Preview

Building Babies From The Genes Up Robert M Green Summary

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1239 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Building Babies From The Genes Up Robert M Green Summary
Say “Yes” to Genetic Human Modification
In the field of science, there have been numerous studies on the use of gene technology in humans. This has pitted two sides against one another with those opposed to and those supporting the same. Among the authors on this issue include Robert M. Green with his essay on “Building babies from the Genes up” and Richard Hayes with his essay “Genetically modified humans? No thanks”. While the two writers present a strong case for and against genetic modification in human beings respectively, Green’s argument is more persuasive than Hayes. Through evaluating rhetorical strategies, we may begin to see why Green is more persuasive.
In Green’s essay, his main claim is that it is time that genetic modification in humans came to be accepted in society. Green evaluates the case of a British couple who were granted the permission to go ahead with the use of genetic technology in humans in this case the use of pre-implantation genetic diagnosis and in-vitro fertilization in selecting healthy embryos for implantation to eliminate breast cancer from family lines forever. To Green, knowledge is power thus the technology to evaluate genes and work around the same is a chance
…show more content…
Instead of a normal opening, the reader is indulged in a personal story which plays the role of the introduction. Such an informal introduction is key in capturing the reader’s attention to the events surrounding the essay. After the opening, Green then dives into the evaluation of the essay where he puts across his points for supporting the use of genes technology. Green effectively does the same through concession and through counterarguments. After presenting his points in a chronological manner, Green ends his essay with a strong conclusion that gene technology can be incorporated into humans. Thus, the arrangement of the essay helps in making his arguments stronger (Barnet & Bedau,

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    In “Building Baby from the Genes Up” Ronald M. Green discusses the ethics of modern genetics. The author states in the article that it is nearly certain that gene technology will be present in the future of humanity. Green begins the article by recounting the story of a couple that wanted to eliminate the high occurrence of breast cancer from their family. To do this, they decided that they would use genetic diagnosis to select only embryos without the gene that may predispose someone to breast cancer.…

    • 312 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Brendan Koerner’s “Embryo Police” describes the possible future of genetically altering embryos. He tells us how in the near future it is perfectly possible for us to be able to pick and choose what traits our future children will have with technology such as in vitro fertilization (IVF). Throughout his article he often makes the reader unknowingly decided whether this is a good or bad piece of technology and whether or not we should be meddling in nature’s way. There are a multitude of variables that are to be considered when examining the morals of this technology. Koerner tells us a true story, in which the family by the name of the Mastersons, suffers the tragic loss of their 3-year-old daughter to a fire at the family’s…

    • 1533 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Executive director of the Center for Genetics and Society, Richard Hayes in the article “Genetically Modified Humans? No Thanks”, published in the Washington Post address the topic of science’s developing world of selective genes and rebuttals the promotion of parent selective genes.…

    • 238 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    science of genetic manipulation. The article is written by Dr. Ronald Green who strongly takes…

    • 529 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In “Genetically Modified Humans? No Thanks,” the author Richard Hayes is responding to Ronald M. Green’s article on gene therapy. Hayes is a visiting scholar at the University of California at Berkeley and has a Ph.D. in Energy and Resources. He has also addressed the United Nations about banning human cloning worldwide. The author argues against using genetic therapy in human research because of the risk it provides for human rights. He believes that it will likely result in the escalation of social inequality. Hayes is wrong, but also right at the same time. He is right about how gene manipulation has the potential to cause some real harm, but is wrong about how people should never use genetic technologies.…

    • 532 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    To show the benefits genetic modification could have, Green describes couples wanting to get rid of cancer in their family's genetics in the…

    • 305 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Genetic modification is becoming closer and closer to an everyday possibility. With this possibility comes a whirlwind of possible effects, both positive and negative. There has been a history of opposition towards these technologies, oftentimes because of fear that the capabilities would be abused. However, the potential that newborns could be born free of hereditary diseases outweighs the fear of “designer babies”.…

