Preview

Gerald Scarpelli Case Summary

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
886 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Gerald Scarpelli Case Summary
Gerald Scarpelli, pleaded guilty in July 1965, to a charge of armed robbery in Wisconsin. The trial judge sentenced him to 15 years' imprisonment, but suspended the sentence and placed him on probation for seven years in the custody of the Wisconsin Department of Public Welfare. At that time, he signed an agreement specifying the terms of his probation and a "Travel Permit and Agreement to Return" allowing him to reside in Illinois, with supervision there under an interstate compact. On August 5, 1965, the Adult Probation Department of Cook County, Illinois, accepted him for supervision.

On August 6, Illinois police, who had surprised him (Scarpelli) and one Fred Kleckner Jr., in the course of the burglary of a house, apprehended Gerald Scarpelli. After being told of his constitutional rights, respondent admitted that he and Kleckner had broken into the house for stealing merchandise or money, although he now asserts that his statement was made under duress and
…show more content…
Brewer, 408 U.S. 471 (1972). There we held that the revocation of parole is not a part of a criminal prosecution. "Parole arises after the end of the criminal prosecution, including imposition of sentence. . . . Revocation deprives an individual, not of the absolute liberty to which every citizen is entitled, but only of the conditional liberty properly dependent on observance of special parole restrictions." Even though the revocation of parole is not a part of the criminal prosecution, we held that the loss of liberty entailed is a serious deprivation requiring that the parolee be remitted due process. Specifically, we held that a parolee is entitled to two hearings, one a preliminary hearing at the time of his arrest and detention to determine whether there is probable cause to believe that he has committed a violation of his parole, and the other a somewhat more comprehensive hearing prior to the making of the final revocation

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Rick Sauve is 62 years old and is a co-owner of KCB Cabinets & Renovations together with his wife and his youngest son. Before taking KCB over he gained work experience in a large printing company in Ontario which eventually brought him to Alberta. Rick Sauve is managing his business since almost 12 years by now and overcame several downturns as the financial crisis in 2008. The company took the crisis as a chance and improved the renovation side of the company.…

    • 82 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    While Officer Harrell stood outside of room #337, I conducted a door knock at room #339. I knocked on the door and Witness Scott Anthony Eastman answered it. I asked Eastman if he heard anything unusual coming…

    • 310 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Officer LESSANE met the DEFENDANT PHILLIP SCARBROUGH at the Law Enforcement Center in reference to warrant service. The DEFENDANT was placed under arrest and transported to Beaufort County Detention Center per department policy. Warrant # 2016A0720600260 was served and I cleared the call for service.…

    • 45 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    It was seemingly a normal quiet night on the day of March 12th 2011, until Virginia Rasnick attempted to phone her husband several times with no response. Sidney Rasnick, while on a work assignment in Jesup Georgia, checked into a motel on March 6th 2011. The hotel was owned by Krishna Hospitality INC. Throughout the work trip for all 6 days he was staying there, her husband had a schedule of always making several calls a day to her, and always one at night before he went to bed. So when he didn’t answer the phone that night she knew something was wrong. Her husband Sidney Rasnik, had a history of heart problems and she was growing more and more worried after calling five more times with no response. Desperate she asked one of the hotel operators that answered the phone to check on her husband. She stated that she was “very worried about her husband” and that he had been on medication. The man on the phone told her that he knew who he was and that he was resting and she was disturbing him. She tried to argue this claim but he hung up. She ended up calling the hotel 8 more times, asking for…

    • 954 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Case 8 H&P Gerald Edwards

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages

    HISTORY OF PRESENT ILLNESS: This is a 53-year-old black individual a patient of Dr. Shelton, who has had diabetes for at least six months, but he thinks it has been longer than that. He says his last known blood sugar was in the 300’s. He presents in the ER today with a foot ulcer since January of this year. He stated that it started with blisters where he had soaked his feet too long in hot water. He has had no eye examination for two years. There has been no surveillance of chronic complications of diabetes.…

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The case I like to identify is one that involves Tulsa Police Officer Marvin Blades. The case describes a Tulsa Police Officer that was arrested on August 25 2012. He was charged with five counts of second degree robbery that occurred from August 9th 2011 to August 24th 2012.…

    • 477 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The action of the police officers were completely wrong, both legally and morally. The officers violated Antonio Richard Rochin’s 4th, 14th and 5th Amendment rights. The officers never obtained a warrant to enter and search Rochin’s residence; therefore, making any evidence discovered inadmissible in court. In addition they violated Rochin’s 4th Amendment rights, and no one should have their home broken into by those who’s jobs are supposed to protect us based on some hearsay evidence. It would be understandable if these officers had enough evidence to create probable cause to create enough reasonable suspicion to get a warrant before searching Rochin’s house. Instead the officers chose to take the law into their own hands by “jumping…

    • 346 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jenelle Evans' ex-husband, Courtland Rogers, was arrested and jailed again on Friday, November 20 in Burnswick County, North Carolina.…

    • 314 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Facts: After an investigation revealed substantial evidence that Steiney Richards was involved in dealing drugs from hotel rooms in Madison, Wisconsin, the police obtained a search warrant for Richards’ hotel room on December 31, 1991. Officer’s arrived at the hotel room at 3:40 A.M. with at least one uniformed officer and several other plain clothes officers. When Officer Pharo, dressed as a maintenance man knocked on the door and announced he was maintenance Richards opened the chained door. Upon seeing the uniformed officer standing behind Officer Pharo, Richards slammed the door and retreated into the hotel room. The…

    • 437 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Substantive Facts: Respondent was arrested on the night of January 12, 1975 for the robbery of Providence cab driver John Mulvaney, which lead to his murder. Mulvaney was shot in the head with a sawed-off shotgun, however no weapon was found present on the respondent at the time of his arrest. Upon the respondents’ arrest, respondent was informed of his Miranda rights by three police officers, to which he explained he understood those rights and wanted to speak with a lawyer. Officers then placed the respondent in the rear of a squad car containing the three aforementioned officers, one of which was seated in the rear with the defendant. Once en route to the police station, the officers began…

    • 832 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Morrissey's Parole Case

    • 211 Words
    • 1 Page

    Furthermore, the parolee is still in custody and being on parole allowed the parolee to serve their sentence outside the prison. In addition, Morrissey has violated numerous parole violations. Then the court stating that the parolee should have a informal hearing to explain if the violations are correct and if not their will be an…

    • 211 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    |prisoners? |parole if you sever less than your sentence. Federal prison is also prosecuted by the |…

    • 490 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In regards to the Cagnon case, a rule of law was established that not only afforded probationers their due process rights, but ensured those rights. The law states that if they were alleged to be in violation of the stipulations of their probation, which had been so ordered by the courts, they must be given the right to present their case at a revocation hearing before being incarcerated. In fact the probationer is given dates for two separate hearings; first they are granted a “preliminary hearing”, called a "pre-revocation hearing", or “Gagnon I hearing”, which determines whether they must be incarcerated while awaiting an actual second hearing, which is called the “revocation hearing” or “Gagnon II hearing” (Latessa and Smith 2011). It is possible that they can be released while awaiting the second…

    • 255 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gagnon I Hearing Analysis

    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In just a year period, the United States Supreme Court issued rulings in Morrissey v. Brewer and Gagnon v. Scarpelli (O’Leary & Hanrahan, 1978). These cases set a precedence on how the process for depriving liberty for those on probation or parole (O’Leary & Hanrahan, 1978). It ultimately created the two-part hearing process, which is know as Gagnon I and Gagnon II hearings (O’Leary & Hanrahan, 1978).…

    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Unit 4 Assignment

    • 639 Words
    • 3 Pages

    John Doe is an individual that left his country in an effort to make a better life. However, he does not have legal status in America and was recently arrested for shoplifting merchandise, which was valued over $1,000. At the time of his arrest, John voluntarily began to make incriminating statements to the arresting officers. At the police station, detectives conducted an interview of John asking him about the theft. John Doe has had no prior arrests, is 35 years old, and most of John Doe’s family still resides in his home country. Due to the amount of money involved, the crime is deemed a felony and John was arrested and placed in the county jail in Toms River, NJ. He is going to face the judge in the Ocean County Superior Court; however, he has no money for bail.…

    • 639 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays

Related Topics