Preview

Good and Bad Reasons for Believing

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2111 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Good and Bad Reasons for Believing
Taha Abdus Samad
2016-09-0001
Bushra Butt
Writing and Communication SS 100-12
16th April, 2012
Good And Bad Reasons For Believing
By Richard Dawkins
The text ‘Good and Bad Reasons for Believing’ is written by Richard Dawkins. It is an open letter which he wrote to his daughter, Juliet, when she turned ten and is part of his book, ‘A Devil’s Chaplain’. Dawkins feels his daughter is old enough now to not believe everything she is told blindly but should investigate what she is told to find out if it is true or not. This letter is also meant for theists and religious scholars whom Dawkins attacks in the letter. Dawkins is an evolutionary biologist and author. It is worth mentioning due to the nature of the letter that he is an outspoken atheist and a famous critic of religion. Although the writer makes a valid claim when saying that traditions are a bad reason for believing anything, the fact that he considers revelations a bad reason for believing can be argued against. In addition, the tone used throughout is decent and effective apart from a few instances where it can be deemed harsh, however, there are various logical fallacies in the text and the writer is also very biased especially when he talks about religion.
Dawkins discusses how evidence and observation are the only two good reasons for believing anything while he believes tradition, authority and revelation to be bad reasons for believing. He feels children should be told this from an early age because that is the age when man is most susceptible to wrong information and this will prevent people from passing this wrong information to future generations.
Firstly, the fact that the writer considers tradition to be a bad reason for believing may be one that the reader agrees with. Traditional beliefs are those that are handed down from generation to generation. There may not be adequate evidence to prove whether those beliefs are true or not but since they have been acted upon for a long time,



Cited: Dawkins, Richard. "Good And Bad Reasons For Believing." A Devil 's Chaplain: Reflections on Hope, Lies, Science, and Love. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 2003. Print. McKinlay, Brian. "The Idea of Revelation in Christian Faith and Thought." HubPages. Web. 15 Apr. 2012. <http://brianmckinlay.hubpages.com/hub/Idea-of-revelation-in-Christian-faith-and-thought>. "Speakers Richard Dawkins: Evolutionary Biologist." Richard Dawkins. Web. 15 Apr. 2012. <http://www.ted.com/speakers/richard_dawkins.html>.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    James Patrick Holding’s article talks about how “demagogues” like Dawkins find it hard to believe that creationists’ views are accepted and the double standard shown by them in accepting a thesis. The author seems to be offended as indicated by how he can mention “a lengthy list of the insulting rhetoric Dawkins has heaped upon the creationists”. Holding questions the credibility of the beliefs supported by Dawkins, who seems to be raising doubts on the view point of the creationists because the view belongs to a minority alone. Holding believes that people like Dawkins rarely put an effort in researching a particular idea, but they add those beliefs in their “agenda” only if it proves to be beneficial for them. The readers get the hint of irony that Holding tries to convey through his article that even though Dawkins supports the ‘Christ myth’ through his actions, he happens to give a statement of how there is a possibility of the existence of Jesus. The mockery in the article is pretty obvious as first Dawkins is said to have worked in a film called “The God Who Wasn’t There” – a film that supports the idea of how Jesus did not even exist at all. The author further mentions how the “Christ Myth” remains unsupported by any of the historians and the “leading proponent of Christ myth over the past century – is not a historian, but a professor of German”. The readers begin to doubt the credibility of Dawkins after reading this article and whether he and his “ideological cohorts” actually care to research a prevalent idea before they declare their endorsement of it. Even though people like Dawkins make sure their beliefs are free from any kind of doubts, most of the readers would definitely become cautious in believing the claims of these people after reading this…

    • 313 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In “One Side Can Be Wrong,” Richard Dawkins and Jerry Coyne argue that teaching creationism along side evolution does not make sense, and that creationism has no business being in the science classes. Richard Dawkins and Jerry Coyne are evolutionary biologists at Oxford University and the University of Chicago. They published this essay in the Guardian in September 2005, seeking to appeal to middle-aged parents. They argue that creationism cannot provide any positive evidence to create a controversy and therefore should not be taught in schools to children and teenagers. On the other hand, there is a substantial amount of evidence for evolution where debate and conversation can arise.…

    • 1245 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    “People believe things they have been told to”. Dawkins claimed that it is unrealistic to suggest there is a life after death without any empirical evidence; people have created this false analogy that there is something more out there without much evidence. Seeing as there is no God and no one has seen him clearly suggested to Dawkins that there isn’t one and the religious ideas surrounding life after death are falsifiable. To him the afterlife was that of a “delusion of the next world”. Dawkins was a very intelligent man and to him belief in the afterlife was illogical and implausible. He claimed life was no more than DNA reproducing itself. Are his claims surrounding life after death not realistic when we take empirical evidence in to account?…

    • 2679 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    God and science, as Keller points out later in his book, are not in conflict, showing why many evolutionists are Christians. These insights give Keller’s readers a reason to believe, and through this he helps them realize all the evidence they never knew was right in front of…