    • 189 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Human genetic engineering is the process by which the human genome is being modified and manipulated in order to remove or select certain genes. Moreover, traits that are desirable can be selected, and preventing the genetic causes of diseases is possible. Human genetic engineering, as a new field, has raised a lot of questions and ethical issues. I argue about where we should put the limits for our genetic editing. Should we just use it to prevent harmful diseases or can we carry on with the modification and choosing the desirable traits of our future generations? Who decides? Who has the right to object? I will try my best to provide reasonable answers to those questions throughout my series of blogs, based on scientific articles that talk about its controversial and ethical aspects.…

    • 255 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    English 112 Essay

    • 1670 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In this essay, to support my standpoint, I will be using work from Rebecca Dresser, who wrote, "Genetic Modification of Preimplantation Embryos: Toward Adequate Human Research Policies." Rebecca Dresser describes current shortcomings and recommends policy actions are designed to ensure, that they must meet certain criteria for research on human modification being practiced. In addition, author, Sally Deneen's article entitled Designer People. Where she asks, Are We Changing the Nature of Nature? Richard Hayes, Genetically Modified Humans? No Thanks, the opposing viewpoint to Ronald M. Green. In addition, to the Bible and other scholars, who also feel that, human genetic modification, is unethical.…

    • 1670 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The argument between whether genetic engineering is wrong or right rages on every day, and will continue to be an issue until everybody can come to an agreement on what can and can’t be done. Mary Shelley, the author of Frankenstein, writes about how she feels and questions the progression of modern science and how far we can go until it is just morally and ethically wrong. Through the mind of a young scientist, Mary pictures the possibility of what could happen if we venture too far into the unknown and how could it harm everyone. Knowing the line between continuing and finding things that can help society and knowing when to stop is essential to stop something from happening just like in the novel Frankenstein. Not only that, but many people argue over the fact that modifying the human body is wrong and go against the will of many different…

    • 973 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Designer Babies

    • 763 Words
    • 4 Pages

    My position on the topic is one of disagreement towards genetic engineering for purely ethical reasons. However, in a purely scientific aspect is an extremely advanced procedure that could open many more opportunities in either the near of distant future. Due to these reasons, I remain impartial on the subject.…

    • 763 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Ethics of Designer Babies

    • 1925 Words
    • 8 Pages

    • Peterson, James C. Genetic Turning Points: the Ethics of Human Genetic Intervention. Grand Rapids, MI: W.B. Eerdmans Pub., 2001. Princeton…

    • 1925 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In this essay, the ethical analysis applied to debate human genetic engineering is the Utilitarianism theory. The Utilitarian method seeks to maximize the utility of an act or a rule while minimizing the pain that could possibly be caused. Utilitarian principles are the foundation of many US policies, especially those that deal with economics and trade (1, P4, Williams, 1999). Utility is very tightly linked to efficiency and productivity, and maximum efficiency classically concurs with maximum utility. However, a Utilitarian argument can seem imperfect when dealing with concerns of justice and personal rights, which is the case with…

    • 1595 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    The concept of genetically modifying human beings is one that is hotly debated in several spheres of thought. Likewise, there are many ways people look at it, and many conclusions people come to. As our technological advances makes modification of human babies more and more feasible, the ethics of the process comes under more and more scrutiny. The obvious benefits of manipulating the genome of a future baby is that parents with genetic disorders have a way to ensure that the child is healthy.…

    • 1031 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hereditarily screening our posterity to improve individuals is simply dependable child rearing and an ethical commitment. As guardians we need our children to experience their fullest capacities. Genetically altering babies could be viewed as an "ethical commitment" as it makes them grow up into "morally better kids", this in light of a couple of hereditary connections to 'identity issue. Genetically modifying individuals can help improve the quality of life and overall make up the society by allowing parents to choose the DNA makeup of their offspring.…

    • 760 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays