew that what he said in his speech would be to his advantage. The play written by early english playwright, William Shakespeare, is about the tragic death of Julius Caesar. It takes place in Rome, and tells the historical story of how Caesar was brutally murdered, and the terrible fate of the conspirators who killed him. At Caesar’s funeral, Antony presents a speech to the crowd, as well did Brutus. Antony, though, had the most effective speech, by using important literary techniques, such as pathos, ethos, and strategic word choice, William Shakespeare, “The Tragedy of Julius Caesar.”…

    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Shakespeare's Julius Caesar, Decius Brutus and Mark Antony, both Roman Senators, eulogize Julius Caesar, each using a different technique and approach. Brutus, in a somewhat arrogant, to the point, eulogy, attempts to sway the people. He justifies conspiring against Caesar by stating that Caesar's ambition would have hurt Rome. However, in Antony's eulogy, he focuses on Caesar's positive traits, and cunningly disproves Brutus' justification for killing Caesar. The fickle Romans waver between leaders, responding emotionally, rather than intellectually, to the orators.<br><br>Brutus seeks to explain why he conspired against Caesar. He begins his speech with "Romans, countrymen ...", appealing to their consciousness as citizens of Rome, who,…

    • 844 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Antony loved Caesar and was completely against his murder, so he used rhetorical strategies to persuade the Romans to be against the perpetrators. For example when Antony says “Yet Brutus says he was ambitious, and Brutus is an honorable man” he is using the mix of sarcasm and logos. Antony repeats this same thing over and over again until the Romans start questioning if Brutus truly is an honorable man. His sarcasm and repetition were both great rhetorical tactics that were used to manipulate and confuse the Roman’s minds. Antony brings together the perfect amount of ethos and pathos when he states, “ ‘Tis his will. Let but the commons hear this testament- which pardon me, I do not mean to read- And they would go and kiss dead Caesar’s wounds And dip their napkins in his sacred blood,” (III,ii,127-132). This is essential because it shows that Antony is credible and trustworthy because he has Caesar’s will. This also appeals to the people’s emotions because they become saddened over Caesar’s death. Antony used his tactics to make the Romans trust him and his views, which led to them rioting against the perpetrators. His use of ethos, pathos, and logos convinced the people that the assassination of Caesar was a cruel act and that Brutus, Cassius, and the other perpetrators are…

    • 940 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Senators Swansong

    • 913 Words
    • 4 Pages

    How can one man’s closest friend also be that man’s murderer? This is precisely what happens in Julius Caesar. Brutus kills his closest friend, Julius Caesar, and then he gives his justification for doing so in his speech at Julius Caesar’s own funeral. Although his speech was flawed, the crowd of people he spoke to were easily swayed, and they accepted Brutus’ justification. Unfortunately for Brutus, he allowed Mark Antony, another one of Caesar’s close friends to speak after him. His speech completely reversed the crowd’s opinion. Comparing Brutus and Antony’s funeral speeches is an important topic because it is a turning point in the conspirator’s attempts to sway the Roman people. The comparison shows how a few crucial errors on the conspirator’s part, along with a great speech by Antony, completely altered the outcome of the entire play. In comparing Brutus and Antony’s speeches, it becomes evident that Antony’s speech was much more effective than Brutus’ speech in four key areas: ethos, pathos, logos, and chronos.…

    • 913 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Everything that was said by Brutus was completely blown away by what Antony says even though he never said anything bad about Brutus. Brutus and Antony are both very good at ethos, pathos and logos, but with the length and persistence of Antony, he won the crowd. By the end of the speech the people of Rome wanted to kill everyone that was in the conspiracy including…

    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Before his speech begins, the whole crowd is going wild with overwhelming support for Brutus. Knowing this, Antony is quickly able to capture the attention of the people by saying, “For Brutus’ sake, I am beholding to you” (64). By starting off with saying that Brutus endorses whatever Antony is able to say, they are suddenly more curious to hear what he say and what exactly their beloved Brutus approves of. By saying this, Antony is able to borrow Brutus’ honest reputation and use it as his own. Towards the end of his speech, Antony borrows Caesar’s renewed ethos, once again merging voices and giving Antony even more credibility. He asks the audience, “Wherein hath Caesar thus deserved your love?” (234). Antony successfully borrows Caesar’s great reputation and increases his credibility for the people to trust him.…

