Gerry Mullen Case

What options does Gerry Mullen should take in consideration? Analyzing the case I could study the different choices that he have as a CEO of Red Lobsters restaurants. This case is a big representation of ethics. It should be right for Mullen to change the advertisement or change the suppliers who provided the lobsters to the restaurant.
When I read the case I could appreciate that the captains and boat owners in La Mosquitia do not really care about the human rights because If you read the Human Rights Act you can check that this act protect the human in all of it aspects which in this case the owners are violating all the rights but at the same time the owners and captains can say that they offer the job and if people want they take it if not they can find another job. Also, we need to take in consideration that catches lobster is the main activity in La Mosquitia which do not let a lot of choices to the man from that area.
Mullen as a CEO of Red Lobster and the biggest buyer of lobster, he can discuss some ideas with the board's directors and, try to apply it, so the company can be more Social
This alternative could have some advantage, it would protect the people from that country, decrease the murder and diseases causes by this activity. On the other hand, this alternative can have some disadvantage as it will increase the price of the lobsters because of the regulations and the more equipment that the captains and boat owner need to buy to protect the people, it would decrease the amount of lobster that the boats are going to catch because of the new rules and regulations about how many time the buzos can go down. This alternative could be beneficial to the restaurants because it may see that the corporation is worry about the people and is taking responsibility for the bad actions that the suppliers are