    • 1168 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although the Darwinian evolution theory came out 150 years ago when it was first introduced in On the Origin of Species in 1859, nowadays there are still many people who firmly believe in the creationism, even some who are well educated. In chapter three of River Out of Eden Richard Dawkins brings out this situation and refutes creationism by citing scientific experiments, and finally he points out that gradualism is a principle of the evolution nature world, one that becomes indispensable when one is trying to explain complex phenomena.…

    • 1061 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Dawkins was inspired to write an introduction to science, after, and based his book on how science closes the gap between what is real and what is not.…

    • 1484 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Does Clifford present a persuasive viewpoint of religious faith? In his article “The Ethics of Belief (Clifford, 1877) W.K. Clifford sought to claim that it is inappropriate always, in all places, and for anyone, to believe anything upon unsatisfactory evidence. The goal of this paper is to determine whether indeed this opinion offered by Clifford, when considering religious faith, is persuasive. To successfully do this, I will weigh up the arguments that Clifford put forward, including that of disbelieving anything based upon scarce evidence, it always does damage and therefore is wrong. Such an assertion is in direct conflict to those pious believers who consider their blind faith as a goodness and for whom proof is something that is needless…

    • 1524 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    He solely bases his beliefs on the quantity of evidence held by each side, using scientific evidence when regarding evolution and biblical literalism when regarding creationism. Dawkins from his statement concludes that based on his studies, all the evidence points towards evolution, implying that the Bible or any other religious book or testament is not a sufficient amount of data to conclude that the belief that life was created by a divine being is legitimate. Furthermore, Dawkins’ argument is captivating by distinctly claiming that he believes in one side over the other, averting from flaw of the “Integration” model, where science and religion can be basically unified as if they were in the same field of study. Additionally, Dawkins mentions the lack of evidence creationism has which can be compared to a film in which a character had the same problem,…

    • 1501 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Science has had a huge impact on society in the past few centuries with medicines curing disastrous diseases and the growing success of technology. This success has led to a widespread belief in science; believing science can deliver well to the people in society. However, this success has been dimmed by science causing problems; for example global warming and pollution as these are both products of science. However the good and bad effects of science show features distinguishing it from other belief systems as it enables us to explain predict and control the world in a way that non-scientific or pre scientific belief systems cannot do. Science is a belief system as it fills the gaps which ideology and religion cannot fill and science also makes sense of the world around us. An example of this is science explains why earth is the perfect environment for humans to live on. However, Rationalists point out that science is based on fact, whereas beliefs are not: they rely on faith. Therefore, Rationalists argue that science is not a belief system. Dawkins put forward that science is based on evidence so science cannot be a belief system. Whereas some people use science to explain the world but we need to have faith in science, an example of this can be in regards to cures for cancer. Therefore people have faith in system and would claim science is a…

    • 1003 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dawkins wrote a book called the The God Delusion, where he explains his many arguments against faith. Dawkins believes that religion is unnecessary, and at times dangerous, and that science is the only realm that people should be concerned with. Much of what Dawkins argues in his book is that although the world seems to have some natural order, that can all be attributed to evolution through natural selection. He believes that the critical flaw in religious people’s views is that they perceive a natural order in the world and attribute this to God. Dawkins writes in his book that “Faith is the great cop-out, the great excuse to evade the need to think and evaluate evidence. Faith is the belief in spite of, even perhaps because of, the lack of evidence.” “Faith can be very very dangerous, and deliberately to implant it into the vulnerable mind of an innocent child is a grievous wrong.” Essentially Dawkins argues that faith is a way of avoiding the difficult and complex questions in life. Dawkins also believes that teaching children faith is dangerous and unfair, as children do not have the ability or knowledge to dispute religion at a young age. This results in children believing religion as fact, without giving them the opportunity to decide what they believe in for themselves. Dawkins provides his logic on why God does not exist, he states “The temptation [to attribute the…

    • 1534 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In his article “On Being an Atheist,” H. J. McCloskey makes an entertaining, but in the end inadequate, explanation as to why the arguments for God’s existence fail (limiting himself to the only two he cared to deal with), and why Atheism provides more comfort to the hurting person than Theism.…

    • 2161 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Note in my book, Chap. 29, ‘What’s God got to do…’ there is a comprehensive critique of Dawkins’ position. I suggest that you take a look at that section of my book to help you to write a more potent reaction to his video.…

    • 1222 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Appeal to tradition has occurred in society since the birth of mankind. The claims made by…

    • 857 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    but does some of his own opinions as well. One of Dawkins views is that when it comes to religion people usually believe what their parents do: what they grew up believing. Many individuals do not look for evidence or justification in their religion, but believe in something because that is all they know. Another one of Dawkins’ views on religion differs from Humes in that Dawkins states that believing in God requires more clarification. Dawkins questions why the existence of the universe has to have a creator, but God does not.…

    • 809 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In the first chapter of The Greatest Show On Earth, Dawkins discusses the acceptance of evolution as fact. He says that even with the insurmountable evidence to prove that it is a fact, evolution is still considered to some degree to be just a theory. In a survey of Americans, 40% of people oppose the idea of evolution. They instead believe that humans were created independently from all other living organisms. The percentage is only slightly lower in Britain. He argues that many of those who do not believe evolution to be a fact are uninformed. He states that his purpose for writing this book is to educate these people so that they may realize the truth and change their minds.…

    • 992 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays

Related Topics