    • 684 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rhetorical Analysis

    • 611 Words
    • 3 Pages

    By depicting Brutus’ speech he starts to create doubt and begin to inquire about the logic behind Antony argument against the conspirators. Once he had aroused this feeling of doubt in the plebeians Antony was able to continue with his argument with much more strength and confidence. A point extremely important in Antony's eulogy is persuading the crowd to view Caesar not as a the ambitious man Brutus made him out to be. The evidence that Antony gave the crowd which persuaded them into believing that Caesar was not indeed ambitious, was that "He hath brought many captives home to Rome, / Whose ransoms did the general coffers fill/.. I thrice presented him.a kingly crown/ Which he did thrice refuse. Was this ambition?/ Yet Brutus says he…

    • 611 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He wants citizens to feel as if it is their responsibility to contribute to the situation. The rhetoric device, pathos, allows him to stir up empathy and patriotism in his audience. Obama wants citizens to feel for the victims and their families; he wants them to feel patriotism and band together for more gun safety laws. While Obama’s speech is for citizens to want more gun control, Antony’s speech is for the plebeians to rise up against Brutus and the other conspirators. Although the rhetoric device, pathos, was present in his speech, it is less effective than it is in Obama’s. Antony’s speech consists of events that occur in Caesar’s life that show that he is not ambitious. By telling the plebeians this, he is saying that Brutus and the other conspirators did not have the right to kill Caesar. Antony makes the plebeians feel like they are “men that have lost their reason” (III.ii.115). By sharing these contradicting events, Antony provokes doubt and guilt in the plebeians. While it is true that people tend to act on their emotions instead of logic, Antony’s speech has only planted a seed of guilt and doubt in their…

    • 500 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He misjudged Antony’s loyalty to Caesar and to Rome, calling him “but a limb of Caesar,” (Act II. Sc. I). Because of his altered perception in judgment, Brutus thought that every leader in Rome was as noble as him, acting for the good of the republic, which wasn’t entirely the case. Brutus was easily convinced that Mark Antony had joined the conspirators’ side after the death of Caesar and was unable to see through his false promises. Brutus never thought that the death of Caesar would provoke such a reaction from Antony because he assumed that every politician in Rome held clear distinctions between their private and public lives, concerning their duties in…

    • 720 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Julius Caesar

    • 464 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Brutus was a devious man, even though what he thought he was doing was right. Brutus told his fellow conspirators to kill Caesar "boldly, but not angerly."(3.1.256-257) Brutus was one of Caesars right hand men, and yet Brutus kills his own friend. When Antony asks to speak at Caesars funeral, Cassius says no, but Brutus tell him that Antony will speak, but only what Brutus tells him to say. Brutus also embraces the fact that he just killed his friend, and also tells the senators who had just witnessed it to not be afraid, but to stay because ambition has paid its debt.…

    • 464 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Antony ends up using pathos, his emotion, to have a better connection with the plebeians. He used certain words to make the crowd sad, angry, and trusting. To make the crowd sad he would use words such as mourn, death, funeral, coffin, and disapprove. Using those words, he had made the crowd sad about losing a strong leader. But to help make the crowd trust him, he would use words such as honorable, rich, and legacy. To show the crowd that he honored and loved Caesar he would use words like heart and praise. By using these words he would sway the crowd to do what he wants. Brutus ended up not being manipulative with his words. He tried to have the crowd trust and agree with him but the words he used didn’t have as big of an effect as Antony’s did. Brutus used fear as a tactic to have the plebeian’s side with him. He asked if they would rather have Caesar “living, and die all slaves, than that Caesar were dead, to live all freemen?(III. ii.24-25). Brutus ended up hurting himself by saying this because he made the plebeians second think their grief. Antony didn’t force the crowd to do anything that they didn’t want to do. He allowed them to choose for themselves. Antony’s words stirred the crowd more and got a bigger wave than Brutus. Brutus talked about how ambitious Caesar was but didn’t move…

    • 1162 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Antony's speech, he talks about the bad things that Caesar has done and how Brutus was ambitious. It says, "The noble Brutus hath told you Caesar was ambitious. If it were so, it was grievous fault, and grievously hath Caesar answered it." (III.ii.75-78) Which is a logo because it is a logic on how Caesar and Brutus are both ambitious. It also says, "But Brutus says he was ambitious, and Brutus is an honorable man. He hath brought many captives home to Rome whose ransoms did the general coffers fill." (III.ii.84-87) Which means that Brutus is an straightforward man by reason of him brought captives home. Antony is speaking satisfactory about Brutus so the people would listen to Antony more effectively because of the nice things he is saying.…

    • 508 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays