Preview

General Theory of Crime

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2326 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
General Theory of Crime
November 29, 2012
General Theory of Crime There has been much controversy and studies done on Gottfredson and Hirschi’s development of their book-length theory, General Theory of Crime. They discuss ideas and concepts concerning self-control and how that affects an individual’s likelihood of committing criminal acts. If a person lacks in self-control, they are more prone to being deviant given the correct circumstances and factors surrounding their situation. Considered to be such a simple theory, it offers empirical evidence and various explanations as to why deviant individuals choose a different path in contrast to non-deviant, rule-following individuals. However, while simple, it does work to explain a broad spectrum of ideas and provides space for interpretation. In this paper I will be discussing the ideas presented by Gottfredson and Hirschi in their theory regarding self-control as well as the historical and empirical studies done surrounding the General Theory of Crime.
Michael Gottfredson is an American Criminologist who was also the provost at UC Irvine and is currently the president of the University of Oregon. Travis Hirschi, too, is an American criminologist who received his Ph.D. in sociology from UC Berkeley. He developed the Social Control Theory, which describes that the absence of social bonds and attachments to society can result in the increased likelihood of delinquency. In this theory, Gottfredson focused more on the societal controls on an individual. In 1990, Gottfredson and Travis Hirschi developed the theory of self-control, which focuses on the existence or the lack thereof self-control within an individual. Gottfredson and Hirschi make the switch from external control to those of internal causation. However, a relevancy does exist, for Hirschi believes that social controls can be used in explaining criminal behavior. Those controls have the competency to influence self-control, which according to Hirschi, is ingrained in an



Cited: Bernard, Thomas J, Jeffrey B. Snipes and Alexander L Gould. 2010. Vold 's Theoretical Criminology. New york, Oxford University Press. Cheung, Nicole W. T. and Yeut Cheung. 2007 "Self-control, Social Factors, and Delinquency: A Test of the General Theory of Crime Among Adolescents in Honk Kong." Journal of Youth and Adolescence 37(4):412-430. Retrieved from Ebsco on Nov 28, 2012 DeLisi, Matt and Michael G Vaughn. 2007 "Reconciling Self-control Theory, Criminal Careers and Career Criminals." International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology 52(5):520-537. Retrieved from Ebsco on Nov 28, 2012 Gottfredson, Michael R and Travis Hirschi. 1990. A General Theory of Crime. Stanford, Stanford University Press. McMullen, John C. 1999. A Test of Self-Control Theory Using General Patterns of Deviance. Blacksburg, VA. Schulz, Stefan . 2004 "Problems with the Versatility Construct of Gottfredson and Hirschi 's General Theory of Crime." European Journal of Crime, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice 12(1):61-82. Retrieved Simpson, Sally S. and Nicole Piquero. 2002 "Low Self-Control, Organizational Theory, and Corporate Crime." Law and Society Review 36(3):509-. Retrieved from Ebsco on Nov 28, 2012 from Ebsco on Nov 28, 2012 Welch, Kelly. 1998. Two Major Theories of Travis Hirschi. http://www.criminology.fsu.edu/crimtheory/hirschi.htm. Nov 28, 2012

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    The main focus of the self-control theory is that self-control accounts for a difference in the extent to which people are vulnerable to temptations. Gottfredson and Hirschi would view the individuals that did not give into temptation of criminal behavior as high self-control. The individuals that did give into temptations of criminal behavior were considered of low self-control. The individual with has low self control will always have a greater risk to give in to committing crime. The Labeling theory by Lemerts explained when people identify and behave in ways that reflect how others label and view them.…

    • 700 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Best Essays

    Nt1110 Unit 11 Lab

    • 2482 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Deng, X., & Zhang, L. (1998). Correlates of self-control: An empirical test of self-control theory. Journal of Crime and Justice, 21(2), 89-110.…

    • 2482 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hirschi's Control Theory

    • 866 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The thoughts and ideas of this theory were put together in ‘A General theory of crime’ (Michael Gotfredson and Travis Hirschi 1990). This theory is more of a refined control theory than originally presented over 20 years earlier by Hirschi. Within this theory it is stated that crime was claimed to have flowed from low self control. ‘It can be enjoyable because it involves the exercise of agility, deception or power, and it also requires a lack of sympathy for the victim’. But it does not provide long or medium term benefits. In short, it is, they say, likely to be committed by those who are ‘impulsive, insensitive, physical, risk taking, short sighted and non verbal’ (1990:90). Gottfredson and Hirschi argued that the types of people that who become involved in crime also engage in such behaviours that provide ‘short term gratification’…

    • 866 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Theories of Crime

    • 1359 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The social control theory does not ask the question “what makes people to commit a crime?” It bases its belief on the assumption that people are thought from a very young age between right and wrong. Social interaction is the key for the theory; humans are thought since birth the rules of society. Parents at home, and teachers in schools, are both the primary tutors of the upbringing of social behavior. According to Williams & McShane (2010), “Theories of social control all rely on social factors to explain how people are restrained from acting in ways harmful to others.” The strengths behind this theory is that social behavior is an immense factor when dealing with criminal behavior. If parents did not teach their children that taking candy from a store without paying was bad, then can we really blame that child for taking the candy? But on the other hand we do have those parents that carved good morals, and taught their kids right from wrong, but the children still committed criminal acts. This theory does have a lot of weight on criminal behavior because without proper socialization individuals are more prone to be confused about what is right and…

