Preview

God, Science Debate

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
639 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
God, Science Debate
God science debate
Wide spread myth that science has always been on a collision course with the belief in God and so therefore, natural science and faith in God are incompatible.
Argued by the new atheists - that science leads away from God.- leads to atheism.
Myth; significant natural science project of this generation is the human genome project. First director of it was Jim Watson- discovered the double helix structure of DNA he was an atheist.
2d director - Francis Collins hes a Christian who was part of the discovering of the human genome project.
Top scientist same project, same techniques of analysis, so what divides them is their world view.
Conflict is not between science and religion but much deeper, it is between two different world views.
3 families of world views
Ancient Greek world were fascinated by the universe.
Big questions they asked themselves; what is ultimate reality???
Atomist - Ultimate reality consisted of mass energy. They believed that atoms form galaxies, stars, planets, worlds, and the idea of God. - World view materialism
Two diametrically opposed world views:
You are forming your world view.
Jim Watson – materialistic view
Francis Collins – theistic view as a Christian.
Not do science and religion cancel each other out, but where does science sit in relation to those two world views. Two presentations of two different world views with natural science in the middle. Is natural science neutral or does it point to materialism or does it point to theism, you can establish any kind of answer by considering the evidence. Evidence sources
1. History of science,
2. Philosophy of science
3. Results of science.
History of the universe, invested interest in understanding it gives us a concept of our identity.
Personal God- and we are made in his image.
History of science - modern science explosive rise.
Motor that drive science;
Science is claiming authority to realise it’s not coexistence with rationality.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    God and science, as Keller points out later in his book, are not in conflict, showing why many evolutionists are Christians. These insights give Keller’s readers a reason to believe, and through this he helps them realize all the evidence they never knew was right in front of…

    • 1168 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As scientists, or natural philosophers, made new discoveries and theories they often dedicated them to the church, whether it was literal dedication or whether the finding supported the church. Even though they meant to support the church, many of those who did not understand the findings rejected them, but the fact that the common man could not always understand what an astronomer had investigated does not mean that it should be rejected. For the beauty and usefulness of the discoveries support what the common man knows and understands which is that God is God. (Doc. 2) The pressure that came from being rejected pushed scientists to search for acceptance in many cases for fear of being outcast, and there was no greater place to search for acceptance than from the church. Nicolaus Copernicus, Polish priest and astronomer, dedicated his works to Pope Paul III stating how he was not one to shrink from another’s criticism and that his findings contribute to the well being of the Church. (Doc. 1) Copernicus was a man of the church as well, making his words to the Pope weighted, however. Natural philosophers used the church as evidence in their findings as well. Once atoms and the structure of the world were discovered, it was too mind-blowing to not believe that all this perfect complexity was not brought together by an all-powerful being. But seeing that most men during this time were in some way affiliated with the church, it was very common for men to make these sorts of assumptions. (Doc. 8) Religion thus gave scientists a reason for discovery and evidence supporting discoveries.…

    • 659 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Some people believe that only science is correct. There is no evidence of the seven days of creation except by word, whereas all theories of evolution and the Big Bang have a large amount of evidence, and hundreds of hours of research dedicated to them. Evolution and the Big Bang have explanations for and biological reasons, whereas why would a God suddenly decide to make a universe and planet for living organisms?…

    • 418 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The article claims that by nature, it is impossible for science and religion to conflict primarily because their individual concerns are entirely distinct. This, however, brings about the debate of the role of both religion and science in our society. Religion I mainly faith based and is illogical, that does not require evidence. Science, on the other hand, is logical and is purely based on actual evidence. Many have criticized this idea on nonoverlapping magisteria claiming it holds no basis. For instance, given that both science and religion has different stories on how the earth came to exist, are they both teaching different domains? The debate lies on whether or not science and religion can co-exist without overlapping or…

    • 502 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    It would be difficult to look at science its methods and conclusions without looking at how any of us or anything came into being. In Genesis 1:1-4, it articulates as such, “1IN THE beginning God (prepared, formed, fashioned, and) created the heavens and the earth.2The earth was without form and an empty waste, and darkness was upon the face of the very great deep. The Spirit of God was moving (hovering, brooding) over the face of the waters. 3And God…

    • 2295 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    At the outset of the nineteenth century in Britain, religious faith and the study of the sciences tended to exist in harmony with each other. The study of God’s Word, in the Bible, and His Works, in nature, were assumed to be two versions of the same ultimate truth.1 When William Paley published Natural Theology; or, Evidences of the Existence and Attributes of the Deity in 1802, he reinforced the concept of a designing God after positing that natural objects show evidence of design, emphasizing nature as God’s creation.2…

    • 1118 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Attention Getter: The great quarrel between science and religion has been in full swing since their beginning and has since taken a twist into controversy. Science wants to see the facts while religion bases everything on their belief in the Bible. These statements still hold truth today.…

    • 964 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    As the perception of natural science and religious expression…

    • 2382 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Science has had a huge impact on society in the past few centuries with medicines curing disastrous diseases and the growing success of technology. This success has led to a widespread belief in science; believing science can deliver well to the people in society. However, this success has been dimmed by science causing problems; for example global warming and pollution as these are both products of science. However the good and bad effects of science show features distinguishing it from other belief systems as it enables us to explain predict and control the world in a way that non-scientific or pre scientific belief systems cannot do. Science is a belief system as it fills the gaps which ideology and religion cannot fill and science also makes sense of the world around us. An example of this is science explains why earth is the perfect environment for humans to live on. However, Rationalists point out that science is based on fact, whereas beliefs are not: they rely on faith. Therefore, Rationalists argue that science is not a belief system. Dawkins put forward that science is based on evidence so science cannot be a belief system. Whereas some people use science to explain the world but we need to have faith in science, an example of this can be in regards to cures for cancer. Therefore people have faith in system and would claim science is a…

    • 1003 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Charles Towne Summary

    • 745 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Robinson explains the conflicts between religion and science is because science is based on observation, while religion is based on faith alone (1999-2012). This is exactly the line of misconception that Charles Townes was trying to explain. He thoroughly explained and supported that thought that it is what people think, however they are wrong. Townes explains that science and religion are actually both faith based as so to say that with religion you have faith in God, which is similar to having faith in finding a scientific reason for…

    • 745 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    between advocates of science from one hand, and the advocates of religion, which is apparently the…

    • 986 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    It could be argued by the Western world, that science is our God. Due to the vast progression in science, man has been able to make amazing discoveries and accomplishments, such as putting roving robots on mars, creating machines that can go faster than the speed of sound and creating a thirty inch television that can be rolled up and be put in a paper towel tube for our convenience. While scientific discoveries and accomplishments are usually amazing, beneficial and bring further understanding of the world around us, there is a real danger of replacing God with science, such as those who hold the belief of scientific naturalism. Those who uphold scientific naturalism believe that “nothing exists except the material, there are no nonphysical entities such as God or souls”, as they shut out God completely and try to impose their beliefs on the world around them (Wilkens & Sanford, 2009, p. 101).…

    • 1057 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Science and Religion

    • 823 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Assess the view that science has replaced religion as the main ideological influence in society today? (33 marks)…

    • 823 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Science contributes moral as well as material blessings to the world. Its great moral contribution is objective, or the scientific point of view. The means doubting everything except facts; it means hewing to the facts, lets the chips fall where they may.” (163)…

    • 506 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Its level of reasoning is very cyclical and its assumptions mostly re based on science contracted without human interest in mind. On this criterion alone this worldview is false. According to Naturalism, the universe is static and does not change. Therefore, everything within the universe should be easily observable and accepted by the human mind and reality is exactly what you see before you. Once applied, these assumptions generally disqualify any other threatening worldview. Any ideals or thoughts that fall outside these walls and principles are essentially unreal and not true. This circular way of reasoning can be proven to be dangerous as it can rule science itself as being not real. It is understandable how a scientist or scholar may find themselves believing in a naturalistic worldview – they generally assume the supposition before the research has even been…

    • 2863 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Best Essays