Preview

Why Is Genetic Engineering Bad

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
973 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why Is Genetic Engineering Bad
Genetic Engineering: The Good and The Bad The argument between whether genetic engineering is wrong or right rages on every day, and will continue to be an issue until everybody can come to an agreement on what can and can’t be done. Mary Shelley, the author of Frankenstein, writes about how she feels and questions the progression of modern science and how far we can go until it is just morally and ethically wrong. Through the mind of a young scientist, Mary pictures the possibility of what could happen if we venture too far into the unknown and how could it harm everyone. Knowing the line between continuing and finding things that can help society and knowing when to stop is essential to stop something from happening just like in the novel Frankenstein. Not only that, but many people argue over the fact that modifying the human body is wrong and go against the will of many different …show more content…

Even though genetic engineering can have bad affects, there are many false health alarms about it also. It’s even claimed by others that these are just false health alarms, “…so many other public health false alarms, the attack on the new biotechnology – also known as bioengineering, gene splicing, or genetic engineering” (Miller and Conko, 22). This can be related to Frankenstein and how if Victor took more time to examine and study the notes he had gotten more thoroughly, he could have reduced the risks and nullified the worries about genetic engineering. Genetic engineering can be used for good if tested enough to get rid of unwanted symptoms like ADHD and other undesirable symptoms. Parents would love to have a world without ADHD and it could happen if they tried things with genetic engineering, just as Michael Lemonick from Time Magazine says, “What if parents can use pre-implantation genetic diagnosis to avoid having kids with attention-deficit

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    David Baltimore’s written work of Limiting Science: A Biologist’s Perspective discusses the controversy of research in molecular biology and its limitless freedom, disputing there should be freedom in which direction science heads, but the public should decide the pace at which it goes. Baltimore first begins his argument with the discussion of how molecular biology began. It was born from individual sciences where attempts at trying to solve the mysteries in these fields led to the realization that the answers lied in genetics. Advances in the field are what really are at the heart of this discussion though. The most critical one is the development of recombinant DNA where DNA can be multiplied for an indefinite period, but the potential of this process has scared some scientists, even Baltimore himself, about unforeseen events. This led to even more unsettling questions that inevitably hurt the field of genetics, which Baltimore goes on to explain that the dangers have been blown out of proportion. The most common subject that comes to discussion through these fears is genetic engineering. Baltimore delves into the two techniques for altering imperfect genes, and then raises two questions that normally pop up. Who gets to decide what genes get altered and how will they decide it will be done? For Baltimore this presents a dilemma of both ethics and morals and thus presents the real problem at heart. To clarify the argument against recombinant DNA research Baltimore presents to the reader similar arguments. After he gives us the danger of actively researching genetic engineering, Baltimore flips the coin and argues the danger of restricting it. His theory is that the criterion used to decide how science should be handled reflects a dominant principle of governing. This should not be allowed to control scientific advances nor should science be the servant to this ideology, mainly because of the repercussions on society it could…

    • 529 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In “Genetically Modified Humans? No Thanks,” the author Richard Hayes is responding to Ronald M. Green’s article on gene therapy. Hayes is a visiting scholar at the University of California at Berkeley and has a Ph.D. in Energy and Resources. He has also addressed the United Nations about banning human cloning worldwide. The author argues against using genetic therapy in human research because of the risk it provides for human rights. He believes that it will likely result in the escalation of social inequality. Hayes is wrong, but also right at the same time. He is right about how gene manipulation has the potential to cause some real harm, but is wrong about how people should never use genetic technologies.…

    • 532 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Genetic Engineering Debate: Are There Lines We Shouldn’t Cross? written by Jessica Erickson, shows that just because we can genetic engineer, doesn’t mean we should leave it unsupervised. Currently genetic engineering is available for plants, animals, and humans. Genetic engineering for plants and animals is quicker and less complex then doing it on humans. The next subject Erickson wrights about is the uses of genetic engineering. Erickson believes that genetic engineering could be good if it benefits diseases, prevent, and treatments, on the other hand Erickson believes genetic engineering could be bad if it is used for “designer babies”. Erickson believes that there should be a “Do not cross line”, which means that there should be government…

    • 129 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Leon Kass, a medical researcher at Harvard University has said that “Cloning represents a very clear, powerful, and immediate example in which we are in danger of turning procreation into manufacture.” While what he says about cloning becoming an imminent problem may not be necessarily true Mary Shelley, the author of “Frankenstein”, and Lewis Thomas, author of “On Cloning a Human Being”, have similar stances on the negative effect synthetic creation of human life would have on the world. In Frankenstein Victor, a man raised around learning in the early 1800’s gained an interest in natural sciences after being exposed to it by one of his professors. He soon delves into the art of galvanism which eventually leads to the creation of his monster. Disturbed by his creature’s appearance Victor ditches him to fend for himself.…

    • 1055 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Human genetic engineering is the process by which the human genome is being modified and manipulated in order to remove or select certain genes. Moreover, traits that are desirable can be selected, and preventing the genetic causes of diseases is possible. Human genetic engineering, as a new field, has raised a lot of questions and ethical issues. I argue about where we should put the limits for our genetic editing. Should we just use it to prevent harmful diseases or can we carry on with the modification and choosing the desirable traits of our future generations? Who decides? Who has the right to object? I will try my best to provide reasonable answers to those questions throughout my series of blogs, based on scientific articles that talk about its controversial and ethical aspects.…

    • 255 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Genetic engineering (GE) is also known, as genetic modification is the process of organisms that are genetically modified. In this process the goal is to transfer new DNA to an organism so it can improve its habits and make new cells.…

    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    English 112 Essay

    • 1670 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In this essay, to support my standpoint, I will be using work from Rebecca Dresser, who wrote, "Genetic Modification of Preimplantation Embryos: Toward Adequate Human Research Policies." Rebecca Dresser describes current shortcomings and recommends policy actions are designed to ensure, that they must meet certain criteria for research on human modification being practiced. In addition, author, Sally Deneen's article entitled Designer People. Where she asks, Are We Changing the Nature of Nature? Richard Hayes, Genetically Modified Humans? No Thanks, the opposing viewpoint to Ronald M. Green. In addition, to the Bible and other scholars, who also feel that, human genetic modification, is unethical.…

    • 1670 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Determining what is ethical and what is not ethical can rely heavily on possible consequences. The author of “Frankenstein” displays this in the novel. The novel “Frankenstein” is about a how a man named Victor Frankenstein discovers the secret of bringing life into an inanimate object, by robbing body parts and creating a monster. This monster seeks revenge on his creator, as well as the society because society rejected him. The main part of this essay is to compare a real world bioethical issue to the events of “Frankenstein”. The novel has a direct relationship with real world cloning because many see this as a wrong in the human society, both in the book and in the real world.…

    • 795 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In the novel Frankenstein, author Mary Shelley suggests that when science is not used responsibly by man, it can become out of control. Mary Shelley warns readers of the dangers that come with the advancement of technology and the potential risks that emerge when science is raised godlike standards. Today, science and technology are advancing much more rapidly than is our wisdom to use them properly. Due to this, science and technology are becoming the equivalent of modern day ‘monsters’. Reproductive cloning on humans is a prominent scientific and technological advancement that poses issues regarding human control and manipulation over the natural world and morality. With these advancements come risks. The main risk being that reproductive…

    • 1748 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The risk is that it could complicate many things with curing disease, but on the flip side of it, it could be very useful for those who are prone to diseases. This was a paraphrase of the writing of Danielle Simmons. Genetic engineering can present both a great boon and possible danger to the human race. Many diseases that come around when people are adults ar incurable. This is a problem but none the less can help people deal with it it they learn about it earlier. Though this may not have as much to do with Genetic Engineering but it has a very important physiological values. Another paraphrase of Danielle Simmons helping to explain the fact of adult onset…

    • 1069 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A question one could ask oneself is, whether or not Frankenstein is God? Does he have the right to create or undo life? Questions and fears are countless in this matter, but so are the curiosities which continue to carry on the development of biotechnological science. There were many factors which drove Frankenstein on in his venture through creating life, one being curiosity. It is curiosity among other factors which drive scientists on in this subject even today, although oppositions from numerous other scientists.…

    • 650 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Technology has improved rapidly over the past millennium, however there is still a lot to be learned, in terms of the long term effects of such ”Promethean powers”. Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein is a perfect example of how much can wrong in such little time if scientists refuse to take ethical and moral responsibilities for their own creations. Many practices such as gene manipulation and cloning are being done even without adequate scientific knowledge of their impacts on the human race and the environment. Society is being turned blind to the thought of these types of technology which they believe will be beneficial in the long run. Instead they are proving to cause more harm than good, and scientists are refusing to take proper actions and responsibilities against these types of technologies. Scientists nowadays are refusing to eat their own genetically modified organisms, out of fear that will get cancer and other illnesses. These same scientists are still working for the same companies who produce genetically modified organisms for all the people to buy and eat. It just goes to show that nowadays it is all about corporate profit rather than the good of the people. Corporate profit is being chosen at the expense of human health and well being, and since the creation of these organisms are so complex, the fingers…

    • 1767 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Eighty-five years ago, the publication of the novel Brave New World by Aldous Huxley changed the perspective of Americans towards genetic engineering. “Genetic engineering is the deliberate modification of the characteristics of an organism by manipulating its genetic material” (Michaels 1). In this novel, there is an abundant misapplication of genetic engineering to control society. The practice of genetic engineering in Huxley’s world is extremely dangerous as it denies social order, diminishes individual freedom and enhances government supremacy within the society which is manifested in modern civilization as well.…

    • 989 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although scientists and other supporters paint a pretty picture of how ideal our lives would be with so many genetic choices within reach, genetic engineering undermines rather than enhances the promise of humanity because we fail to see the big picture of the responsibilities and consequences of possessing such a God-like ability.…

    • 588 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Genes are what code particular traits and characteristics and are the influence to health and disease. Ongoing advances are now making it available for parents to genetically modify implanted embryos aiding in the creation of ‘designer babies’. In my essay I am going to discuss the case of a British couple that will have Britain’s first designer baby. I will cover the ethical issues regarding the topic of genetic engineering and also theories of Kantian Ethics and Utilitarianism to justify if genetic engineering is morally right.…

    • 1816 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays