General Strain Theory To Explain Juvenile Delinquency

Robert Agnew extended Merton’s strain theory to explain juvenile Delinquency. He called his theory General Strain Theory of delinquency (GST) and broadened strain theory’s focus beyond economic goals and success. Agnew argued that adolescent strain results not only from failure to achieve economic goals, but also from failure to achieve noneconomic goals, the removal of positive stimuli, and the introduction of negative stimuli. Removal of positive stimuli can be the death of a loved one or the ending of a relationship. Examples of the introduction of negative stimuli could be name calling or conflicts with parents. In class we discussed one other main type of strain. This strain results from stressors that can result from failure to achieve valued goods. There are three subtypes. Subtype one is a disconnection between the juvenile’s ambitions and expectations. This subtypes could include failure based on blocked opportunities and lack of ability. Subtype two is stressors caused by the gap
Events that occur closely in time cause more stress than events occurring farther apart. Constant strain leads to several negative emotions, including anger, frustration and discontent. Of these, anger is particularly likely occur when adolescents blame others for their hardship. Because anger increases the desire for revenge and hinders self-control, it, along with other negative emotions, can increase delinquency and drug use. Whether someone does engage in crime depends on a variety of factors, including the individual’s social support networks, relationships with delinquent friends, parental upbringing and personal characteristics such as self-esteem. The many tests of GST generally support it. Various kinds of strain predict delinquency, including the death or serious injury of family member or friends; a change in school or residence; victimization by physical and sexual abuse and other crimes; and