Preview

Summary Of Embryo Police By Brendan Koerner

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1533 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Summary Of Embryo Police By Brendan Koerner
Brendan Koerner’s “Embryo Police” describes the possible future of genetically altering embryos. He tells us how in the near future it is perfectly possible for us to be able to pick and choose what traits our future children will have with technology such as in vitro fertilization (IVF). Throughout his article he often makes the reader unknowingly decided whether this is a good or bad piece of technology and whether or not we should be meddling in nature’s way. There are a multitude of variables that are to be considered when examining the morals of this technology. Koerner tells us a true story, in which the family by the name of the Mastersons, suffers the tragic loss of their 3-year-old daughter to a fire at the family’s Monifieth. …show more content…
To allow the Mastertons to simply pick their child’s gender would have been nice but I believe that we would have to look at the bigger picture here. Yes, the Mastertons suffered a tragic event but to allow them to genetically choose their child would cause some discontent with some people. While the ethically good thing to do would be to allow them to choose their baby’s gender. The ethical thing is not always the right thing if it means putting our future and species at risk. Koerner tells us of a man whose name Nazir- Ali who states that “There's a fear that sex selection for social purposes will discriminate against women. There is also the fear that a child may be treated as a means to an end, rather than an end in itself, particularly if that child is seen as replacing a child who died in tragic circumstances. It's a heavy burden to bear if you're there as a replacement, not for your own sake. (Koerner 2012)”. Nature has a specific way of laying things out and fate or destiny will have its way one way or another. To allow scientists and researchers to meddle in the affairs of what is one the most intimate and natural processes of life seems unimaginable and could put mankind in a place that would be irredeemable. Can we justify …show more content…
We run into the problem of money and power when it comes to genetically altering babies. Of course we want to believe that we would do it for the mere health aspect of our children but there are people that would take advantage of this advancement. This is where the restrictions are applied and the reason why this advancement has not taken off as fast as one would think. People are mostly competitive by nature. We compete for everything from love to prizes to recognition and we strive to be the best whether you know it or not. So naturally we want our kids to be the best at what they do. We want our kids to achieve the highest honor roll and win every award, right? So what’s to stop someone from taking these genetic advancements and working them to their advantage? That mom wants to give her kid an amazing athletic ability and increase his or her intelligence to push their IQ score off the charts and now with these genetic advancements what’s stopping her besides money. Before you know it there is an even more defined social and wealth distinction between the rich and the poor. We are then really created a new class of humans. Professor Silver of Princeton says it best in his book Remaking Eden: How Genetic Engineering and Cloning Will Transform the American Family. Silver tells us of a world where a new class of people, GenRich, rule everything while a more

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Research offers advancements in technology that takes ethics to a new level and can be seen as bothersome by some. Legality issues even arise from such dilemma’s, as in the case of the Capato’s, where the Supreme Court “struggled to align modern reproductive techniques to a federal law written in 1939” (Barnes, R. 2012).…

    • 939 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Today, as a result of developing new technologies, parents can know the gender of their unborn baby and also can chose the child’s gender before to be implanted in the womb. Technologies as Vitro fertilization and testing the embryos for abnormalities are the most controversial movement for reproductive freedom in our days. Using Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis for non-medical purposes can be a violation of ethical and moral practices.…

    • 547 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The future of genetic engineering is full of many possibilities, good things and improvements for our society. Currently, designer baby technology is only used to make sure the parents of a future child will not have a child with an incurable disease. However, it is only a matter of time before a doctor or company will put a price on other aspects of the genome of the baby. The technology can even be dangerous right now as it is to the embryos.…

    • 1104 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The main thesis of the Chapter is the ethical, moral, and political concerns regarding experimentation on human embryos. In the chapter, Philosopher Bonnie Steinbeck argues that embryos have a moral value, but do not possess a moral status. In her argument, moral value is when good reasons can be used to justify a being’s existence rather than objectifying it, and moral status is a being’s ability to have its own interests. For example, the ability for a being to feel pain. One would assume that a being would chose to not endure undue pain and seek to avoid it. Since embryos are not yet sentient, they cannot feel pain. In the late 1900’s Congress refused to authorize legislation for embryonic experimentation, even when the Ethics Advisory Board…

    • 719 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This means that parents would be able to design their child to only have chosen traits. This creates a conscious opportunity to advance human capability, while raising endless moral and ethical questions. Just because we can, should we? As with all technology advances, the advanced genetic technology of designer babies comes with advantages and disadvantages. It’s up to the reader’s experience, worldview, and values to decide if the benefits outweigh the concerns.…

    • 929 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Modern technologies are constantly advancing in a multitude of ways to the degree that scientists have gained enough knowledgeable about the human genome to be able to find specific genes during the embryonic stage of reproduction. Scientists have already begun to use this knowledge to allow parents the ability to select the sex of their child and screen for genetic diseases via preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) with in vitro fertilization (IVF). Sex-selection has already created world-wide discussion regarding the ethics of such a situation. However, scientists are now looking toward germline engineering which will essentially allow parents to select and alter genetic traits of their children before implantation of the embryo into the female body. John Alan Cohan’s article, “Ethics of Genetic Enhancement” and Marcy Darnovsky’s “The Case Against Designer Babies: The Politics of Genetic Enhancement” disagree in their investigations of the ethicality of germline engineering to potentially “design” our future children to be more capable in every aspect.…

    • 1931 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    When focusing on the sex-selected offspring growing into an adult and developmental concerns, they face psychological harm. Psychological egoism fuels many decisions to proceed with gender selection. The parent's believe their life will be better by having a certain gender offspring. This selfish view is motivated by their wants and desires. They are discriminating against an unborn child because of their own preconceived notions as to what the perfect offspring would be for them. The decision may cause regret in the future. Years after a couple has their child of chosen gender, certain instances may make them question if they should have chosen differently. If there is no choice made and the child is conceived naturally, there cannot be any regrets. Research has suggested that there have been cases of gender identity problems following gender selection, which stems back to the biological factor and development within the womb. This may cause animosity towards their parents and unnecessary psychological problems in their lifetime. The US Center for Genetics and Society points out that it does not consider what is best for the child: "Parental determination of a child’s sex could adversely influence the child’s interpersonal development, socialization process, and core identity."…

    • 1446 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In response, it has been argued that germline genetic alterations are unlike classical eugenics, in that they eliminate defective genes rather than human beings (12), and that multifactorial traits like intelligence or attractiveness may never prove amenable to manipulation. More importantly, the eugenics argument presupposes a slippery slope, however, morally-relevant lines can be drawn to delineate acceptable versus unethical applications of the technology (16). To this end, Berger and Gert (6) define the term “malady” as a physical disorder which provides a direct challenge to the fundamental principles of benevolence and nonmaleficence, by imposing the universally-accepted evils of death, pain, or disability, precluding the freedom and pleasure available in life to the vast majority of other human beings. Relief of morbidity and mortality fall within the acceptable line, changing sex or increasing otherwise normal intelligence or height — decisions not based on medical need — would lie outside. Thus, the ethical line should be drawn to make therapy acceptable and enhancement unacceptable, rather than the current state permitting somatic manipulations but disallowing germline experiments (16). Informed consent becomes a special problem with germline gene therapy, because it is impossible to obtain the…

    • 4484 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    People who agree with designer babies say that it is going to give the kids a big head start in life, as they are going to look better and are going to be really smart. Personally I think that these people need to grow a heart and have some respect for people. If someone has the confidence to go out and apply for a job they should have the exact same opportunities as a genetically modified…

    • 536 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    If doctors want a sure guarantee that all of the cells of that person will contain this new gene as they grow and develop, they have to implement the change as early as the single celled zygote or even the parental gametes. By making these changes so early on in a person’s life, there is no way that it is that person’s choice about the change. The phrase “competent people” comes up again. At a stage where there is very little activity, there is no way the child would have any say in the matter. This is another argument that Alarmists have against genetic…

    • 1410 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Eugenics

    • 1122 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The moral values that societies set in place in order to maintain the most efficient means of interaction among its people are essential in the prosperity and manageability of the population. Ideas that challenge or denounce these values put the well-being of society at risk. The theological aspects of eugenics contradict the basis of ethical standards in the United States. Due to its concern with competitive fertility, this method of genetic engineering can be argued as the antithesis of reproductive freedom. Competitive fertility introduces the method of sterilization, which is the act of making an individual infertile. Although it is unfavorable by over half of the geneticists in the United States, countries such as China and India have come close to requiring mandatory sterilization by law. (Wertz 503) The fact that this concept has the ability to inspire such favorability of an act that revokes the reproductive rights of those deemed “unfit” to reproduce is baffling. How can a human being feel content in supporting a cause that holds such immoral notions? Granting scientific judgment the power to label individuals genetically fit or unfit is allowing them to cross the…

    • 1122 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pro Choice Debate

    • 419 Words
    • 2 Pages

    What about in cases of rape through incest? Should the child bare ridicule for the rest of its life for being a by-product of incestial rape? Children born from incest also have an extremely high rate of severe medical abnormalities and a high mortality rate in general. It’s inadvisable to force something to be born given the severe drawbacks.…

    • 419 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Build A Baby

    • 1083 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The debate on genetically modifying humans has been on the rise for many years in numerous countries. Richard Hayes writes a rebuttal article titled “Genetically Modified Humans? No Thanks” discussing why he disagrees with modifying human genes and all of the horrors it entails. Although he speaks lightly of science using this method to cure diseases, he knows society will take it many steps too far. He asserts that “theses same technologies also have the potential for real harm” (500). He envisions society becoming too obsessed with the idea, and abusing the technology. He questions, “Once we begin genetically modifying our children, where do we stop?” (500). This is quite a terrifying point of view. Will we be supporting a future of artificial children who have no differences from others and no say in their life course? Also, he dives into looking at the issue from an international perspective. He states, “In a world still barely able to contain the forces of nationalism, ethnocentrism, and militarism, the last thing we need to worry about is a high-tech eugenic arms race” (500). The rise of this invention has the possibility of creating even more tension among countries on top of the current issues. Besides the results that Hayes mentions, genetically modifying humans should not be accepted in any country because it will lead to a rise of discrimination, a loss of humanity, and an increase in tense children.…

    • 1083 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Because the baby is not born yet, it is to some people immoral that a baby’s life should be chosen for them. Others believe that a child’s short life is a life that there is not worth living due to all the incredible amount of pain that a child goes through during diseases such as Tay-Sachs disease. A great deal of religious people have a problem with genetic testing, just like they would about abortion and contraceptives, doctors are according to religious people “playing god” by reading and analyzing “his secret DNA code”. Also people believing in destiny and thing such as that will also find it offending.…

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Human Genetic Engineering

    • 1495 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The ability to genetically engineer and modify our children before birth is now a reality. Genetic Modification is a new science that has created significant controversy for the human race. If genetic modification becomes a common practice without any legal restrictions, our world as we know it would completely change. With this unfathomable practice, our world is now open to an array of opportunities. Scientists can now prevent certain medical conditions passed down to children. The economic advantages that could be generated from this industry are huge. Even though there are advantages to genetic engineering, there are many disadvantages that will outweigh everything else. Richard Hayes, the executive director of the Center for Genetics and Society, talks about the major problems with genetic modification in his essay called “Supersize you Child?”. Hayes makes a very good and agreeable argument about the severe consequences of this scientific discovery. Genetic modification, if not restrained by strict regulations and limits, will be accompanied by detrimental consequences to the human race in social, biological, and economic ways. There is lots of evidence and many reasons to why this claims is true.…

    • 1495 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays

Related Topics