Preview

Government in Sparta

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
810 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Government in Sparta
Government in Ancient Sparta

Supposedly formed by Lycurgus, the government in Sparta is very unique in that it is an Oligarchy; combining monarchy, aristocracy and democracy.
The reason for this is that few people actually ruled Sparta, and their power or time in office was limited to avoid corruption. There were two kings to keep a check on one another, there were 28 members of the Gerousia – a council of elders that included the two kings, five ephors who held in their hands the highest of powers but only served for one year, and the apella which was made up of all other Spartan citizens or Homoioi.

The Ephors controlled almost every aspect of Spartan life and were only limited by the fact that they could only rule for one year and only once in a lifetime. At the end of their term, Ephors had to justify that all their actions and decisions had been for the good of Sparta.
At the beginning of life, a week after birth, Spartan children were judged by the Ephors. If the children were healthy, they would live. If not, they would be left exposed to the elements on the mountains. Responsibilities of the Ephors also included declaring war on the helots each year and accompanying Kings to war. They were the Spartan form of a civil court and could replace magistrates or overthrow kings at any point in time. Ephors received foreign envoys and also controlled the Krypetia, the ruthless group of Spartan youths whose job was to kill helots.
They’re massive powers were expressed by Xenophon, Aristotle and Plutarch. Xenophon explains that Ephors were ‘competent to punish whomsoever they choose’. He goes on to also express the honour that Ephors were eligible for, stating “All rise from their seats for the King, but the Ephors do not rise from their seats of office.”
Plutarch believed that the Ephorate strengthened the aristocracy and Spartan constitution and was to the people’s advantage.
Aristotle, however, was in complete disagreement about the Ephorate,

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Level of debt grew and government became more corrupt as Spartans could bribe ephors for additional and better plots of land…

    • 788 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Athens were ruled by a council of only nobles. They did not have any written laws, they only had the nobles that presided over the land and made all the rules. Unfortunately, the nobles did not always agree which caused arguments between them.…

    • 511 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    "Most famous monarchies were those on states of Macedonia and Epeiros" Spartan maintained a private association, it is recognized for the arrangement of two kings. Kings were held in line by ephors who were as well selected by the assembly. Kings were declared at a young age. Spartan kings could be placed on trial and also exiled. Tyrants were single runners of a state who had attained control in an undemocratic way.…

    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gerousia Dbq

    • 522 Words
    • 3 Pages

    To be considered a “citizen” in Sparta, you had to be: male, could not be a Helot, or Perioikoi, or a slave. There was an assembly of all male citizens, an elder council of men over 60, the Gerousia, and the Ephors that consisted of 5 magistrates. The Gerousia, was an elite elder council of 30 men and was the Spartan equivalent of the senate. The Gerousia was made up of the wealthier and more conservative men. When one of the 30 seats became available in the Gerousia, it was the assembly who chose the man to fill the Gerousia vacancy. The Ephors were elected each year for one, one-year term by the members of the assembly. The assembly consisted of all male Spartan citizens. Becoming an Ephor was the only way to for non-aristocratic citizens to gain political power. The assembly passed laws and was responsible for making decisions concerning war, but it was the Ephors and the Gerousia that selected which matters would be decided by the assembly and the Ephors and the Gerousia could veto the decisions made by the Assembly so the Ephors and the Gerousia generally monopolized the city-states decisions.…

    • 522 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When Sparta was in danger, Lykurgos changed the economic life of the Spartans to create a stable balance between the rich and the poor. He did not only create the ideal government for Sparta but he also came up with ideas to create equality and…

    • 324 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This written assignment will address these questions about Athens and Sparta: How did people in Athens and Sparta obtain the right to participate in public life and make decisions affecting the community? Who held public office? What rules governed the selection of public office holders? How…

    • 1661 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Ephors Research Paper

    • 515 Words
    • 3 Pages

    There were few limitations involving being an ephor. They were only elected for one year. During campaigns they had no voice in command, but they might bring the royal leaders to trial for alleged errors in conducting war. Also, when they no longer stood as an ephor, they could get in trouble from the government if they did something wrong within the community. So basically, it was no longer taken into account that they were previously an…

    • 515 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    ap euro

    • 470 Words
    • 2 Pages

    After the helots revolted, the Spartans had to develop a new way of life. There were almost 10 times the amounts of helots as compared to the free citizens. To do this, the Spartans made changes that turned their city into a military academy and camp. An official would decide if an infant was fit to survive, and if he was, he was taken from his home at age seven, and trained to become a warrior. Their constitution was mixed, with various parts of monarchy, oligarchy, and democracy. The goal of the new government in Sparta was to “win glory in war”.…

