GLOBALISATION
SUMMARIZE THE GLOBALIZATION DEBATE. WHAT ARE THE MAJOR
INTEREST GROUPS IN THE WORLD ECONOMY? HOW ARE THEY AFFECTED
BY DIFFERENT ELEMENTS OF GLOBALIZATION?
INTRODUCTION
Many authors have attempted, with relative success, to define globalization in a variety of ways. Some claim that it cannot be done, others claim that it would constrain the meaning to do so, and still others have defied these two beliefs and have constructed a working definition. Despite differing opinions about developing a definition, all authors agree on one thing: that defining this term is anything but easy.
WHAT IS GLOBALIZATION
Globalization is not a single concept that can be defined and encompassed within a set time frame, nor is it a process that can be defined clearly with a beginning and an end.
Furthermore, it cannot be expounded upon with certainty and be applicable to all people and in all situations. Globalization involves economic integration; the transfer of policies across borders; the transmission of knowledge; cultural stability; the reproduction, relations, and discourses of power; it is a global process, a concept, a revolution, and “an establishment of the global market free from sociopolitical control.”
Globalization encompasses all of these things. It is a concept that has been defined variously over the years, with some connotations referring to progress, development and stability, integration and cooperation, and others referring to regression, colonialism, and destabilization. Despite these challenges, this term brings with it a multitude of hidden agendas. An individual’s political ideology, geographic location, social status, cultural background, and ethnic and religious affiliation provide the background that determines how globalization is interpreted.
In 1995, Martin Khor, President of the Third World Network in Malaysia, referred to globalization as colonization. Concurrently, Swedish journalist Thomas Larsson, in his book The Race to
INTEREST GROUPS IN THE WORLD ECONOMY? HOW ARE THEY AFFECTED
BY DIFFERENT ELEMENTS OF GLOBALIZATION?
INTRODUCTION
Many authors have attempted, with relative success, to define globalization in a variety of ways. Some claim that it cannot be done, others claim that it would constrain the meaning to do so, and still others have defied these two beliefs and have constructed a working definition. Despite differing opinions about developing a definition, all authors agree on one thing: that defining this term is anything but easy.
WHAT IS GLOBALIZATION
Globalization is not a single concept that can be defined and encompassed within a set time frame, nor is it a process that can be defined clearly with a beginning and an end.
Furthermore, it cannot be expounded upon with certainty and be applicable to all people and in all situations. Globalization involves economic integration; the transfer of policies across borders; the transmission of knowledge; cultural stability; the reproduction, relations, and discourses of power; it is a global process, a concept, a revolution, and “an establishment of the global market free from sociopolitical control.”
Globalization encompasses all of these things. It is a concept that has been defined variously over the years, with some connotations referring to progress, development and stability, integration and cooperation, and others referring to regression, colonialism, and destabilization. Despite these challenges, this term brings with it a multitude of hidden agendas. An individual’s political ideology, geographic location, social status, cultural background, and ethnic and religious affiliation provide the background that determines how globalization is interpreted.
In 1995, Martin Khor, President of the Third World Network in Malaysia, referred to globalization as colonization. Concurrently, Swedish journalist Thomas Larsson, in his book The Race to
References: 2. Andrew Hurrell and Ngaire Woods, “Globalization and Inequality” Final version published in Millennium 24:3 (1995) 447-470 and also reprinted in Richard Higgot (ed.), “The New Political Economy of Globalization” (Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 2000) 3. “Development and Globalization Facts and Figures”, (United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, Geneva 2004) 4. Geertz, C. (2000) Available Light: Anthropological Reflections on Philosophical Topics. 5. Giddens, A. (1990) The Consequences of Modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press. 7. Howes, D. (ed.) (1996) Cross-Cultural Consumption: Global Markets, Local Realities. 8. Joseph E. Stiglitz, “Globalization and Its Discontents” (New York: W. W. Norton, 2002). 9. James Raymond Vreeland, “The IMF and Economic Development” (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003). (Occasional Papers From The American Forum For Global Education, No. 176: 2002-2003) 14. Mead R. and Andrews T.G (2009) “International Management”, Fourth Edition, Chichester England: John Wiley & Sons. 15. Mullins L.J (2005) “Management and Organizational Behaviour”, Seventh edition, Harlow UK: Prentice Hall/Financial Times. 16. Michele Putko and Clayton K. Chun “Defining And Quantifying Globalization” (USAWC Strategy Research Project, 2006). Program on Geopolitical Implications of Globalization and Transnational Security, 2006). 19. Randall Stone, “Lending Credibility: The International Monetary Fund and the PostCommunist Transition” (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2002). 20. Rugimbana R. and Nwankwo S. (2003) “Cross-cultural Marketing”, London: Thomson. 21. Ronald Labonte and Ted Schrecker “Globalization and social determinants of health: Analytic and strategic review paper” (Globalization Knowledge Network, 2005). 23. Trompenaars F. and Hampden-Turner C. (1997) “Riding the Waves of Culture”, London: Nicholas Brealey 25. Thomas Pogge, “World Poverty and Human Rights” (Cambridge, UK: Polity, 2002).