Preview

How credible is Enobarbus as the source that reveals the most about Antony’s tragic decline?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
872 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How credible is Enobarbus as the source that reveals the most about Antony’s tragic decline?
In many ways the character of Enobarbus is the most accurate and reliable source for the audience to reveal the most about Antony’s tragic decline, and so therefore he is the most credible. This is perhaps most prominent when Enobarbus is talking with Agrippa and Maecenas in Act 2 Scene 3 and when Maecenas’ character tells him that “Now Antony must leave [Octavia] utterly”, the reply is “Never! He will not.” This shows the audience that Enobarbus’ character knows the most about Antony, as he is the only character who knows that Antony will never leave Cleopatra, and so he is the only character that is able to show the audience the scale of the tragic decline that Antony will experience. The fact that the phrase has masculine stresses on the “Never!” and “not” would have shown a Jacobean audience how assertive Enobarbus’ character was on this point and how sure he is that Antony will leave Octavia for Cleopatra, which fore-shadows Antony’s tragic decline as a Jacobean audience would have known the story of Antony and Cleopatra, and so hearing his character say this would have made him a very credible source that reveals the most about Antony’s tragic decline. Also, as the stresses are masculine, it would have portrayed Enobarbus’ character as a very strong and assertive male figure at this point in the play, which would have meant that a Jacobean audience would have seen the information he gives to them more reliable as the men were the dominant figures who were always correct, again making him more credible to reveal the most information about Antony’s tragic decline.
Another point in the play that shows how credible Enobarbus is as the source that reveals the most about Antony’s tragic decline is during the conversation between his character and the character of Menas in Act 2 Scene 6. During this conversation, and despite being enemies, both characters are very open and honest with each other, which in itself makes Enobarbus a credible source as it shows the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Unscrupulous denotation is having or showing no moral principles; not honest or fair. While Machiavellian denotation is cunning, scheming. Mark Antony is both a unscrupulous person and Machiavellian. He is manipulative by using rhetoric devices to manipulate people, and Antony is also liar because he talks behind his allies back or he tricks his enemies, and finally he is not a faithful to his country when he causes chaos and harms the citizens.…

    • 265 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stating, “'Tis his will. / Let but the commons hear this testament— / Which, pardon me, I do not mean to read” (3.2. 129-131), he knowingly suggests not only the existence of Caesar’s will but his refusal to disclose it’s contents. Again he asserts that he “must not read it” (3.2. 140) but reveals that “it is not meet you know how Caesar loved you” (3.2. 141). If he truly wished for his audience to remain unaware of Caesar’s love for them, he would have safeguarded the secret. By divulging the fact that Caesar indeed cared for them greatly, they subconsciously believe in this emotion. Antony once more affirms that “’Tis good you know not that you are his heirs” (3.2. 145). This line breathes hypocrisy as he explicitly tells the people the good in not knowing the truth he depicts. These mind games create an irresistible tension between Antony and his audience as they now crave even more clandestine…

    • 613 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Antony says some keywords, to make the crowd to believe that he loved him as much as they did. “My heart is in the coffin there with Caesar, and I must pause till it come back to me.” Antony also repeats words to indicate to the crowd that he is sarcastic. “For Brutus says he is ambitious, and Brutus is an honourable man.” Antony uses specific words to turn the crowd onto his side.…

    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although the Darwinian evolution theory came out 150 years ago when it was first introduced in On the Origin of Species in 1859, nowadays there are still many people who firmly believe in the creationism, even some who are well educated. In chapter three of River Out of Eden Richard Dawkins brings out this situation and refutes creationism by citing scientific experiments, and finally he points out that gradualism is a principle of the evolution nature world, one that becomes indispensable when one is trying to explain complex phenomena.…

    • 1061 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In William Shakespeare's Julius Caesar, Marc Antony makes a speech to the people of Rome after Brutus spoke out about killing Caesar with the conspirators. Through Marc Antony’s speech, Shakespeare uses language techniques such as irony, repetition/tone, and figurative language to illuminate conflict between the citizens of Rome and…

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the greatest english authors, Shakespeare, had developed a play called, The Tragedy of Julius Caesar which contains various writing methods. In Act III, one of the main characters, Caesar was killed by Brutus, his companion Antony had constructed a speech for the Romans about Caesar’s death. By comparing Brutus’ and Antony’s speeches, many rhetorical appeals and devices can be seen. Antony was able to gain the trust of the Romans by using Brutus’ loyalty to Caesar. The main goal of Antony’s speech is to persuade the plebeians that Caesar was not ambitious by using ethos and staying calm and emotional as he delivered his oration.…

