Firstly, there is the question of the site of the memorial building in which Clark’s statue and the murals are contained. It is placed at a site that was believed to be the original location of Fort Sackville. In spite of this, there has been no archeological evidence that has shown its actual location. All the National Park service maintains is that the fort undoubtedly lies within the park's boundaries. Regardless, this situation presented the memorial’s architect, Hirons, with the opportunity to impart a significant degree of Bias when choosing the exact site to construct the building and other large park structures. This could result in a misrepresentation of the historical locations for visitors, albeit …show more content…
While the park loses focus as the result of an added World War I memorial, it still does an excellent job of memorializing the “Conqueror of the Old Northwest”. Additionally, its close or absolute proximity to the original sites of the siege of Fort Sackville provides a great deal of relevance for both visitors to the park and residents of the area. While not perfect, it serves as an excellent commemoration to the Illinois Campaign and Clark’s time in the Revolutionary