People such as Marie Meurdrac from document 2 supported the idea that women can and should pursue the sciences, stating “that minds have no sex and that is the minds of women were cultivated like those of men, they would be equal.” Her booked called “Chemistry Simplified for Women” shows that she was trying to encourage everyday women to also dive into the subject of science. Also supporting how women are both capable and should do science is in document 4, where Johannes Hevelius works alongside with his wife in astronomical research using a sextant. His view on women engaged in science is most likely altered due to the fact he works in such close relation with his wife, therefore he would fully encourage and support her studies. This would also be the reason for the opinion of Gottfried Kirch from document 6. Kirch gave full credit to his wife for the finding of a comet, which shows his understanding of her capabilities. Even though some men and women believed women could be just as educated as men, they were often not credited or shunned out from their studies.…
Bonnie G. Smith, "Gender and the Practices of Scientific History," American Historical Review. 100:4 (1995) 1150-76.…
Subsequently, Spelke states that there have been three arguments that men have a greater cognitive for science. To begin with the first argument many believe that from birth boys are interested in objects and mechanics, while girls are interested in emotions and people. More importantly, people believe that there is a predisposition that makes men more likely to become scientists and mathematicians. Secondly, it is stated that males are intrinsically better at mathematical…
In documents two and five the women’s interests in science, as well as their need for some sort of education were expressed. Document five simply explains that women, as well as men, can hold an interest, as well as succeed in science. In document two, written by Marie Meurdrac, a French scientist, the statement was made that “minds have no sex, and if the minds of…
In Kathleen Okruhlik’s paper, she strives to show that the practice of science as a whole, cannot escape bias, particularly bias in relation to the different sexes. Her argument is thorough, but flawed as it is possible for science to be unbiased. She includes many outdated papers showing how the science was skewed by only using male models, or how scientists are basing assumptions on the idea that male is superior to female, so they use males in their theories and explanations. Her account of why science is biased, is biased in itself as she takes a very feminist view of the situations and in forming her conclusion, but it has been found that bias in more modern science, is no longer a problem. Bias…
Throughout history women have been denied the same social status as men and have been repeatedly excluded from things such as education, politics, and science. This has allowed men to have control over gender roles by controlling the laws, ability to obtain knowledge, and history. Until now, women have been historically excluded women from participating in science which has created a male-dominated and gender biased perspective of science. In the evolutionary sciences such as Sociobiology and Evolutionary Psychology, this male-dominated perspective continues to prevail in its biased reductive portrayal of gender roles which brand females with false stereotypes.…
Throughout history women have not had a large impact in astronomy, a field always predominantly made up of men. However, in the last decade or so, the amount of women involved in astronomy has doubled, growing large enough that one in three potential astronomers is female. Membership surveys of the American Astronomical Society (AAS) show that a drastic increase has occurred in the involvement of women in astronomy. The AAS survey showed that between 1980 and 1990 the amount of women in the society doubled, leading to a 36% total of female astronomers in the AAS. Except for a slightly higher percentage of women working academic jobs, there is no deviation in jobs based on gender, and male and female astronomers seem to be moving to permanent…
Some say a larger head gives room for a bigger, more intelligent brain. Men, thought to have larger heads simply because they're… well men. In which case, men have a larger head size than women, therefore making men smarter than women.…
In general, men earn more than women in almost every job. Most businesses state that they offer equal opportunities for men and women. However, men still dominate the job market and hold the majority of jobs with high prestige. Men usually receive promotions over women that have equal qualifications. Just eleven of the top 1000 companies in the United States have a woman in the companies' highest position (252). In jobs where women are in full time employment, they earn only 76 cents for every dollar earned by men (254). Within the workplace, it is easy to see how men have the upper hand over women and are the ones in control. Generally, female nurses assist male doctors, female secretaries serve male top company officials, and female flight attendants are under the male pilot. Another example can be seen in the educational system. Most kindergarten teachers are female, about half of high school teachers are female, and even fewer women are found as college professors. This shows that as jobs in the education system get more prestigious, men become more numerous in the field.…
There is no equality in women science, we need to do something about it. There have been multiple women across the world that have not gotten the credit that they deserve. Some of these women include: Jocelyn Bell Burnell, she discovered pulsars or remnants of stars that went supernova. Next is Lise Meitner, her work led to the discovery of nuclear fission. last but not least is Nettie Stevens, she found out that the sex/gender of an organism by its chromosomes. All of these women have not gotten the proper recognition that they deserve. some of these women have even been left out of textbooks.…
For many years woman in the scientific field faced systematic oppression in multiple ways. This is important because sentiments of prejudice are still echoed in today's scientific community. Which is imperative to correct on a basis of human rights and reaping the maximum potential possible, through not oppressing half of the population. We can start to remedy the effects of an unfair society with improved maternity benefits, systematic encouragement, and fair appointment of rank and ability.…
Women in science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) majors exemplify the gender gap. “Let me tell you about the trouble with girls. You fall in love with them, they fall in love with you, and when you criticize them, they cry,” said Nobel Laureate, Tim Hunt. (Amarante) Hunt believes that women should be segregated from men in the laboratory as they are a distraction to science. Although Hunt received backlash for his comments, it provides an example of the gender biases affecting women in STEM majors.…
Dr. Chandra Prescod-Weinstein is the 63rd African-American woman to attain a doctorate in physics, and specializes in theoretical physics. Upon further reading, about Dr. Prescod-Weinstein, it begged the question--What are astrophysicists, and why are there a small number of African-American women for who attain PhDs in STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) related fields? Both globally and domestically, there are major differences in girls educated in STEM.…
For a long period of time in human history, women have been treated as the collateral part of the community, the ‘accessories’ of men. Education began to open up for women in recent history and women’s suffrage was achieved only a century ago in the United States. However, the hundred years were not enough time to rid of the prejudice against women that has been molded for past 6,000 years. Sexism against women is still extant today, especially in science fields. As part of the Rocket Team of the Science Club for Girls, a program that promotes more girls in science, I am well aware of how women are still put aside in the science world below the surface of wide recognition.…
Women are less likely to go into jobs that have to do with science or math, not because they don’t have the skill set or aren’t smart enough for it but, because they have more career opportunities than men. Companies can help close the pay gap by making a commitment to their workers that they will be paid fairly. They can also address the gender pay differences on regular bases.…