In “Building Baby from the Genes Up” Ronald M. Green discusses the ethics of modern genetics. The author states in the article that it is nearly certain that gene technology will be present in the future of humanity. Green begins the article by recounting the story of a couple that wanted to eliminate the high occurrence of breast cancer from their family. To do this, they decided that they would use genetic diagnosis to select only embryos without the gene that may predispose someone to breast cancer.…
Laws of confidentiality such as HIPAA and Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act (GINA) are laws that should be used to govern the use of genetic…
The author, Yann Joly, supports their argument against legislation to protect genetic rights with three main points. The first point that the article mentions is that genetic discrimination cannot be “accurately described as a widespread practice within the life-insurance industry.” The author supports this with the fact that the practice of genetic discrimination has been found only in the context of Huntington’s disease, this being discovered after more than twenty years of trying to document genetic discrimination. The author also argues that “separating genetic information from other types of health information in law could promote the erroneous belief that most genes are the sole causes of disease.” In the opinion of the author, this could promote the…
| Given a situation related to reproductive genetics, genetic research, or the human genome project, develop a set of legal and ethical guidelines, which can be applied to genetic issues for the conduct of medical practice and/or research.…
Australian Law Reform Commission and the Australian Health Ethics Committee ‘Protection of Human Genetic Information’ (2002) ALRC, Sydney…
According to the ethical lens inventory, my personal ethic perspective demonstrates how my reasoning skills and intuition are equally balanced to determine how to accomplish my duties while ensuring that people are treated equally. My ethical perspective indicates that I make responsible choices that I feel are good for everyone, being responsible is a great ethic to have. I believe that by being responsible show maturity. My core values autonomy and rationality, I like to ensure that individual rights are protected. I feel that everyone should be treated fairly at all times. When I am working in a team I like to make sure that each individual is treated the same, and that…
How much of genetic information can the parents or relatives access raises a concern that it might result in an excessive use of reprogenetics. Furthermore, if scientists allow DNA screening for parents to avoid passing genetic diseases to their children, that might lead to more designer babies. Human genetic engineering is new and current field that has its pros and cons. Therefore, we should be more concerned about setting up the limits of how much access the public and scientists can have on genetic information, and taking in consideration the ethical issues behind…
For example, her article questioned whether sequencing a newborn’s genome without their consent is ethical. Although Flowers wrestled with these questions, she decided to have her own genome sequenced, in order to better equip the advance practice nursing students she instructs. Flowers is sharing her experience with her students as they learn about the role of genomic technologies in their clinical practice.…
This report will examine the ethical conundrum of patient confidentiality vs. a doctor’s duty to warn a patient of a potential health risk (see Appendix one for scenario). Primarily, this report will argue that patient confidentiality cannot be overruled, as there is not adequate legal or ethical reasoning to do so and as such, Jane’s doctor should not inform her children of their potential mutated gene.…
I believe that the Eugenics program had many issues, both technical and ethical. The basis of the Eugenics program - that an individual’s life can be seen as “a burden” and not worth society’s resources - brings up multiple moral arguments. Who is the judge of whether a life is more valuable than another? Does this not give government workers and referrers the jurisdiction to play God? Inherently, this program had a multitude of factors that were not taken into account. One issue is the measurements used to quantify whether a person should have the right to reproduce or not. The qualifications were too unclear, and a range of reasons were used, from IQ tests, mental illness, handicaps, and even sexual promiscuity. Moreover, while the program was active, the state did not clarify who should make the final decisions. Unlike most states, in which medical professionals mainly acted as the final word, North Carolina allowed social workers, medical professionals, teachers, and even neighbors to have a say in who could possibly be sterilized. Many of these individuals reported unsuspecting…
Others question the effectiveness and benefits of genetic screening and wonder if the process would prompt undue emotional distress, distress for the safety of the fetus and also the issue of…
From a patient’s perspective, people tend to see genetic information as more definitive, in the sense that 'you cannot change your genes' and that 'genes tell all about your future.’ Such genetic determinism is an oversimplification and does not take into account the nature of biologic pathways. From a provider’s perspective, genomics presents challenges with respect to ethical and professional responsibilities, including the appropriate use of genomic information in the health care setting. I believe that there should be an identification of provider education programs that increase use of appropriate screening, counseling and evidence-based genetic tests. By increasing the effectiveness of genomic testing, it will help dissolve the negative association and further increase the proportion of people who are willing to receive genetic…
Ruth Chadwick, the author of “Drug Discovery Today: Therapeutic Strategies”, revealed her concerns for the personalized medicine movement, “The move towards personalized medicine may disadvantage some patients in some social contexts, by shifting the allocation of resources in the health care system. Risks also surround the increasing accumulation of health data that goes hand in hand with personalized medicine” (Chadwick 171). Chadwick refers to the collection of personal DNA test information, “accumulation of healthcare data” as a risk; however, with the increased informational knowledge brought in by personalized medicine testing, cancer or other incurable diseases could benefit from an increased database of information. The risks mentioned by Chadwick may elude to an ethical argument for the increased concerns as personalized medicine comes to mainstream healthcare. Ideally, the increase in genetic testing among individuals through the implementation of personalized medicine would bring in massive amounts of information regarding the precursors for diseases and cancer allowing medical attention to become more accurate.…
As research continues to uncover new disease-causing mutations, the prospect of stopping the transmission of heritable diseases increases. With the use of modern technology, expecting parents can now be prescreened in order to determine their carrier status for certain diseases. Parents who choose to use in vitro fertilization are able to choose embryos that are free of disease due to preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Additionally, parents can be provided with information on their unborn child with the use of prenatal genetic testing. Some individuals view modern genetic technology as eugenic; however, this biggest difference between eugenics now and eugenics during the 1900s is consent. Today individuals pursue genetic testing by choice and policies on ethics and consent prevent reoccurrences of the immoral endeavors within the field of…
For the benefit of having access to a full genetic screening, an ethical issue would arise as to whether the information about certain codes like predisposition to diseases would be helpful or harmful to a client. Similarly, screening for genetic abnormalities prenatally could lead to unsafe abortions if the child is abnormal or just a general anxiousness for their baby. While there are many benefits of genetic screening, the ethical dilemmas that accompany each one are…