    • 1359 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Functionalism is a consensus structuralist theory, which sees the source of crime and deviance located in the structure of society. Although crime and deviance might be stigmatised in society, some sociologist think it is important to have it occur and there are some benefits to it.…

    • 1436 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Scholars have supported classical theory as the best descriptive model of crime. This paper makes a comparison to different theories of crime in comparison with the classical theory of crime with intent to arrive at a position in support or against the stance of these other scholars, that classical theory is the best descriptive model of crime.…

    • 1919 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The aim of this essay is to compare, contrast and evaluate two sociological theories of crime causation and two psychological theories of crime causation.…

    • 1985 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Criminal Theories

    • 2780 Words
    • 10 Pages

    P3 – Describe two theories of criminal behaviour and the factors that contribute to them…

    • 2780 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Control Theory

    • 15254 Words
    • 62 Pages

    ravis Hirschi has dominated control theory for four decades. His influence today is undiminished and likely will continue for years, if not decades, to come (see, e.g., Britt & Gottfredson, 2003; Gottfredson, 2006; Kempf, 1993; Pratt & Cullen, 2000). Beyond the sheer scholarly talent manifested in his writings, what accounts for Hirschi’s enduring influence on criminological theory? Three interrelated considerations appear to nourish the appeal of his thinking. First, Hirschi’s theories are stated parsimoniously. This means that his theory’s core propositions are easily understood (e.g., the lack of social bonds or of self-control increases criminal involvement). Second, Hirschi is combative and thus controversial. He stakes out a theoretical position and then argues that alternative perspectives are wrong. Hirschi (1983) has long been antagonistic to attempts to integrate theories. Good theories, he believes, have assumptions and an internal consistency that make them incompatible with other approaches. Attempts to mix them together result in fuzzy conceptual frameworks and inhibit the growth of the individual theories. Third, because Hirschi’s theories are parsimoniously stated and make claims that other theories are wrong, they are ideal to test empirically. One (but not the only) reason that theories flourish is that they are able to provide scholars with opportunities to conduct research and gain publications—the very accomplishment that allows for tenure…

    • 15254 Words
    • 62 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Motives are believed to be the reason behind the action of people. Whether negative or positive, they are the cause of an individual’s action. Since motives help us better recognize why a person would do something, a lot of research has been committed to understanding the pattern of people or group of peoples motives. Knowledge of patterns is crucial to many aspects of human behavior but especially those relating to crime. Knowing a pattern helps one to predict, and hopefully help educate others on future crimes. The research of crime is so extensive that researchers have created not only theories but also various subculture theories of crime. Subculture theory of crime is a set of theories arguing that certain groups or subcultures in society have values and attitudes that are conducive to crime and violence. Subcultural theories of Cloward and Ohlin, Wolfgang and Feracuti, Elijah Anderson, and Walter Miller offer a great deal of insight on why different groups of people choose to engage in the crimes that they participate in.…

    • 952 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Social Controls

    • 2967 Words
    • 12 Pages

    This essay will thoroughly examine and evaluate the claim that it is social controls that prevent us from committing crimes by looking at different social control theories. Firstly we must determine what a social control theory consists of, according to Hopkins (2009) ‘social control theory is fundamentally derived from a conception of human nature that proposes that there are no natural limits on elementary human needs and desires. People will always want and seek further economic reward and it is thus not necessary to look for special motives for engaging in criminal activity. Human beings are born free to break the law and will only refrain from doing so under particular circumstances. It is these fundamental assumptions that form the basis of social control theories’ (Hopkins 2009, p.246). Therefore controls set in society are the reason humans do not commit crime, if these controls were to be removed humans would naturally due to their nature commit crime. This also shows that social control theories try and solve the question of ‘why do people not commit crime?’ rather than ‘what causes people to commit crime?’ The reason behind solving the first question rather than the second is because social control theorists believe committing crime is the default position of every human therefore the second question has already been solved.…

    • 2967 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Best Essays

    Theories are useful tools, which suggest the way things are and not the way things ought to be, we can use them to help us to understand the world around us. In terms of criminal and deviant behaviour the theories proposed in this subject area set out to try and give reason as to why an individual commits criminal or delinquent acts. In this essay I will be using biological, psychological and sociological explanations of criminality to suggest why individuals take part in criminal behaviours.…

    • 1629 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Crime is defined as a breach of rules or laws that have been set by the government. Society has been given a set of rules that everyone who believes in good morals, follow. A crime would be anyone who has broken these set of laws for personal reasons such as greed. As of 2006, the crime rate of Toronto was 1,000 per 100,000. This has as shown a decrease since 2002. Crime has become an entity that is a part of society, without it, society would not function correctly. In the study of sociology, crime can be explained in four theoretical perspectives; Functionalism, conflict, interactionism, and feminism.…

    • 286 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The question I chose to respond to is to explain the sociological theories of crime. I chose…

    • 563 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Strain Theories Of Crime

    • 257 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Individuals who experience these strains become upset, and they may turn to crime in an effort to cope. Crime may be a way to reduce or escape from strains. For example, individuals may steal the money they want or run away from the parents who abuse them. Crime may be used to seek revenge against the source of strain or related targets. For example, individuals may assault the peers who harass them. Crime also may be used to alleviate negative emotions; for example, individuals may engage in illicit drug use in an effort to make themselves feel better. Strain theories are among the dominant explanations of crime, and, as discussed in this research paper, certain strain theories have had a major impact on efforts to control crime.…

    • 257 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays

Related Topics