    • 470 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Since Ancient Greece was spread out into the individual city-states, it forced them to each have their own forms of government. Their governments ranged from military rule to dictatorship to democracies. In Athens under the rule of Pericles, their government was a democracy. Any man over the age of 18, who wanted to, could be involved and got paid for being part of the government like people do today. This influenced our government because although we do nat participate directly in day to day government functions, we participate indirectly. Athens also had a jury, who in trials made the final decisions, like we do today. You also had the magistrates, who went out ald enforced the laws like we have police officers do today. Ancient Greeks have…

    • 136 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    How Did Sparta Change

    • 1516 Words
    • 7 Pages

    While this system helped Sparta become the military powerhouse it was in ancient times, it did not help them create an environment in which a complex political system could grow. The Spartans decided to opt for a political system that was stable and a system that protected the people of Sparta. By using oligarchy as their form of government, the Spartans let the powerful few rule which stagnated the role of the everyday citizen in politics. Now those few powerful people controlled every aspect of life in Sparta. Even though Sparta did not have a government that thrived on the participation of its peoples, Sparta did have one unique characteristic that the other city-states did not have. Spartan women had a status of power and respect that was not seen in the ancient world. Spartan women were given almost the same rights as their male counter parts. The women were taught to read and wright, they were allowed to participate in sports, and Spartan women even had the ability to own land in society. Even though they had all these rights, Athenians still participated more in government. This is shown by the way Athens ran its government. An example of this is…

    • 1516 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Antigone Sophacles

    • 570 Words
    • 3 Pages

    1.) Eteocles and Polynices were the paternally cursed fratricidal brothers who fought for control of Thebes after their father Oedipus abdicated.…

    • 570 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The most powerful man came from a group of selected rich families. Spartan had slaves, called the helots, to help with the labor of “producing food, building homes, tending animals, weaving cloth, and doing basic craft work” (Cuultures of the West, pg.118). The helots had no place in society; they “could not own properties and so could not rise to become full-citizens” (Sparta, Ancient History Encyclopedia). Spartan citizens received little education and made no contact with the outside world. The women in Sparta had “rights that other Greek women did not have” (Athens vs Sparta, Diffen). They can posses properties and interact with men as they choose. This type of freedom will be considered unacceptable in other Greek…

    • 621 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    On the home front spartan kings had far less power the real power was in the Gerousia that was an elder council made up of males over 60 years of age. The rules that governed the selection of public office holders in Sparta were rigid. To be one of the kings you had to come from the bloodline of kings. To be an Ephor you had to be elected and could only serve one year in office. To be a member of the Gerousia you had to be age 60 and you coud apply but there could only be thirty members at a time. The assembly was all recognized free males of Sparta however they had little actual power. In Athens it was a democracy and wealth ruled the selection of public office holders. Athens and Sparta stood on two different sides of the fence one was a democracy and one was a dictatorship. The things they were similar in their governmental structures was keeping the poor and the weak down while the middle and the top thrived. Some of the things that the city-states differed on were the treatment of the low class Sparta made it obvious that you were lower than them whereas In Athens it was done but not as…

    • 418 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I believe that the Legalist idea of government is Sparta because to the Legalists, strength not goodness was a ruler’s greatest virtue. Many feudal rulers chose Legalism as the most effective way to keep order. So in my opinion Sparta was a more Legalist idea of government because of that they were very harsh on their people for many reasons. One form of it was that as Sparta was a warrior society, so from an early age, boys trained for a lifetime in the military. Officials of the government examined every newborn and any child seen as weak or sickly was abandoned and left to die. At the age of seven, boys were moved into barracks, where they were toughened by a course diet, hard exercise, and rigid discipline. Education was of no importance in Sparta, but to have a well trained military was. Girls were also trained rigorously and strengthened their bodies so they could give birth to healthy boys for the Spartan army. Women were seen as special for they were the ones who gave birth to the strong boys who will one day be part of the Spartan army. The Spartans completely isolated themselves from other Greeks. They looked down on trade and travel, because the government did not want their people exposed to foreign ideas.…

    • 360 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Greek Polis

    • 528 Words
    • 3 Pages

    As Hopper stated in The Early Greeks, Sparta "began to develop as a militant polis with a rigid social structure and a government that included an assembly representing all citizens." It had an anti-tyrant policy; the Spartans felt that tyranny was an unstable form of government. Tyranny was replaced by oligarchy, which was the governing of a ruling class. Patterson discusses that the government of Sparta was based on military expansion. After the first Messenian War, the Spartan warriors divided the land among themselves and reduced the Messenians to Helots. The Helots worked the land while the Spartans devoted their time to military service. By 550 BCE Sparta had a mixed constitution.…

    • 528 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics