In the essay, “How schools shortchange boys,” by Gerry Garibaldi, I agree on boys tuning out in a “newly feminized classroom.” Girls may out number boys in graduating from high school with a diploma, but boys give up on school, because they don’t want to be like girls. “Girls are calm and pleasant,” while boys are aggressive and are rationalists. Since girls just do what they are told and write what they need to, for example a project. While girls turn in their assignment days in advance, boys demand when they were given the assignment and act in a disruptive manner. A female teacher might take this as being disrespectful. The disapproval of a female teacher “has a powerful effect on male psyche.” Males squirm from the disapproval when they…
The gap is sometimes small, but over time slight advantages accumulate into big ones.” Girls are most likely to succeed in schools over boys. Many say this is because our educational system has become over feminized. Meaning, many teachers are more sympathetic to girls because they are quite and sit still for hours on end. Where many boys are asked to sit patiently for hours on end in classroom environments where boys struggle to…
Garibaldi has many flaws in his arguments. There is a lack of evidence that “boys will more often than not be shunted to the background in photos or be absent entirely or appear sitting on wheelchairs” (540). Author fails to provide any statistics to support his point. He uses hasty generalization to show that “a female teacher, especially if she has no male children of her own…will tend to view boys’ penchant for challenging classroom assignment as disruptive, disrespectful- rude” (537). Garibaldi conducts that more girls earned high school diplomas than boys and he utilizes percentages to show this, but actual numbers of boys and girls will likely uneven, which could lead to improper results.…
It is proven that students in single-sex schools feel less pressure than their coeducational counterparts. This decrease in pressure results in many advantages for both males and females. Without the distraction of impressing females, males are less competitive and more cooperative. In addition, girls are more willing to speak in public, and exhibit higher levels of confidence and self-esteem. With this decrease in pressure, students will enjoy the learning environment more. This results in an increased attendance frequency because students look forward to school, rather than dreading to attend. Single sex education increases opportunities for leadership as well. In a female single sex environment, girls hold leadership positions that they might not have the opportunity to hold in a coeducational environment. Furthermore, males may be less inhibited to get involved and assume leadership roles in the absence of females. Another benefit of single-sex education is the ability to tailor the environment towards either males or females. This is advantageous because some studies indicate that females learn better in warmer temperature. While males tend to perform better in cooler environments. If this is true, then even the temperature of a single-sex classroom can be set to optimize the learning of either male of female students. The author also explains the opposition to single-sex…
Sexism is another stereotype that is created in the classroom that can have social and academic effects on individuals. Research shows that an oppressive classroom environment impairs learning and academic performance for students oppressed with identities (Pitman, 2010). Sexism in education occurs at an early age. While children of both sexes typically play together, as they get older they spend less and less time playing with children of the opposite sex. When students are lined up according to gender, teachers are stating that boys and girls should be treated differently. When different behaviors are acceptable for boys and not girls because boys will be boys, schools and administrators continue the oppression of girls. Teachers tend to associate girls as being feminine and are praised for being calm, neat, and quiet, whereas boys are encouraged to be self-thinkers, participate, and speak up. By the time students have completed 12 years of schooling, the achievement gap has widened. Females, who generally outperformed the males in their early school years, now trail on all subsections of the Scholastic Aptitude Test (SAT) and the American College Testing Program Examination (ACT), with the greatest discrepancies surfacing in the math and science areas (Dauber,…
These studies and statistics from several resources I have outlined show that gender is, inevitably, a measurable factor when discussing classroom learning styles and teaching methods. One study conducted by Thomas Bartlett and published in The Chronicle of Higher Education, titled The Puzzle of Boys, discusses the difference in learning styles among boys and girls. Bartlett raises the same question most academic researchers have examined in recent years which is: What makes boys learn differently than girls? He points out…
In her essay, “How Male and Female Students Use Language Differently”, Deborah Tannen states that classrooms are more receptive to most men than to most women because our educational system puts more emphasis on challenging debate rather than open-ended discussions. (From Inquiry to Academic Writing) From my own personal classroom experience I agree with her claims.…
The classroom research Holmes mentions in the article is not comprehensive. “Talking in class is often perceived as ‘showing off,’ especially if it is girl-talk. Until recently, girls have preferred to keep a low profile rather than attract negative attention” (303). As a matter of fact, boys do not always dominate the class while girls may therefore be proactive during some issues they interested in. For instance, in math class, girls do not seem to talk less than boys. The teacher preferred to ask girls some calculating questions, as he believed that girls are quicker and more carefully at calculating than boys. But when it comes to some challenging problems in science classes, the boys, on the other hand, tend to doubt what the teacher is saying and explaining their point of view or ask questions. Therefore,…
In academics, women also suffer from sexism at the hands of sexist males in higher positions. In her essay High School Lowdown Miranda J. Van Gelder recounts numerous clear cut instances of such sexist acts as male teachers asking female students to lift up their skirts, making comments referring to the girls taking their rightful place in the kitchen,' and referring to girls by demeaning pet names (Van Gelder, 305). According to Myra and David Sadker's "Failing at Fairness," boys receive more challenging questions, more attention from the teacher, and more helpful feedback. From elementary through college, girls receive less and lower quantity instruction, fewer scholarships, and suffer economic penalties after college: female' jobs are poorly, while women in male' jobs are still paid less then men in the exact same jobs (Sadker, 90).…
It is interesting to look at the history of gender differences in education to see how it has developed in order to gain greater understanding of the current situation. Boys and girls were taught together for the first time in the 1960s, with the development of new comprehensive schools. However, opportunities were not equal for both genders in society at this time, and these values were reflected in the school environment. For…
Sexism against boys from teachers was once again shown in the Boston Globe article, “Schoolboy’s bias suit” by Tracy Jan, a Stanford graduate. Jan writes how at Milton High School, “girls outnumber boys by almost 2 to 1 on the honor roll. In Advanced Placement classes, almost 60 percent of the students are female,” (Jan 1). Unjustifiably lower grades from elementary school take their effect here. Boys think they are dumber than girls and do not take more advanced classes because of the fear of failure. But the sexism extends to inside the classroom on an average school day. Jan notes, “Girls face fewer restrictions from teachers, like being able to wander the hallways without passes, and girls are rewarded for abiding by the rules, while boys’…
According to the Deborah Tannan’s article “How Male and Female Students Participate in Class,” while men suppose it is their duty to contribute to class by speaking up, women do not think that they need to speak up like men do. Most women seem to speak up occasionally when they feel it only requires doing so. Even though a woman speaks up, then she tries to keep silent as long as possible if she feels she would be attacked. A girl communicates in a more intimate and sensitive way with a chosen, trusted one with whom she sits and talks telling secrets. In contrast, for most boys, activities are central, and their best friends are whom they do things with; they bond by exchanging playful insults and put-downs. Moreover, boys communicate in a bolder manner in a hierarchical order usually within a larger group. Tannen uses Father Walter Ong’s book “Fighting for Life”, Hamilton College professor’s classroom experience, and other colleague’s experiences as evidences to support for her claim on class room behavior. Hence, she deduces that debate-like formats as a learning tool make classroom more comfortable to most men than to women. However, I do not agree with Tannan’s representation of behavior in class because modern women not only exhibit independence, control and defiance in almost every aspect of day-to-day life, but also they are becoming successful in classroom just as their male counterparts; the biological differences such as gender have nothing to do with class, and women do speak up in classroom.…
The purpose of this essay is to inform readers of the observations I made during my short stay in Mr. Sutton’s classroom. It also intend to analyze the differences between girls and boys in the learning environment, and in the following areas: how the two groups interact with teachers, how the instructor may reinforce stereotypical gender behavior, supportive teacher responses to boys and girls; and these relative to standards (learning environments) and (assessment) as delineated by the CCSSO (Council of Chief State School Officers, 2011). The definition and expressed purpose of this document is printed in the introduction:…
People in society are taught male patriarchy through education, male dominance is enforced and a masculine view of the world is presented to children, this is shown through the gendered subjects and the teacher treatment of male and female students, even though there are more likely to have females as teachers we tend to see more…
Boys and girls have different methods for learning; girls learn better or understand better by visualizing or hearing their teacher or watching educational videos, instead boys learn more by doing things, like they will find easy if the teacher brought to class a ball and taught them the laws of gravity with a ball. Girls maybe they will like this activity but, they could get annoy because boys can start making jokes or they can start doing other things with the ball, like playing and not letting the girls work with it; this is because scientist say that boys and girls have different rates or ages of maturity like for example a girl of 10 years has the exact maturity or more, but boys mostly will have a maturity of a kid of 8 or 9 years and this make it a little harder for boys and girls to be taught in the same classroom because girls will take it more seriously, boys maybe kind of but they can start making jokes…