    • 259 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Antony uses an ironic repetition to advance his efforts for a mutiny in the discrediting of Brutus. Before Antony takes the stage to talk to Rome, Brutus has just given a very lively speech and the Romans are partial to him. It is then necessary for Antony to use dramatic irony to deceive his countrymen that he believes that “…Brutus is an honourable man;” (61). When Antony first describes Brutus as honourable the audience agrees it is only after the fourth time he says this that the whole crowd realize the irony behind what he is saying.. Antony uses this irony to discredit Brutus’s honour and sway the Romans to join in a mutiny against Brutus.…

    • 517 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Second Triumvirate Essay

    • 2399 Words
    • 10 Pages

    * Octavian did not expect the hostile reception from his father’s best friend, Marc Antony. This was shown in two ways:…

    • 2399 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The play called Julius Caesar is about the great Roman leader and his rise to power and fall from power. In the play, a character named Antony was a deeply loyal follower of Julius Caesar and when Julius is betrayed by his companions, Antony cowardly took to their side, as to be allowed to talk at Caesar’s funeral. At the funeral, however, he gives a speech that turns the crowd against the conspirators. Antony’s strategies in the funeral speech proved effective and a good use of rhetorics.…

    • 902 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marc Antony, Brutus, and Cassius are all critical characters in William Shakespeare’s famous play, The Tragedy of Julius Caesar. Due to their distinctive personalities and values, there is no trait that all of these characters share, although they do share some traits with one another. Firstly, Marc Antony and Cassius are manipulative in nature, while Brutus is not. Secondly, the root of Brutus and Cassius’ failure is their personality flaw, while Marc Antony proves strong in all the ways they prove weak. Lastly, Antony and Cassius, unlike Brutus, do not separate their private affairs from their public actions while acts only with honor and virtue and completely ignores his personal concerns.…

    • 642 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Shakespeare positions the audience to view the assassination in negative aspect, through Antony’s passionate eulogy, as compared to Brutus’ austere speech. This is understandable, as given Shakespeare’s Elizabethan context, where the removal of a legitimate leader would be viewed as treason.…

    • 1236 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ethos In Julius Caesar

    • 582 Words
    • 3 Pages

    “Wise men talk because they have something to say; fools, because they have to say something” (Plato). This theme becomes prevalent in William Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar, a historical tragedy. In Act III, Brutus and Antony both deliver eloquent speeches to the plebeian crowd discussing Caesar’s recent death. Brutus, who arises after Caesar’s death as the next leader, speaks only to appease the crowd, but Antony, a close friend of Caesar’s, speaks to rally the people for his causes. Throughout the tragedy, Antony constructs a more convincing argument by utilizing Brutus’ claims against him and manipulating the plebeians’ emotions.…

    • 582 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rhetoric in Julius Caesar

    • 790 Words
    • 4 Pages

    “Friends, Romans, countrymen lend me your ears.” (3.2/ 74) This speech by Mark Antony in Act three Scene two is filled with irony and enthymemes. Mark Antony ignites anger in the audience in and wins them over using rhetoric to prove himself. An enthymeme Antony used to prove the truth about Brutus’ evil ways was mentioning that those who murder their own friends are the unkindest of men. In a sense, Mark Antony indirectly calls Brutus an unkind man. The repetition of calling the murderers honorable men makes a sense of sarcasm in the…

    • 790 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Antony vs Cassius

    • 650 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Antony and Cassius already have a lot of power in Roman society, but who would make a better leader? Leaders in the past have shown that they are a good leader by showing if they have faith, how persuasive they are and how much power they have. In the play Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare, Mark Antony and Cassius both show that they are good leaders, but Antony is a better leader compare to Cassius. Antony and Cassius both compare to each other in faith and how pervasive they are; however they contrasted in power.…

    • 650 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Antony's speech, he talks about the bad things that Caesar has done and how Brutus was ambitious. It says, "The noble Brutus hath told you Caesar was ambitious. If it were so, it was grievous fault, and grievously hath Caesar answered it." (III.ii.75-78) Which is a logo because it is a logic on how Caesar and Brutus are both ambitious. It also says, "But Brutus says he was ambitious, and Brutus is an honorable man. He hath brought many captives home to Rome whose ransoms did the general coffers fill." (III.ii.84-87) Which means that Brutus is an straightforward man by reason of him brought captives home. Antony is speaking satisfactory about Brutus so the people would listen to Antony more effectively because of the nice things he is saying.…

    • 508 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays