Preview

The Pros And Cons Of Human Genetic Engineering

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
255 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Pros And Cons Of Human Genetic Engineering
Human genetic engineering is the process by which the human genome is being modified and manipulated in order to remove or select certain genes. Moreover, traits that are desirable can be selected, and preventing the genetic causes of diseases is possible. Human genetic engineering, as a new field, has raised a lot of questions and ethical issues. I argue about where we should put the limits for our genetic editing. Should we just use it to prevent harmful diseases or can we carry on with the modification and choosing the desirable traits of our future generations? Who decides? Who has the right to object? I will try my best to provide reasonable answers to those questions throughout my series of blogs, based on scientific articles that talk about its controversial and ethical aspects. …show more content…
How much of genetic information can the parents or relatives access raises a concern that it might result in an excessive use of reprogenetics. Furthermore, if scientists allow DNA screening for parents to avoid passing genetic diseases to their children, that might lead to more designer babies. Human genetic engineering is new and current field that has its pros and cons. Therefore, we should be more concerned about setting up the limits of how much access the public and scientists can have on genetic information, and taking in consideration the ethical issues behind
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Limiting Science: a Summary
    • 529 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Limiting Science: a Summary

    David Baltimore’s written work of Limiting Science: A Biologist’s Perspective discusses the controversy of research in molecular biology and its limitless freedom, disputing there should be freedom in which direction science heads, but the public should decide the pace at which it goes. Baltimore first begins his argument with the discussion of how molecular biology began. It was born from individual sciences where attempts at trying to solve the mysteries in these fields led to the realization that the answers lied in genetics. Advances in the field are what really are at the heart of this discussion though. The most critical one is the development of recombinant DNA where DNA can be multiplied for an indefinite period, but the potential of this process has scared some scientists, even Baltimore himself, about unforeseen events. This led to even more unsettling questions that inevitably hurt the field of genetics, which Baltimore goes on to explain that the dangers have been blown out of proportion. The most common subject that comes to discussion through these fears is genetic engineering. Baltimore delves into the two techniques for altering imperfect genes, and then raises two questions that normally pop up. Who gets to decide what genes get altered and how will they decide it will be done? For Baltimore this presents a dilemma of both ethics and morals and thus presents the real problem at heart. To clarify the argument against recombinant DNA research Baltimore presents to the reader similar arguments. After he gives us the danger of actively researching genetic engineering, Baltimore flips the coin and argues the danger of restricting it. His theory is that the criterion used to decide how science should be handled reflects a dominant principle of governing. This should not be allowed to control scientific advances nor should science be the servant to this ideology, mainly because of the repercussions on society it could…

    • 529 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Building Babies From The Genes Up Robert M Green Summary
    • 1239 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Building Babies From The Genes Up Robert M Green Summary

    While the two writers present a strong case for and against genetic modification in human beings respectively, Green’s argument is more persuasive than Hayes. Through evaluating rhetorical strategies, we may begin to see why Green is more persuasive. In Green’s essay, his main claim is that it is time that genetic modification in humans came to be accepted in society. Green evaluates the case of a British couple who were granted the permission to go ahead with the use of genetic technology in humans in this case the use of pre-implantation genetic diagnosis and in-vitro fertilization in selecting healthy embryos for implantation to eliminate breast cancer from family lines forever.…

    • 1239 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Genetically Modified Humans? No Thanks, By Ronald M. Hayes
    • 532 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Genetically Modified Humans? No Thanks, By Ronald M. Hayes

    In “Genetically Modified Humans? No Thanks,” the author Richard Hayes is responding to Ronald M. Green’s article on gene therapy. Hayes is a visiting scholar at the University of California at Berkeley and has a Ph.D. in Energy and Resources. He has also addressed the United Nations about banning human cloning worldwide. The author argues against using genetic therapy in human research because of the risk it provides for human rights. He believes that it will likely result in the escalation of social inequality. Hayes is wrong, but also right at the same time. He is right about how gene manipulation has the potential to cause some real harm, but is wrong about how people should never use genetic technologies.…

    • 532 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Jessica Erickson Genetic Engineering Debate
    • 129 Words
    • 1 Page

    Jessica Erickson Genetic Engineering Debate

    Genetic Engineering Debate: Are There Lines We Shouldn’t Cross? written by Jessica Erickson, shows that just because we can genetic engineer, doesn’t mean we should leave it unsupervised. Currently genetic engineering is available for plants, animals, and humans. Genetic engineering for plants and animals is quicker and less complex then doing it on humans. The next subject Erickson wrights about is the uses of genetic engineering. Erickson believes that genetic engineering could be good if it benefits diseases, prevent, and treatments, on the other hand Erickson believes genetic engineering could be bad if it is used for “designer babies”. Erickson believes that there should be a “Do not cross line”, which means that there should be government…

    • 129 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Genetic Modification Pros And Cons
    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Genetic Modification Pros And Cons

    Genetically modified foods are beneficial for our society because of the nutrients that may be added to foods and the greater ability to produce these foods. While some people argue that genetic modification is still a new technology that should be researched further, others will agree that the benefits definitely outweigh the drawbacks. Society today has all kinds of new technology at its fingertips and should be allowed to use this technology to enhance certain things to better the world.…

    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Pros And Cons Of Genetic Modification
    • 189 Words
    • 1 Page

    Pros And Cons Of Genetic Modification

    Genetic modification is becoming closer and closer to an everyday possibility. With this possibility comes a whirlwind of possible effects, both positive and negative. There has been a history of opposition towards these technologies, oftentimes because of fear that the capabilities would be abused. However, the potential that newborns could be born free of hereditary diseases outweighs the fear of “designer babies”.…

    • 189 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of Genetic Engineering
    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Pros And Cons Of Genetic Engineering

    Genetic engineering (GE) is also known, as genetic modification is the process of organisms that are genetically modified. In this process the goal is to transfer new DNA to an organism so it can improve its habits and make new cells.…

    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Genetic Engineering Pros And Cons
    • 418 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Genetic Engineering Pros And Cons

    Genetic engineering is the incorporation of a new gene into another organism's genome for a certain benefit which may include treatment of diseases, manufacturing of drugs,hormones etc., and production of foods.It started in early 1900's, but scientists at that time did not practice ethics but as time went by ethical issues were addressed with the evolution of International organizations such as the United Nations. lt has been beneficiary to our society especially in the food production industries in order to feed large numbers of people through Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO),even though there will still be issues of concern on the negative side effects of these products.…

    • 418 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Pros And Cons Of Genetic Engineering
    • 1069 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Pros And Cons Of Genetic Engineering

    Genetic engineering often gets a bad rap with changing the natural evolutionary cycle, but it could, with proper guidance, improve almost every aspect of daily life. Advances in the Biotech Revolution have made many things that we had merely considered to be science fiction or a thing of dreams are now possible.The fact of the matter is that genetic engineering is applicable to everyday life while still being ethical and inline with people’s morals.…

    • 1069 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Why Is Genetic Engineering Bad
    • 973 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Why Is Genetic Engineering Bad

    The argument between whether genetic engineering is wrong or right rages on every day, and will continue to be an issue until everybody can come to an agreement on what can and can’t be done. Mary Shelley, the author of Frankenstein, writes about how she feels and questions the progression of modern science and how far we can go until it is just morally and ethically wrong. Through the mind of a young scientist, Mary pictures the possibility of what could happen if we venture too far into the unknown and how could it harm everyone. Knowing the line between continuing and finding things that can help society and knowing when to stop is essential to stop something from happening just like in the novel Frankenstein. Not only that, but many people argue over the fact that modifying the human body is wrong and go against the will of many different…

    • 973 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Argumentative Essay On Eugenics
    • 585 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Argumentative Essay On Eugenics

    As research continues to uncover new disease-causing mutations, the prospect of stopping the transmission of heritable diseases increases. With the use of modern technology, expecting parents can now be prescreened in order to determine their carrier status for certain diseases. Parents who choose to use in vitro fertilization are able to choose embryos that are free of disease due to preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Additionally, parents can be provided with information on their unborn child with the use of prenatal genetic testing. Some individuals view modern genetic technology as eugenic; however, this biggest difference between eugenics now and eugenics during the 1900s is consent. Today individuals pursue genetic testing by choice and policies on ethics and consent prevent reoccurrences of the immoral endeavors within the field of…

    • 585 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Pros and Cons of Genetic Engineering
    • 528 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Pros and Cons of Genetic Engineering

    The most prominent and perhaps the most acceptable reason given for genetic engineering is its potential use in preventative medicine. A few cells from an embryo could be genetically analyzed to detect harmful mutation or predisposition towards disorder, at which point action could be taken either through somatic cell or germ-line gene modification. In 1993, the gene that causes Huntington's Disease was located, and scientists are currently trying to determine its normal function (The Benefits of Genetic Engineering). Assuming researchers succeed in this endeavor, genetic engineering could then be used to eliminate a debilitating and ultimately fatal disease that affects approximately 30000 Americans and that has the potential to affect 150000 more through genetic inheritance (Huntington's Disease). In 1997, a group of scientists successfully diagnosed familial adenomatous polyposis coli, the dominant cancer predisposition syndrome, in three preimplantation embryos. This type of cancer predisposition affects 1 in every 10000 people America, Britain, and Japan, making it a relatively common malady (Ao, 140). Schizophrenia has been shown to run in families; even adopted children of schizophrenic parents are ten times more likely to develop schizophrenia, regardless of whether or not their adoptive parents are affected (Bernstein, 518). Lastly, birth defects such as downs syndrome could be eliminated through genetic engineering (Resta).…

    • 528 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Genetic Screening Persuasive Essay
    • 286 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Genetic Screening Persuasive Essay

    For the benefit of having access to a full genetic screening, an ethical issue would arise as to whether the information about certain codes like predisposition to diseases would be helpful or harmful to a client. Similarly, screening for genetic abnormalities prenatally could lead to unsafe abortions if the child is abnormal or just a general anxiousness for their baby. While there are many benefits of genetic screening, the ethical dilemmas that accompany each one are…

    • 286 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Pros And Cons Of Genetic Engineering
    • 551 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Pros And Cons Of Genetic Engineering

    1. Defeating fatal diseases. Genetic enhancement can make our genes resistant to diseases that can be contracted. There is potential to completely cure the diseases that have currently don not have a known cure such as Cystic Fibrosis by creating a gene to fight it or taking the gene that causes the disease out entirely. 2.…

    • 551 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Genetic Engineering Persuasive Essay Final
    • 1123 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Genetic Engineering Persuasive Essay Final

    Visualize a world where anyone can do anything, regardless of age or physical conditions. Nobody would age nor develop any illnesses or disorders. Essentially, this would be a society in which everyone is perfect. Such a thought would be the result of genetic engineering, which is the modification of an organism’s genome using biotechnology. Scientists alter the genetic makeup of an organism by using techniques that remove inherited material or inject DNA from outside the organism either directly into the host or into a cell that is then crossbred with the host (Clapper, 2013). The goal of genetically modifying organisms is to fix imperfections and improve their capabilities. In humans, genes that cause diseases and disorders can be identified and defenses can be put up to fight them. After hours of research and weeks of studying on the topic, I have reached a conclusion that humans should be able to be genetically engineered, but there needs to be a limit to how much they are modified. Some benefits of this include the absence of diseases, the ability for parents to choose the physical traits for their child, and increased human capabilities.…

    • 1123 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More

Related Topics